• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Estimation of the Potentially Avoidable Excess Deaths Associated with Socioeconomic Inequalities in Cancer Survival in Germany.德国癌症生存社会经济不平等相关潜在可避免的额外死亡估计
Cancers (Basel). 2021 Jan 19;13(2):357. doi: 10.3390/cancers13020357.
2
Small-area analysis on socioeconomic inequalities in cancer survival for 25 cancer sites in Germany.德国 25 个癌症部位的癌症生存的社会经济不平等的小区域分析。
Int J Cancer. 2021 Aug 1;149(3):561-572. doi: 10.1002/ijc.33553. Epub 2021 Mar 24.
3
How many deaths would be avoidable if socioeconomic inequalities in cancer survival in England were eliminated? A national population-based study, 1996-2006.如果消除英格兰癌症生存率中的社会经济不平等现象,将会避免多少死亡?一项基于全国人口的研究,1996-2006 年。
Eur J Cancer. 2012 Jan;48(2):270-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2011.10.008. Epub 2011 Nov 15.
4
Socioeconomic deprivation and cancer survival in Germany: an ecological analysis in 200 districts in Germany.社会经济剥夺与德国癌症患者生存状况:德国 200 个区的生态学分析
Int J Cancer. 2014 Jun 15;134(12):2951-60. doi: 10.1002/ijc.28624. Epub 2013 Dec 2.
5
Trends in cancer incidence by socioeconomic deprivation in Germany in 2007 to 2018: An ecological registry-based study.2007 年至 2018 年德国按社会经济贫困程度划分的癌症发病率趋势:基于生态登记的研究。
Int J Cancer. 2023 Nov 15;153(10):1784-1796. doi: 10.1002/ijc.34662. Epub 2023 Aug 4.
6
Socioeconomic deprivation and cancer survival in a metropolitan area: An analysis of cancer registry data from Hamburg, Germany.大都市地区的社会经济剥夺与癌症生存率:对德国汉堡癌症登记数据的分析
Lancet Reg Health Eur. 2021 Feb 26;4:100063. doi: 10.1016/j.lanepe.2021.100063. eCollection 2021 May.
7
What if cancer survival in Britain were the same as in Europe: how many deaths are avoidable?如果英国的癌症存活率与欧洲相同:有多少死亡是可以避免的?
Br J Cancer. 2009 Dec 3;101 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S115-24. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6605401.
8
Area-Based Socioeconomic Inequalities in Colorectal Cancer Survival in Germany: Investigation Based on Population-Based Clinical Cancer Registration.德国结直肠癌生存方面基于地区的社会经济不平等:基于人群的临床癌症登记调查
Front Oncol. 2020 May 29;10:857. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2020.00857. eCollection 2020.
9
Widening area-based socioeconomic inequalities in cancer mortality in Germany between 2003 and 2019.2003 年至 2019 年期间,德国基于地区的癌症死亡率的社会经济不平等状况不断扩大。
Sci Rep. 2023 Oct 19;13(1):17833. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-45254-5.
10
How much of the deprivation gap in cancer survival can be explained by variation in stage at diagnosis: an example from breast cancer in the East of England.在癌症生存方面,由于诊断时的分期差异而导致的剥夺差距有多大:来自英格兰东部乳腺癌的一个例子。
Int J Cancer. 2013 Nov;133(9):2192-200. doi: 10.1002/ijc.28221. Epub 2013 May 29.

引用本文的文献

1
Association of Smoking, Comorbidity, Clinical Stage, and Treatment Intent With Socioeconomic Differences in Survival After Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma in Denmark.丹麦口咽鳞状细胞癌患者的生存与吸烟、合并症、临床分期和治疗意向与社会经济差异的关系。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Dec 1;5(12):e2245510. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.45510.
2
Area Deprivation and COVID-19 Incidence and Mortality in Bavaria, Germany: A Bayesian Geographical Analysis.德国巴伐利亚地区的贫困与 COVID-19 发病率和死亡率:一项贝叶斯地理分析。
Front Public Health. 2022 Jul 15;10:927658. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.927658. eCollection 2022.
3
Socioeconomic disparities in endometrial cancer survival in Germany: a survival analysis using population-based cancer registry data.德国子宫内膜癌生存的社会经济差异:基于人群癌症登记数据的生存分析。
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2022 May;148(5):1087-1095. doi: 10.1007/s00432-021-03908-9. Epub 2022 Jan 22.
4
Non-parametric estimation of reference adjusted, standardised probabilities of all-cause death and death due to cancer for population group comparisons.非参数估计参考调整后、标准化的全因死亡率和癌症死亡率的概率,用于人群比较。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2022 Jan 6;22(1):2. doi: 10.1186/s12874-021-01465-w.
5
Disparities in Cancer-Related Avoidable Mortality by the Level of Area Deprivation in South Korea.韩国地区贫困程度与癌症相关可避免死亡率的差异。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jul 25;18(15):7856. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18157856.

