• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在全科医疗中,兰索拉唑每日30毫克与雷尼替丁每日两次、每次150毫克治疗酸相关性消化不良的比较。

Lansoprazole 30 mg daily versus ranitidine 150 mg b.d. in the treatment of acid-related dyspepsia in general practice.

作者信息

Jones R H, Baxter G

机构信息

Department of General Practice, UMDS (Guy's and St Thomas's), London, UK.

出版信息

Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 1997 Jun;11(3):541-6. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2036.1997.00179.x.

DOI:10.1046/j.1365-2036.1997.00179.x
PMID:9218080
Abstract

AIM

To compare lansoprazole 30 mg daily with ranitidine 150 mg b.d. in the treatment of acid-related dyspepsia in general practice.

METHODS

In a double-blind, parallel group, randomized, mutlicentre study conducted in 32 general practices in the UK, 213 patients were randomized to receive lansoprazole 30 mg daily, and 219 to receive ranitidine 150 mg b.d., for 4 weeks. All patients had experienced symptoms of reflux-like or ulcer-like dyspepsia on at least 4 of the 7 days prior to the study; 75% had experienced dyspepsia in the past, and 74 of the lansoprazole patients and 77 of the ranitidine patients had documented histories of acid-related disorders, investigating by either radiology or endoscopy.

RESULTS

After 2 weeks 55% of the lansoprazole patients and 33% of the ranitidine group were symptom-free (P = 0.001, chi 2 = 7.12) with corresponding 4-week figures of 69% and 44%, respectively (P = 0.001, chi 2 = 18.03). Similar figures were found at both 2 and 4 weeks for daytime and night-time heartburn and epigastric pain scores; in the lansoprazole group, at 4 weeks, 80% of patients were free of daytime heartburn and 81% of night-time epigastric pain, compared with 55% (P = 0.001, chi 2 = 15.44) and 65% (P = 0.01, chi 2 = 6.10) in the ranitidine group.

CONCLUSION

Superior symptom relief for patients presenting with ulcer-like and reflux-like symptoms in general practice is provided by lansoprazole 30 mg daily compared with ranitidine 150 mg twice daily.

摘要

目的

在全科医疗中比较每日服用30毫克兰索拉唑与每日两次服用150毫克雷尼替丁治疗酸相关性消化不良的效果。

方法

在英国32家全科诊所进行的一项双盲、平行组、随机、多中心研究中,213例患者被随机分配接受每日30毫克兰索拉唑治疗,219例患者接受每日两次150毫克雷尼替丁治疗,为期4周。所有患者在研究前7天中至少有4天出现反流样或溃疡样消化不良症状;75%的患者过去曾有消化不良症状,兰索拉唑组74例患者和雷尼替丁组77例患者有通过放射学或内镜检查记录的酸相关性疾病病史。

结果

2周后,兰索拉唑组55%的患者症状消失,雷尼替丁组为33%(P = 0.001,卡方 = 7.12),4周时相应数据分别为69%和44%(P = 0.001,卡方 = 18.03)。在2周和4周时,白天和夜间烧心及上腹痛评分的情况相似;在兰索拉唑组,4周时,80%的患者白天无烧心症状,81%的患者夜间无上腹痛症状,而雷尼替丁组分别为55%(P = 0.001,卡方 = 15.44)和65%(P = 0.01,卡方 = 6.10)。

