Suppr超能文献

痉挛性双侧瘫步态的矫形治疗

Orthotic management of gait in spastic diplegia.

作者信息

Carlson W E, Vaughan C L, Damiano D L, Abel M F

机构信息

Kluge Children's Rehabilitation Center, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA.

出版信息

Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 1997 May-Jun;76(3):219-25. doi: 10.1097/00002060-199705000-00012.

Abstract

Orthoses are the primary conservative treatment option for control of dynamic equinus in spastic cerebral palsy. Our purpose was to compare the effects of a fixed ankle-foot orthosis (AFO), a supramalleolar orthosis (SMO), and a no-brace condition, but including shoes. Gait analyses were performed on 11 children with spastic diplegia, using a system with four cameras and two concealed force plates. Ensemble averages of time-distance, kinematic, and kinetic parameters were obtained for each condition, and a repeated measures analysis of variance was performed (P < 0.05). Among the important findings were as follows: (1) AFOs significantly reduced ankle excursion, increased dorsiflexion angle at foot strike, increased plantar flexion moment in push-off, decreased ankle power absorbed during loading response, and decreased ankle power generated in push-off; (2) SMOs did not restrict ankle range of motion or significantly alter the power and moment values at the ankle joint. Although neither brace changed stride length and walking speed, AFOs did offer some biomechanical benefits to the child with spastic diplegia, whereas SMOs appeared to have very little measurable effect.

摘要

矫形器是控制痉挛性脑瘫动态马蹄足的主要保守治疗选择。我们的目的是比较固定踝足矫形器(AFO)、超踝关节矫形器(SMO)以及不使用支具但穿鞋子这三种情况的效果。对11名痉挛性双侧瘫患儿进行了步态分析,采用的系统有四个摄像头和两个隐藏式测力板。针对每种情况获取了时间-距离、运动学和动力学参数的总体平均值,并进行了重复测量方差分析(P < 0.05)。重要发现如下:(1)AFO显著减少了踝关节活动度,增加了足跟着地时的背屈角度,增加了蹬离时的跖屈力矩,减少了负重反应期间踝关节吸收的功率,以及减少了蹬离时踝关节产生的功率;(2)SMO并未限制踝关节活动范围,也未显著改变踝关节的功率和力矩值。尽管两种支具都未改变步长和步行速度,但AFO确实为痉挛性双侧瘫患儿带来了一些生物力学益处,而SMO似乎几乎没有可测量的效果。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验