• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

不同骑行姿势对精英自行车运动员代谢成本的影响。

Influence of different racing positions on metabolic cost in elite cyclists.

作者信息

Gnehm P, Reichenbach S, Altpeter E, Widmer H, Hoppeler H

机构信息

Department of Anatomy, University of Bern, Switzerland.

出版信息

Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1997 Jun;29(6):818-23. doi: 10.1097/00005768-199706000-00013.

DOI:10.1097/00005768-199706000-00013
PMID:9219211
Abstract

The spectacular improvements of the 1-h world record in cycling in the last four years have highlighted the importance of aerodynamics in modern bicycle racing. We have investigated the metabolic consequences of the low-crouched aero-positions necessary to reduce air drag. In this study, 14 elite male bicycle racers (24.0 +/- 1.0 yr, VO2max 69.4 +/- 0.5 mL.kg-1.min-1) were tested for oxygen consumption (VO2) and heart rate (HR) at 70% (302.6 +/- 5.3 W) of their individual VO2max in three different riding positions during a single test run. The subjects rode their racing bicycles on a wind braked roller; the sequence of the three following positions was randomized: 1) upright cycling (UP), cadence 90 rpm; 2) hands on drops (DP), 90 rpm; and 3) hands on clip-on aero-handlebars (AP), 90 rpm. VO2 and HR values in AP were significantly higher by 1.5 mL.kg-1.min-1 and 5 beats.min-1, respectively, compared with UP. We concluded that riding a bicycle in an extreme aero-position increases the metabolic cost of cycling when wind resistance is not taken into account. However, when the mechanical power losses of 9 W (estimated by the VO2 increase) are compared with the expected aerodynamic power savings of approximately 100 W, it appears that aerodynamic advantages by far outweight their metabolic cost.

摘要

过去四年里,自行车项目1小时世界纪录的显著提升凸显了空气动力学在现代自行车比赛中的重要性。我们研究了为减少空气阻力而采用的低蹲姿空气动力学姿势所带来的代谢影响。在本研究中,14名精英男性自行车赛车手(年龄24.0±1.0岁,最大摄氧量69.4±0.5 mL·kg⁻¹·min⁻¹)在单次测试骑行中,于三种不同骑行姿势下,以其个人最大摄氧量的70%(302.6±5.3瓦)测试耗氧量(VO₂)和心率(HR)。受试者在带风阻刹车的滚筒上骑他们的赛车;以下三种姿势的顺序是随机的:1)直立骑行(UP),踏频90转/分钟;2)手握下把位(DP),踏频90转/分钟;3)手握夹式空气动力学车把(AP),踏频90转/分钟。与UP相比,AP的VO₂和HR值分别显著高出1.5 mL·kg⁻¹·min⁻¹和5次/分钟。我们得出结论,在不考虑风阻的情况下,以极端空气动力学姿势骑自行车会增加骑行的代谢成本。然而,当将9瓦的机械功率损失(通过VO₂增加估算)与预计约100瓦的空气动力学功率节省相比较时,空气动力学优势似乎远远超过其代谢成本。

