Grabowski H, Mullins C D
Duke University, Department of Economics, Durham, NC 27708-0097, USA.
Soc Sci Med. 1997 Aug;45(4):535-44. doi: 10.1016/s0277-9536(96)00394-2.
Pharmacy benefit management companies (PBMs) have evolved over the past decade in response to the increased demand for health care cost containment. Their activities include the implementation of drug formularies and the negotiation of rebates from manufacturers. Our analysis of this industry is based on interviews and materials provided by the top five ranked PBM companies which account for over 80% of beneficiaries covered within formulary plans. The formularies of these companies are relatively inclusive, but they are becoming more restrictive over time. At present the use of cost-effectiveness (C-E) studies in the formulary decisions of PBMs has been limited. In this regard, the surveyed PBMs emphasized that most C-E studies have not compared therapeutic substitutes in populations with characteristics that are similar to those of their clients. Pharmacy benefit management companies also have had strong incentives to focus narrowly on drug costs because they typically manage drug benefits on a "carved-out" basis. However, PBMs anticipate a growing future role in the integrated management of patient care (disease management) for certain high cost chronic diseases and conditions. All of the leading firms we surveyed have disease management programs in development. The importance of C-E studies to PBM decisions is expected to increase significantly as disease management programs are implemented. The data infrastructure inherent to the PBM industry and the increasing number of employees with advanced training in pharmacoeconomics will permit firms to perform their own internal C-E studies. They are also establishing various alliances and joint ventures with drug manufacturers, health maintenance organizations, and academic institutions to perform these analyses. The leading PBMs tend to favor active participation in the development of methodological approaches to C-E studies over government regulations such as those proposed by the FDA in 1995.
在过去十年中,药房福利管理公司(PBM)为响应控制医疗保健成本的需求而不断发展。它们的活动包括实施药品处方集以及与制造商协商回扣。我们对该行业的分析基于排名前五的PBM公司提供的访谈和资料,这五家公司覆盖了处方集计划中超过80%的受益人。这些公司的处方集相对具有包容性,但随着时间的推移,它们正变得更加严格。目前,成本效益(C-E)研究在PBM的处方集决策中的应用有限。在这方面,接受调查的PBM强调,大多数C-E研究没有在与客户特征相似的人群中比较治疗替代方案。药房福利管理公司也一直有强烈的动机将重点狭隘地放在药品成本上,因为它们通常在“剥离”基础上管理药品福利。然而,PBM预计在某些高成本慢性病和病症的患者综合护理管理(疾病管理)中未来将发挥越来越大的作用。我们调查的所有领先公司都在开发疾病管理项目。随着疾病管理项目的实施,C-E研究对PBM决策的重要性预计将显著增加。PBM行业固有的数据基础设施以及接受过药物经济学高级培训的员工数量不断增加,将使公司能够开展自己的内部C-E研究。它们还在与药品制造商、健康维护组织和学术机构建立各种联盟和合资企业来进行这些分析。领先的PBM倾向于积极参与C-E研究方法的开发,而不是遵循政府法规,如美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)1995年提出的那些法规。