Dickman P W, Gibberd R W, Hakulinen T
Department of Cancer Epidemiology, Radiumhemmet, Karolinska Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
J Epidemiol Community Health. 1997 Jun;51(3):289-98. doi: 10.1136/jech.51.3.289.
To examine equity in the health care system with regard to cancer patient care by estimating the level of systematic regional variation in cancer survival in the Nordic countries. Specifically, those cancer sites which exhibit high levels of systematic regional variation in survival and hence inequity were identified. Estimating the reduction in cancer deaths which could be achieved by eliminating this variation so that everyone receives effective care will provide a readily interpretable measure of the amount of systematic regional variation. A comprehensive analysis of regional variation in survival has not previously been conducted so appropriate statistical methodology must be developed.
All those aged 0-90 years who had been diagnosed with at least one of 12 common malignant neoplasms between 1977 and 1992 in Denmark, Finland, Norway, and Sweden.
A separate analysis was conducted for each country. Regression models for the relative survival ratio were used to estimate the relative risk of excess mortality attributable to cancer in each region after correcting for age and sex. An estimate of the amount of systematic regional variation in survival was obtained by subtracting the estimated expected random variation from the observed regional variation. An estimate was then made of the potential reduction in the number of cancer deaths for 2008-12 if regional variation in survival were eliminated so that everyone received the same level of effective care.
Between 2008 and 2012, an estimated 2.5% of deaths from cancers in the 12 sites studied could be prevented by eliminating regional variation in survival. The percentage of potentially avoidable deaths did not depend on country or sex but it did depend on cancer site. There was no relationship between the level of regional variation in a given country and the level of survival. The cancer sites for which the greatest percentage savings could be achieved were melanoma (11%) and cervix uteri (6%). The sites for which the highest number of deaths could be prevented were prostate, colon, melanoma, and breast.
This methodology showed a small amount of systematic regional variation in cancer survival in the Nordic countries. The cancer sites with high levels of regional variation identified are potential targets for cancer control programmes.
通过估计北欧国家癌症生存率的系统性区域差异水平,来考察医疗保健系统在癌症患者护理方面的公平性。具体而言,确定那些在生存率上表现出高水平系统性区域差异因而存在不公平现象的癌症部位。估计消除这种差异(以便每个人都能获得有效护理)所能实现的癌症死亡人数的减少,将提供一种易于解释的系统性区域差异量度。此前尚未对生存率的区域差异进行全面分析,因此必须开发合适的统计方法。
1977年至1992年间在丹麦、芬兰、挪威和瑞典被诊断患有12种常见恶性肿瘤中至少一种的所有0至90岁的人。
对每个国家进行单独分析。使用相对生存率的回归模型,在校正年龄和性别后,估计每个地区因癌症导致的额外死亡的相对风险。通过从观察到的区域差异中减去估计的预期随机差异,获得生存率系统性区域差异量的估计值。然后估计如果消除生存率的区域差异,使每个人都能获得相同水平的有效护理,2008 - 2012年癌症死亡人数可能减少的数量。
在2008年至2012年期间,通过消除生存率的区域差异,估计可预防所研究的12个部位癌症死亡人数的2.5%。潜在可避免死亡的百分比不取决于国家或性别,但确实取决于癌症部位。给定国家的区域差异水平与生存率水平之间没有关系。可实现最大百分比节省的癌症部位是黑色素瘤(11%)和子宫颈癌(6%)。可预防死亡人数最多的部位是前列腺癌、结肠癌、黑色素瘤和乳腺癌。
该方法显示北欧国家癌症生存率存在少量系统性区域差异。所确定的具有高水平区域差异的癌症部位是癌症控制计划的潜在目标。