Nomura T, Nakajima S, Kawabata K, Yamashita F, Takakura Y, Hashida M
Department of Drug Delivery Research, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Kyoto University, Sakyo-ku, Japan.
Cancer Res. 1997 Jul 1;57(13):2681-6.
The pharmacokinetic properties and gene expression of naked plasmid DNA and its cationic liposome complexes were studied after direct intratumoral injection. Using a Walker 256 tissue-isolated tumor perfusion system, we quantified the recovery of naked plasmid DNA and cationic liposome complexes in the tumor, leakage from the tumor surface, and the venous outflow after intratumoral injection. Approximately 50% of naked plasmid DNA had been eliminated from the tumor 2 h after injection, whereas more than 90% of plasmid DNA was retained in the tumor when it was complexed with cationic liposomes. However, the distribution of these complexes in the tumor was restricted to the tissue surrounding the injection site. Pharmacokinetic analysis of the venous outflow profiles suggested that the rate-limiting process that determines the retention of plasmid DNA in the tumor is transferred from the injection site in the tumor tissue and that complexation with cationic liposomes may retard this process. Furthermore, we examined the gene expression of chloramphenicol acetyltransferase DNA constructs (naked pCMV-CAT) and the corresponding cationic liposome [3-beta-(N-(N',N'-dimethylaminoethane)carbamoyl)cholesterol] complexes. A similar level of gene expression was observed in vivo after direct intratumoral injection of naked DNA and its cationic liposome complexes. In both cases, a great variation was observed between tumors, and localization of gene-transduced cells in the tumor tissue was limited to the area in the vicinity of the injection site. Thus, these pharmacokinetic and gene expression studies have demonstrated that cationic liposomes can enhance the retention of injected DNA in the tumor model, whereas cationic liposome complex does not necessarily improve gene expression because of its poor dissemination in this tumor. The present study also suggested that there is a need to control the behavior of the injected naked plasmid DNA and its cationic liposome complexes to ensure better distribution throughout the tumor.
在直接瘤内注射后,研究了裸质粒DNA及其阳离子脂质体复合物的药代动力学特性和基因表达。使用Walker 256组织分离肿瘤灌注系统,我们定量了瘤内注射后裸质粒DNA和阳离子脂质体复合物在肿瘤中的回收率、从肿瘤表面的渗漏以及静脉流出量。注射后2小时,约50%的裸质粒DNA已从肿瘤中消除,而当质粒DNA与阳离子脂质体复合时,超过90%的质粒DNA保留在肿瘤中。然而,这些复合物在肿瘤中的分布仅限于注射部位周围的组织。对静脉流出曲线的药代动力学分析表明,决定质粒DNA在肿瘤中保留的限速过程是从肿瘤组织中的注射部位转移的,并且与阳离子脂质体复合可能会延缓这一过程。此外,我们检测了氯霉素乙酰转移酶DNA构建体(裸pCMV-CAT)及其相应阳离子脂质体[3-β-(N-(N',N'-二甲基氨基乙烷)氨基甲酰)胆固醇]复合物的基因表达。在直接瘤内注射裸DNA及其阳离子脂质体复合物后,在体内观察到了相似水平的基因表达。在这两种情况下,肿瘤之间都观察到了很大的差异,并且基因转导细胞在肿瘤组织中的定位仅限于注射部位附近的区域。因此,这些药代动力学和基因表达研究表明,阳离子脂质体可以增强注射的DNA在肿瘤模型中的保留,而阳离子脂质体复合物由于其在该肿瘤中的扩散不良,不一定能改善基因表达。本研究还表明,需要控制注射的裸质粒DNA及其阳离子脂质体复合物的行为,以确保在整个肿瘤中更好地分布。