Martino R, Lopez R, Sureda A, Brunet S, Domingo-Albós A
Unitat d'Hematología Clinica, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain.
Haematologica. 1997 May-Jun;82(3):297-304.
Patients with hematologic malignancies and a history of an invasive fungal infection are considered to be at high risk of suffering reactivation of the infection during subsequent intensive chemotherapy.
From January 1993 to September 1996, nine patients with a hematologic malignancy and previous invasive pulmonary aspergillosis (IPA) or Pseudallescheria boydii pneumonia and five with invasive candidiasis received further intensive chemotherapy (n = 3) or a bone marrow or peripheral blood stem cell transplant (n = 11) four days to 13 months (median three months) from the start of therapy for the fungal infection. Five patients with IPA and all five with invasive candidiasis showed complete or good partial radiologic resolution of the infection with the primary antifungal therapy given, which was continued before, during and after the period(s) of subsequent neutropenia.
Twelve of the 14 patients showed no signs of progression or reactivation of the fungal infection during therapy, while two patients with active IPA died with progressive aspergillosis shortly after an allogeneic transplant. A review of the literature revealed that in both types of infections the risk of reactivation and dissemination appears low after achieving clinical and radiologic signs of response, which takes several weeks or months before proceeding to further antileukemic therapy.
Despite lack of definite evidence, administration of an active antifungal drug before, during and after the period of neutropenia appears to be useful. In IPA, residual masses, nodules or cavities in the lung usually contain viable invasive fungal elements and should be resected whenever possible. On the other hand, the risk of reactivation and progression of an active fungal infection during intensive chemoradiotherapy is very high, and novel therapeutic strategies appear warranted in this setting.
血液系统恶性肿瘤患者以及有侵袭性真菌感染病史者,被认为在后续强化化疗期间有感染再激活的高风险。
1993年1月至1996年9月,9例有血液系统恶性肿瘤且既往有侵袭性肺曲霉病(IPA)或波氏假阿利什霉肺炎的患者,以及5例有侵袭性念珠菌病的患者,在真菌感染治疗开始后4天至13个月(中位时间3个月)接受了进一步强化化疗(n = 3)或骨髓或外周血干细胞移植(n = 11)。5例IPA患者和所有5例侵袭性念珠菌病患者在给予初始抗真菌治疗后,感染在放射学上显示完全或良好的部分缓解,在后续中性粒细胞减少期间之前、期间和之后均持续使用该治疗。
14例患者中有12例在治疗期间未显示真菌感染进展或再激活的迹象,而2例活动性IPA患者在异基因移植后不久死于进行性曲霉病。文献回顾显示,在这两种类型的感染中,在达到临床和放射学缓解迹象后,再激活和播散的风险似乎较低,在进行进一步抗白血病治疗前这需要数周或数月时间。
尽管缺乏确凿证据,但在中性粒细胞减少期间之前、期间和之后给予活性抗真菌药物似乎是有用的。在IPA中,肺部残留的肿块、结节或空洞通常含有存活的侵袭性真菌成分,应尽可能切除。另一方面,在强化放化疗期间活动性真菌感染再激活和进展的风险非常高,在这种情况下似乎需要新的治疗策略。