Stratford P W, Goldsmith C H
School of Rehabilitation Science, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Phys Ther. 1997 Jul;77(7):745-50. doi: 10.1093/ptj/77.7.745.
The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and the standard error of measurement (SEM) are two reliability coefficients that are reported frequently. Both measures are related; however, they define distinctly different properties. The magnitude of the ICC defines a measure's ability to discriminate among subjects, and the SEM quantifies error in the same units as the original measurement. Most of the statistical methodology addressing reliability presented in the physical therapy literature (eg, point and interval estimations, sample size calculations) focuses on the ICC. Using actual elbow flexor make and break strength measurements, this article illustrates a method for estimating a confidence interval for the SEM, shows how an a priori specification of confidence interval width can be used to estimate sample size, and provides several approaches for comparing error variances (and square root of the error variance, or the SEM).
组内相关系数(ICC)和测量标准误差(SEM)是经常被报道的两个可靠性系数。这两种测量方法是相关的;然而,它们定义了截然不同的属性。ICC的大小定义了一种测量方法区分受试者的能力,而SEM则以与原始测量相同的单位量化误差。物理治疗文献中提出的大多数关于可靠性的统计方法(例如,点估计和区间估计、样本量计算)都集中在ICC上。本文使用实际的肘部屈肌离合强度测量数据,阐述了一种估计SEM置信区间的方法,展示了如何使用置信区间宽度的先验规范来估计样本量,并提供了几种比较误差方差(以及误差方差的平方根,即SEM)的方法。