相似文献

1
Influence of different racing positions on metabolic cost in elite cyclists.不同骑行姿势对精英自行车运动员代谢成本的影响。
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1997 Jun;29(6):818-23. doi: 10.1097/00005768-199706000-00013.
2
The effect of body position on the energy cost of cycling.身体姿势对骑行能量消耗的影响。
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1991 Aug;23(8):949-53.
3
Effect of cycling position on ventilatory and metabolic variables.骑行姿势对通气和代谢变量的影响。
Int J Sports Med. 1998 Jul;19(5):336-41. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-971927.
4
Comparison of aero-bars versus traditional cycling postures on physiological parameters during submaximal cycling.次最大强度骑行期间,空气动力学车把与传统骑行姿势对生理参数影响的比较。
Can J Appl Physiol. 1996 Feb;21(1):16-22. doi: 10.1139/h96-002.
5
A comparison between aero and standard racing handlebars during prolonged exercise.长时间运动期间航空竞赛车把与标准竞赛车把的比较。
Int J Sports Med. 1994 Jan;15(1):16-20. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-1021013.
6
Body mass scaling of frontal area in competitive cyclists not using aero-handlebars.不使用空气动力学车把的竞技自行车运动员的身体质量与 frontal area 的比例关系 。 注:这里“frontal area”直译为“正面面积”,在自行车领域可能有特定含义,可结合具体语境进一步理解其确切所指。
Eur J Appl Physiol. 2002 Oct;87(6):520-8. doi: 10.1007/s00421-002-0662-9. Epub 2002 Jul 5.
7
Effect of air resistance on the metabolic cost and performance of cycling.
Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol. 1980;45(2-3):245-54. doi: 10.1007/BF00421332.
8
Effect of different bicycle body positions on power output in aerobically trained females.不同自行车体位对有氧训练女性输出功率的影响。
Res Sports Med. 2011 Oct;19(4):245-58. doi: 10.1080/15438627.2011.608039.
9
Body position affects performance in untrained cyclists.身体姿势会影响未经训练的自行车骑行者的表现。
Br J Sports Med. 2003;37(5):441-4. doi: 10.1136/bjsm.37.5.441.
10
The physiological effects of cycling on tandem and single bicycles.双人自行车和单人自行车骑行的生理效应。
Br J Sports Med. 2003 Feb;37(1):50-3; discussion 53. doi: 10.1136/bjsm.37.1.50.

引用本文的文献

1
The effect of posture on maximal oxygen uptake in active healthy individuals.姿势对活跃健康个体最大摄氧量的影响。
Eur J Appl Physiol. 2021 May;121(5):1487-1498. doi: 10.1007/s00421-021-04630-7. Epub 2021 Feb 27.
2
Musculoskeletal Model Personalization Affects Metabolic Cost Estimates for Walking.肌肉骨骼模型个性化会影响步行的代谢成本估计。
Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2020 Nov 26;8:588925. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2020.588925. eCollection 2020.
3
The effects of bicycle frame geometry on muscle activation and power during a wingate anaerobic test.
自行车车架几何形状对 WINGATE 无氧测试中肌肉激活和功率的影响。
J Sports Sci Med. 2006 Mar 1;5(1):25-32. eCollection 2006.
4
Influence of road incline and body position on power-cadence relationship in endurance cycling.道路坡度和身体姿势对耐力骑行功率-踏频关系的影响。
Eur J Appl Physiol. 2012 Jul;112(7):2433-41. doi: 10.1007/s00421-011-2213-8. Epub 2011 Nov 2.
5
Changes in heart rate recovery after high-intensity training in well-trained cyclists.训练有素的自行车运动员进行高强度训练后心率恢复情况的变化。
Eur J Appl Physiol. 2009 Mar;105(5):705-13. doi: 10.1007/s00421-008-0952-y. Epub 2008 Dec 20.
6
The science of cycling: factors affecting performance - part 2.骑行科学:影响骑行表现的因素 - 第二部分
Sports Med. 2005;35(4):313-37. doi: 10.2165/00007256-200535040-00003.
7
The science of cycling: physiology and training - part 1.骑行科学:生理学与训练——第1部分
Sports Med. 2005;35(4):285-312. doi: 10.2165/00007256-200535040-00002.
8
Body position affects performance in untrained cyclists.身体姿势会影响未经训练的自行车骑行者的表现。
Br J Sports Med. 2003;37(5):441-4. doi: 10.1136/bjsm.37.5.441.
9
The physiological effects of cycling on tandem and single bicycles.双人自行车和单人自行车骑行的生理效应。
Br J Sports Med. 2003 Feb;37(1):50-3; discussion 53. doi: 10.1136/bjsm.37.1.50.