• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[Quality in public health. Deficits, concepts and political quality key issues from the ministerial viewpoint].

作者信息

Ruprecht T M

机构信息

Behörde für Arbeit, Gesundheit und Soziales Hamburg.

出版信息

Z Arztl Fortbild Qualitatssich. 1997 Feb;91(1):75-81.

PMID:9221209
Abstract

To preserve the quality of the German health care system as well as continuously optimize it towards the needs stated by ethics and law, an inter-professional and inter-institutional quality policy is required. It should be patient-centered, focus on process management and be based on EN ISO-Standards adapted to the specific needs of health care. The latter could provide internationally compatible models for quality management and quality improvement including economic efficiency. The 40 nation Council of Europe's 5th European Conference of Health Ministers in Warsaw as well as the 69th Conference of German Federal State Health Ministers (GMK) at Cottbus, who tackled the issue in November 1996, pointed out essential aspects. The GMK stated a lack of effective general concepts, quality control and patients' rights protection in Germany. Both conferences demanded equity, social justice and an active participation of patients in the setting of quality standards and the conception, functioning and control of health care. This includes rationalisations by using the limited funds in a most effective way.

摘要

相似文献

1
[Quality in public health. Deficits, concepts and political quality key issues from the ministerial viewpoint].
Z Arztl Fortbild Qualitatssich. 1997 Feb;91(1):75-81.
2
[Quality management from the viewpoint of the Federal Public Health Ministry].[从联邦公共卫生部的视角看质量管理]
Herz. 1996 Oct;21(5):299-303.
3
Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany.德国药品效益评估的程序和方法。
Eur J Health Econ. 2008 Nov;9 Suppl 1:5-29. doi: 10.1007/s10198-008-0122-5.
4
[Long-term goals of public health legislation].
Langenbecks Arch Chir Suppl Kongressbd. 1996;113:672-5.
5
[Quality assurance in medical care].
Gesundheitswesen. 1996 Aug-Sep;58(8-9):447-53.
6
[Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany].[德国药品效益评估的程序和方法]
Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 2008 Dec;133 Suppl 7:S225-46. doi: 10.1055/s-0028-1100954. Epub 2008 Nov 25.
7
[Evaluation of Federal Health Insurance process data as instrument for structural and quality analysis of inpatient care].
Gesundheitswesen. 1997 Jan;59(1):10-6.
8
[Changes in the spectrum of the health provision contract and their effects on education, graduate education, research, quality of treatment and continuing development of surgery].[医疗服务合同范围的变化及其对教育、研究生教育、研究、治疗质量和外科手术持续发展的影响]
Langenbecks Arch Chir Suppl Kongressbd. 1996;113:663-6.
9
[Introduction of disease management programmes in Germany as reflected by differing interests of health insurance companies and the federal association of statutory health insurance physicians].[德国疾病管理项目的引入:健康保险公司与法定医疗保险医师联邦协会不同利益之体现]
Gesundheitswesen. 2002 Nov;64(11):572-7. doi: 10.1055/s-2002-35538.
10
[Quality assurance and continuous quality improvement--assessment of the current status of physician self-control for quality assurance in medicine 1955-1995].[质量保证与持续质量改进——1955 - 1995年医学领域医师质量保证自我控制现状评估]
Gesundheitswesen. 1996 Jul;58(7):360-71.