• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

β受体阻滞剂对心力衰竭患者死亡率的影响:随机临床试验的荟萃分析。

Effect of beta-blockade on mortality in patients with heart failure: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.

作者信息

Heidenreich P A, Lee T T, Massie B M

机构信息

Department of Health Research and Policy, Stanford University, California, USA.

出版信息

J Am Coll Cardiol. 1997 Jul;30(1):27-34. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(97)00104-6.

DOI:10.1016/s0735-1097(97)00104-6
PMID:9207617
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

We sought to evaluate the current evidence for an effect of beta-blockade treatment on mortality in patients with congestive heart failure (CHF).

BACKGROUND

Although numerous small studies have suggested a benefit with beta-blocker therapy in patients with heart failure, a clear survival benefit has not been demonstrated. A recent combined analysis of several studies with the alpha- and beta-adrenergic blocking agent carvedilol demonstrated a significant survival advantage; however, the total number of events was small. Furthermore, it is unclear if previous studies with other beta-blockers are consistent with this finding.

METHODS

Randomized clinical trials of beta-blockade treatment in patients with CHF from January 1975 through February 1997 were identified using a MEDLINE search and a review of reports from scientific meetings. Studies were included if mortality was reported during 3 or more months of follow-up.

RESULTS

We identified 35 reports, 17 of which met the inclusion criteria. These studies included 3,039 patients with follow-up ranging from 3 months to 2 years. Beta-blockade was associated with a trend toward mortality reduction in 13 studies. When all 17 reports were combined, beta-blockade significantly reduced all-cause mortality (random effect odds ratio [OR] 0.69, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.54 to 0.88). A trend toward greater treatment effect was noted for nonsudden cardiac death (OR 0.58, 95% CI 0.40 to 0.83) compared with sudden cardiac death (OR 0.84, 95% CI 0.59 to 1.2). Similar reductions in mortality were observed for patients with ischemic (OR 0.69, 95% CI 0.49 to 0.98) and nonischemic cardiomyopathy (OR 0.69, 95% CI 0.47 to 0.99). The survival benefit was greater for trials of the drug carvedilol (OR 0.54, 95% CI 0.36 to 0.81) than for noncarvedilol drugs (OR 0.82, 95% CI 0.60 to 1.12); however, the difference did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.10).

CONCLUSIONS

Pooled evidence suggests that beta-blockade reduces all-cause mortality in patients with CHF. Additional trials are required to determine whether carvedilol differs in its effect from other agents.

摘要

目的

我们试图评估β受体阻滞剂治疗对充血性心力衰竭(CHF)患者死亡率影响的现有证据。

背景

尽管众多小型研究提示β受体阻滞剂治疗对心力衰竭患者有益,但尚未证实其具有明确的生存获益。最近一项对多项使用α和β肾上腺素能阻滞剂卡维地洛的研究进行的综合分析显示出显著的生存优势;然而,事件总数较少。此外,尚不清楚之前使用其他β受体阻滞剂的研究是否与这一发现一致。

方法

通过检索MEDLINE以及回顾科学会议报告,确定1975年1月至1997年2月期间CHF患者β受体阻滞剂治疗的随机临床试验。如果报告了3个月或更长时间随访期间的死亡率,则纳入研究。

结果

我们确定了35份报告,其中17份符合纳入标准。这些研究包括3039例患者,随访时间为3个月至2年。13项研究中β受体阻滞剂与死亡率降低趋势相关。当合并所有17份报告时,β受体阻滞剂显著降低全因死亡率(随机效应比值比[OR]0.69,95%置信区间[CI]0.54至0.88)。与心源性猝死(OR 0.84,95%CI 0.59至1.2)相比,非心源性猝死的治疗效果有更大的降低趋势(OR 0.58,95%CI 0.40至0.83)。缺血性心肌病(OR 0.69,95%CI 0.49至0.98)和非缺血性心肌病(OR 0.69,95%CI 0.47至0.99)患者的死亡率也有类似降低。卡维地洛试验的生存获益(OR 0.54,95%CI 0.36至0.81)大于非卡维地洛药物(OR 0.82,95%CI 0.60至1.12);然而,差异未达到统计学意义(p = 0.10)。

