• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

运用因素分析的Q技术对阅读问题进行分类。

Classification of reading problems by the Q-technique of factor analysis.

作者信息

Doehring D G, Hoshko I M

出版信息

Cortex. 1977 Sep;13(3):281-94. doi: 10.1016/s0010-9452(77)80037-3.

DOI:10.1016/s0010-9452(77)80037-3
PMID:923266
Abstract

The Q-technique of factor analysis was used to define subtypes of reading problems in terms of performance on 31 tests of rapid reading skills. Subjects included a group of 34 children with learning problems, language problems, and mental retardation. Three subgroups were identified within each group by the statistical classification procedure. For the reading group, one subgroup was characterized by slow oral word reading, a second by slow auditory-visual letter association, and a third by slow auditory-visual association of words and syllables. The first and second subgroups for the mixed group were essentially the same as the second and third subgroups for the reading group, and the third subgroup was characterized by slow visual matching. These results were compared with those of previous investigators, none of whom used multivariate correlational procedures for classifying reading disabilities. It was concluded that the use of statistical classification techniques would greatly facilitate the achievement of a consensus regarding the number and the types of developmental reading disabilities.

摘要

因素分析的Q技术被用于根据31项快速阅读技能测试的表现来定义阅读问题的亚型。研究对象包括一组34名有学习问题、语言问题和智力迟钝的儿童。通过统计分类程序在每组中识别出三个亚组。对于阅读组,一个亚组的特征是口头单词阅读慢,第二个亚组的特征是视听字母联想慢,第三个亚组的特征是单词和音节的视听联想慢。混合组的第一和第二个亚组与阅读组的第二和第三个亚组基本相同,第三个亚组的特征是视觉匹配慢。这些结果与以前研究者的结果进行了比较,以前的研究者都没有使用多变量相关程序来对阅读障碍进行分类。得出的结论是,使用统计分类技术将极大地促进就发展性阅读障碍的数量和类型达成共识。

相似文献

1
Classification of reading problems by the Q-technique of factor analysis.运用因素分析的Q技术对阅读问题进行分类。
Cortex. 1977 Sep;13(3):281-94. doi: 10.1016/s0010-9452(77)80037-3.
2
Neural correlates of rapid auditory processing are disrupted in children with developmental dyslexia and ameliorated with training: an fMRI study.发育性阅读障碍儿童快速听觉处理的神经关联被破坏,训练后得到改善:一项功能磁共振成像研究。
Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2007;25(3-4):295-310.
3
Subtyping of children with developmental dyslexia via bootstrap aggregated clustering and the gap statistic: comparison with the double-deficit hypothesis.通过自助聚合聚类和间隙统计对发育性阅读障碍儿童进行亚型分类:与双重缺陷假说的比较
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2007 Jan-Feb;42(1):77-95. doi: 10.1080/13682820600806680.
4
Subtypes of developmental dyslexia in transparent orthographies: a comment on Lachmann and Van Leeuwen (2008).透明正字法中的发展性阅读障碍亚型:对拉赫曼和范·利文(2008)的评论。
Cogn Neuropsychol. 2009 Dec;26(8):752-8. doi: 10.1080/02643290903526289.
5
Auditory processing in developmental dyslexia: an exploratory study of an auditory and visual matching training program with Swedish children with developmental dyslexia.发育性阅读障碍中的听觉处理:一项针对瑞典发育性阅读障碍儿童的听觉与视觉匹配训练项目的探索性研究。
Scand J Psychol. 2009 Jun;50(3):277-85. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9450.2009.00708.x. Epub 2009 Mar 2.
6
Impaired non-speech auditory processing at a pre-reading age is a risk-factor for dyslexia but not a predictor: an ERP study.阅读前非言语听觉处理受损是阅读障碍的一个风险因素,但不是预测因素:一项 ERP 研究。
Cortex. 2013 Apr;49(4):1034-45. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2012.02.013. Epub 2012 Mar 29.
7
The persistence of rapid naming problems in children with reading disabilities: a nine-year follow-up.阅读障碍儿童快速命名问题的持续性:九年随访
J Learn Disabil. 1995 Apr;28(4):232-9. doi: 10.1177/002221949502800405.
8
Do the effects of computer-assisted practice differ for children with reading disabilities with and without IQ-achievement discrepancy?对于存在和不存在智商-成绩差异的阅读障碍儿童,计算机辅助练习的效果是否有所不同?
J Learn Disabil. 2003 Jan-Feb;36(1):34-47. doi: 10.1177/00222194030360010501.
9
Is there a distinct form of developmental dyslexia in children with specific language impairment? Findings from an orthographically regular language.特定语言障碍儿童中是否存在一种独特形式的发育性阅读障碍?来自正字法规则语言的研究结果。
Cogn Behav Neurol. 2008 Dec;21(4):221-6. doi: 10.1097/WNN.0b013e31818a5caf.
10
Subtypes of dyslexia: investigation of Boder's system using quantitative neurophysiology.阅读障碍的亚型:运用定量神经生理学对博德系统进行的研究
Dev Med Child Neurol. 1989 Apr;31(2):215-23. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8749.1989.tb03981.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Training of component reading skills.构件阅读技能训练。
Ann Dyslexia. 1986 Jan;36(1):318-34. doi: 10.1007/BF02648037.
2
Subtyping of reading disorders: Implications for remediation.阅读障碍的亚型分类:对补救的启示。
Ann Dyslexia. 1984 Jan;34(1):205-16. doi: 10.1007/BF02663621.
3
The search for subtypes of specific reading disability: Reflections from a cognitive perspective.特定阅读障碍亚型的探寻:认知视角的反思。
Ann Dyslexia. 1984 Jan;34(1):153-78. doi: 10.1007/BF02663618.
4
Reading disability subtypes in neurologically-impaired students.神经损伤学生的阅读障碍亚型。
Ann Dyslexia. 1987 Jan;37(1):166-88. doi: 10.1007/BF02648065.
5
The effects of manual tracing on memory in normal and retarded readers: some implications for multi-sensory teaching.
Psychol Res. 1981;43(2):179-91. doi: 10.1007/BF00309828.
6
Spatial frequency processing and the prediction of reading ability: a preliminary investigation.空间频率处理与阅读能力预测:一项初步调查。
Percept Psychophys. 1986 Dec;40(6):440-4. doi: 10.3758/bf03208204.
7
A pattern of test findings predicting attention problems at school.一种预测在校注意力问题的测试结果模式。
J Abnorm Child Psychol. 1991 Aug;19(4):451-67. doi: 10.1007/BF00919088.
8
Neuropsychological significance of variations in patterns of academic performance: verbal and visual-spatial abilities.学业成绩模式变化的神经心理学意义:言语和视觉空间能力。
J Abnorm Child Psychol. 1978 Mar;6(1):121-33. doi: 10.1007/BF00915788.