本文引用的文献

1
Area-Based Socioeconomic Inequalities in Colorectal Cancer Survival in Germany: Investigation Based on Population-Based Clinical Cancer Registration.德国结直肠癌生存方面基于地区的社会经济不平等:基于人群的临床癌症登记调查
Front Oncol. 2020 May 29;10:857. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2020.00857. eCollection 2020.
2
Socioeconomic differences and lung cancer survival in Germany: Investigation based on population-based clinical cancer registration.德国的社会经济差异与肺癌生存:基于基于人群的临床癌症登记的调查。
Lung Cancer. 2020 Apr;142:1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2020.01.021. Epub 2020 Feb 4.
3
Do alternative weighting approaches for an Index of Multiple Deprivation change the association with mortality? A sensitivity analysis from Germany.替代加权方法对多重贫困指数与死亡率的关联是否会改变?来自德国的敏感性分析。
BMJ Open. 2019 Aug 26;9(8):e028553. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028553.
4
Socioeconomic environment and disparities in cancer survival for 19 solid tumor sites: An analysis of the French Network of Cancer Registries (FRANCIM) data.19 个实体瘤部位的社会经济环境与癌症生存差异:法国癌症登记处网络(FRANCIM)数据的分析。
Int J Cancer. 2019 Mar 15;144(6):1262-1274. doi: 10.1002/ijc.31951. Epub 2018 Dec 3.
5
Socioeconomic Inequalities in Total and Site-Specific Cancer Incidence in Germany: A Population-Based Registry Study.德国总体及特定部位癌症发病率的社会经济不平等:一项基于人群的登记研究
Front Oncol. 2018 Sep 25;8:402. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2018.00402. eCollection 2018.
6
Effect of Area-Level Deprivation on Cancer Survival Time: A Register-Based Follow-up Study of 145 585 Korean Subjects.地区层面的贫困对癌症生存时间的影响:一项基于登记的对145585名韩国受试者的随访研究。
Asia Pac J Public Health. 2018 Jan;30(1):19-28. doi: 10.1177/1010539517746043. Epub 2017 Dec 7.
7
[Indices of Multiple Deprivation for the analysis of regional health disparities in Germany : Experiences from epidemiology and healthcare research].[用于分析德国地区健康差异的多重剥夺指数:来自流行病学和医疗保健研究的经验]
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2017 Dec;60(12):1403-1412. doi: 10.1007/s00103-017-2646-2.
8
Socioeconomic status and site-specific cancer incidence, a Bayesian approach in a French Cancer Registries Network study.社会经济地位与特定部位癌症发病率:法国癌症登记网络研究中的贝叶斯方法
Eur J Cancer Prev. 2018 Jul;27(4):391-398. doi: 10.1097/CEJ.0000000000000326.
9
Incorporating Environmental Justice into Second Generation Indices of Multiple Deprivation: Lessons from the UK and Progress Internationally.将环境正义纳入第二代多重贫困指数:来自英国的经验教训及国际进展
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2016 Jul 26;13(8):750. doi: 10.3390/ijerph13080750.
10
Neighborhood deprivation and lung cancer incidence and mortality: a multilevel analysis from Sweden.社区剥夺与肺癌发病率和死亡率:来自瑞典的多层次分析。
J Thorac Oncol. 2015 Feb;10(2):256-63. doi: 10.1097/JTO.0000000000000417.

德国癌症生存社会经济不平等相关潜在可避免的额外死亡估计

Estimation of the Potentially Avoidable Excess Deaths Associated with Socioeconomic Inequalities in Cancer Survival in Germany.

作者信息

Jansen Lina, Kanbach Josephine, Finke Isabelle, Arndt Volker, Emrich Katharina, Holleczek Bernd, Kajüter Hiltraud, Kieschke Joachim, Maier Werner, Pritzkuleit Ron, Sirri Eunice, Schwettmann Lars, Erb Cynthia, Brenner Hermann, Group For The German Cancer Survival Working

机构信息

Division of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.

Faculty 11-Human and Health Science, University of Bremen, 28359 Bremen, Germany.

出版信息

Cancers (Basel). 2021 Jan 19;13(2):357. doi: 10.3390/cancers13020357.

DOI:10.3390/cancers13020357
PMID:33478065
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7835812/
Abstract

Many countries have reported survival inequalities due to regional socioeconomic deprivation. To quantify the potential gain from eliminating cancer survival disadvantages associated with area-based deprivation in Germany, we calculated the number of avoidable excess deaths. We used population-based cancer registry data from 11 of 16 German federal states. Patients aged ≥15 years diagnosed with an invasive malignant tumor between 2008 and 2017 were included. Area-based socioeconomic deprivation was assessed using the quintiles of the German Index of Multiple Deprivation (GIMD) 2010 on a municipality level nationwide. Five-year age-standardized relative survival for 25 most common cancer sites and for total cancer were calculated using period analysis. Incidence and number of avoidable excess deaths in Germany in 2013-2016 were estimated. Summed over the 25 cancer sites, 4100 annual excess deaths (3.0% of all excess deaths) could have been avoided each year in Germany during the period 2013-2016 if relative survival were in all regions comparable with the least deprived regions. Colorectal, oral and pharynx, prostate, and bladder cancer contributed the largest numbers of avoidable excess deaths. Our results provide a good basis to estimate the potential of intervention programs for reducing socioeconomic inequalities in cancer burden in Germany.

摘要

许多国家都报告了因地区社会经济贫困导致的生存不平等现象。为了量化消除德国基于地区贫困的癌症生存劣势可能带来的潜在收益,我们计算了可避免的额外死亡人数。我们使用了德国16个联邦州中11个州的基于人群的癌症登记数据。纳入了2008年至2017年间诊断为侵袭性恶性肿瘤的≥15岁患者。在全国城市层面,使用2010年德国多重贫困指数(GIMD)的五分位数评估基于地区的社会经济贫困情况。采用时期分析方法计算了25个最常见癌症部位和所有癌症的五年年龄标准化相对生存率。估计了2013 - 2016年德国可避免的额外死亡的发病率和数量。在2013 - 2016年期间,如果所有地区的相对生存率都与最不贫困地区相当,那么在德国,25个癌症部位每年总计4100例额外死亡(占所有额外死亡的3.0%)本可避免。结直肠癌、口腔和咽癌、前列腺癌以及膀胱癌导致的可避免额外死亡人数最多。我们的结果为评估德国减少癌症负担社会经济不平等干预项目的潜力提供了良好依据。