结论

在全科医疗中,对于出现溃疡样和反流样症状的患者,每日服用30毫克兰索拉唑比每日两次服用150毫克雷尼替丁能更有效地缓解症状。

相似文献

1
Lansoprazole 30 mg daily versus ranitidine 150 mg b.d. in the treatment of acid-related dyspepsia in general practice.在全科医疗中,兰索拉唑每日30毫克与雷尼替丁每日两次、每次150毫克治疗酸相关性消化不良的比较。
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 1997 Jun;11(3):541-6. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2036.1997.00179.x.
2
Low-dose lansoprazole provides greater relief of heartburn and epigastric pain than low-dose omeprazole in patients with acid-related dyspepsia.在患有酸相关性消化不良的患者中,低剂量兰索拉唑比低剂量奥美拉唑能更有效地缓解烧心和上腹部疼痛。
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 1999 Mar;13(3):413-9. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2036.1999.00455.x.
3
Lansoprazole compared with ranitidine for the treatment of nonerosive gastroesophageal reflux disease.兰索拉唑与雷尼替丁治疗非糜烂性胃食管反流病的比较。
Arch Intern Med. 2000 Jun 26;160(12):1803-9. doi: 10.1001/archinte.160.12.1803.
4
Improved symptom relief and duodenal ulcer healing with lansoprazole, a new proton pump inhibitor, compared with ranitidine.与雷尼替丁相比,新型质子泵抑制剂兰索拉唑能更有效地缓解症状并促进十二指肠溃疡愈合。
Gut. 1993 Oct;34(10):1458-62. doi: 10.1136/gut.34.10.1458.
5
Lansoprazole heals erosive reflux esophagitis resistant to histamine H2-receptor antagonist therapy.兰索拉唑可治愈对组胺H2受体拮抗剂疗法耐药的糜烂性反流性食管炎。
Am J Gastroenterol. 1997 Mar;92(3):429-37.
6
Lansoprazole versus ranitidine for the treatment of reflux oesophagitis. UK Lansoprazole Clinical Research Group.兰索拉唑与雷尼替丁治疗反流性食管炎的对比研究。英国兰索拉唑临床研究小组。
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 1995 Apr;9(2):145-51. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.1995.tb00363.x.
7
The management of acid-related dyspepsia in general practice: a comparison of an omeprazole versus an antacid-alginate/ranitidine management strategy. Compete Research Group [corrected].全科医疗中酸相关性消化不良的管理:奥美拉唑与抗酸剂-藻酸盐/雷尼替丁管理策略的比较。竞争研究小组[已校正]
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 1998 Mar;12(3):263-71. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2036.1998.00282.x.
8
Double-blind comparison of lansoprazole, ranitidine, and placebo in the treatment of acute duodenal ulcer. Lansoprazole Study Group.兰索拉唑、雷尼替丁和安慰剂治疗急性十二指肠溃疡的双盲比较。兰索拉唑研究组。
Am J Gastroenterol. 1994 Aug;89(8):1191-200.
9
Superiority of lansoprazole vs ranitidine in healing nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug-associated gastric ulcers: results of a double-blind, randomized, multicenter study. NSAID-Associated Gastric Ulcer Study Group.兰索拉唑与雷尼替丁治疗非甾体抗炎药相关性胃溃疡的疗效比较:一项双盲、随机、多中心研究的结果。非甾体抗炎药相关性胃溃疡研究组
Arch Intern Med. 2000 May 22;160(10):1455-61. doi: 10.1001/archinte.160.10.1455.
10
Rapid symptom relief in reflux oesophagitis: a comparison of lansoprazole and omeprazole.反流性食管炎症状的快速缓解:兰索拉唑与奥美拉唑的比较
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 1996 Oct;10(5):757-63. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2036.1996.56198000.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparing the Safety and Efficacy of Proton Pump Inhibitors and Histamine-2 Receptor Antagonists in the Management of Patients With Peptic Ulcer Disease: A Systematic Review.比较质子泵抑制剂和组胺-2受体拮抗剂在消化性溃疡疾病患者管理中的安全性和有效性:一项系统评价
Cureus. 2023 Aug 29;15(8):e44341. doi: 10.7759/cureus.44341. eCollection 2023 Aug.
2
Proton pump inhibitor monotherapy is effective to attenuate dyspepsia symptoms associated with gastroesophageal reflux disease: a multicenter prospective observational study.质子泵抑制剂单药治疗有效缓解胃食管反流病相关消化不良症状:一项多中心前瞻性观察研究。
J Gastroenterol. 2019 Jun;54(6):492-500. doi: 10.1007/s00535-019-01546-0. Epub 2019 Jan 23.
3
Proton pump inhibitors for functional dyspepsia.
用于功能性消化不良的质子泵抑制剂。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Nov 21;11(11):CD011194. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011194.pub3.
4
ACG and CAG Clinical Guideline: Management of Dyspepsia.ACG 和 CAG 临床指南:消化不良的管理。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2017 Jul;112(7):988-1013. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2017.154. Epub 2017 Jun 20.
5
Deprescribing versus continuation of chronic proton pump inhibitor use in adults.成人慢性质子泵抑制剂的撤药与继续用药对比
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Mar 16;3(3):CD011969. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011969.pub2.
6
Proton pump inhibitors for functional dyspepsia.用于功能性消化不良的质子泵抑制剂。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Mar 8;3(3):CD011194. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011194.pub2.
7
Efficacy of magnetic sphincter augmentation in patients with large hiatal hernias.磁括约肌增强术治疗大型食管裂孔疝患者的疗效
Surg Endosc. 2017 May;31(5):2096-2102. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-5204-3. Epub 2016 Aug 23.
8
Proton pump inhibitor after endoscopic resection for esophageal squamous cell cancer: multicenter prospective randomized controlled trial.内镜切除术后质子泵抑制剂用于食管鳞状细胞癌:多中心前瞻性随机对照试验
J Gastroenterol. 2016 Feb;51(2):104-11. doi: 10.1007/s00535-015-1085-9. Epub 2015 May 5.
9
Visceral hypersensitivity and electromechanical dysfunction as therapeutic targets in pediatric functional dyspepsia.内脏高敏感性和机电功能障碍作为儿童功能性消化不良的治疗靶点。
World J Gastrointest Pharmacol Ther. 2014 Aug 6;5(3):122-38. doi: 10.4292/wjgpt.v5.i3.122.
10
Association of symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux with metabolic syndrome parameters in patients with endocrine disease.内分泌疾病患者胃食管反流症状与代谢综合征参数的关联
ISRN Gastroenterol. 2014 Jan 30;2014:863206. doi: 10.1155/2014/863206. eCollection 2014.