结论

汇总证据表明β受体阻滞剂可降低CHF患者的全因死亡率。需要更多试验来确定卡维地洛与其他药物在疗效上是否存在差异。

相似文献

1
Effect of beta-blockade on mortality in patients with heart failure: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.β受体阻滞剂对心力衰竭患者死亡率的影响:随机临床试验的荟萃分析。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 1997 Jul;30(1):27-34. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(97)00104-6.
2
Effects of beta-blocker therapy on mortality in patients with heart failure. A systematic overview of randomized controlled trials.β受体阻滞剂治疗对心力衰竭患者死亡率的影响。随机对照试验的系统综述。
Eur Heart J. 1997 Apr;18(4):560-5. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.eurheartj.a015297.
3
Beta-blockers in heart failure. The 'new wave' of clinical trials.心力衰竭中的β受体阻滞剂。临床试验的“新浪潮”。
Drugs. 1999 Aug;58(2):203-10. doi: 10.2165/00003495-199958020-00001.
4
A comparative analysis of the results from 4 trials of beta-blocker therapy for heart failure: BEST, CIBIS-II, MERIT-HF, and COPERNICUS.对4项心力衰竭β受体阻滞剂治疗试验(BEST、CIBIS-II、MERIT-HF和COPERNICUS)结果的比较分析。
J Card Fail. 2003 Oct;9(5):354-63. doi: 10.1054/s1071-9164(03)00133-7.
5
Influence of global region on outcomes in heart failure β-blocker trials.全球地域对心力衰竭β受体阻滞剂试验结果的影响。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011 Aug 23;58(9):915-22. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2011.03.057.
6
[The use of beta blockers in heart failure: clinical studies].[β受体阻滞剂在心力衰竭中的应用:临床研究]
Ital Heart J Suppl. 2000 Aug;1(8):996-1002.
7
Are beta-blockers as efficacious in patients with diabetes mellitus as in patients without diabetes mellitus who have chronic heart failure? A meta-analysis of large-scale clinical trials.β受体阻滞剂对糖尿病合并慢性心力衰竭患者的疗效是否与非糖尿病慢性心力衰竭患者相同?一项大规模临床试验的荟萃分析。
Am Heart J. 2003 Nov;146(5):848-53. doi: 10.1016/S0002-8703(03)00403-4.
8
Perioperative beta-blockers for preventing surgery-related mortality and morbidity.围手术期使用β受体阻滞剂预防手术相关的死亡率和发病率。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Sep 18(9):CD004476. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004476.pub2.
9
β-Blockers for the prevention of sudden cardiac death in heart failure patients: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.β 受体阻滞剂预防心力衰竭患者心源性猝死:随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2013 Jul 13;13:52. doi: 10.1186/1471-2261-13-52.
10
Beta-adrenergic blocking agents in heart failure: benefits of vasodilating and non-vasodilating agents according to patients' characteristics: a meta-analysis of clinical trials.心力衰竭中的β-肾上腺素能阻滞剂:根据患者特征分析血管扩张剂和非血管扩张剂的益处:一项临床试验的荟萃分析
Arch Intern Med. 2000 Mar 13;160(5):621-7. doi: 10.1001/archinte.160.5.621.

引用本文的文献

1
Atrial Shunting for Heart Failure.用于心力衰竭的心房分流术。
Struct Heart. 2025 Jul 19;9(8):100704. doi: 10.1016/j.shj.2025.100704. eCollection 2025 Aug.
2
Beta Blockade Prevents Cardiac Morphological and Molecular Remodelling in Experimental Uremia.β受体阻滞剂可预防实验性尿毒症中心脏形态和分子重构。
Int J Mol Sci. 2023 Dec 27;25(1):373. doi: 10.3390/ijms25010373.
3
Reviewing the Modern Therapeutical Options and the Outcomes of Sacubitril/Valsartan in Heart Failure.探讨沙库巴曲缬沙坦在心力衰竭中的现代治疗选择和结局。
Int J Mol Sci. 2022 Sep 26;23(19):11336. doi: 10.3390/ijms231911336.
4
Renal Sympathetic Denervation for Hypertension.肾交感神经去神经术治疗高血压
Kidney Int Rep. 2022 Jul 14;7(10):2129-2140. doi: 10.1016/j.ekir.2022.06.019. eCollection 2022 Oct.
5
Regulation of the microvasculature during small muscle mass exercise in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease vs. chronic heart failure.慢性阻塞性肺疾病与慢性心力衰竭患者小肌肉量运动期间微血管系统的调节
Front Physiol. 2022 Aug 31;13:979359. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2022.979359. eCollection 2022.
6
Acute but not chronic heart failure is associated with higher mortality among patients hospitalized with pneumonia: An analysis of a nationwide database.急性而非慢性心力衰竭与肺炎住院患者较高的死亡率相关:一项全国性数据库分析。
Am J Med Open. 2022 Jun;7:100013. doi: 10.1016/j.ajmo.2022.100013. Epub 2022 May 5.
7
Effect of Ling-Gui-Zhu-Gan decoction major components on the plasma protein binding of metoprolol using UPLC analysis coupled with ultrafiltration.采用超高效液相色谱(UPLC)分析结合超滤法研究苓桂术甘汤主要成分对美托洛尔血浆蛋白结合率的影响。
RSC Adv. 2018 Oct 22;8(63):35981-35988. doi: 10.1039/c8ra07153e.
8
Current concept in the diagnosis, treatment and rehabilitation of patients with congestive heart failure.充血性心力衰竭患者诊断、治疗及康复的当前理念
World J Cardiol. 2021 Jul 26;13(7):183-203. doi: 10.4330/wjc.v13.i7.183.
9
Effectiveness of Metoprolol in Improving Cardiac and Motor Functions in Patients with Chronic Heart Failure: A Prospective Study.美托洛尔改善慢性心力衰竭患者心脏和运动功能的有效性:一项前瞻性研究。
Drug Des Devel Ther. 2020 Aug 25;14:3485-3494. doi: 10.2147/DDDT.S263026. eCollection 2020.
10
Prevalence and predictors of frailty in a high-income developing country: A cross-sectional study.高收入发展中国家衰弱的患病率及预测因素:一项横断面研究。
Qatar Med J. 2020 Jan 23;2019(3):20. doi: 10.5339/qmj.2019.20. eCollection 2019.