Suppr超能文献

确保临床科学家的生存。

Ensuring the survival of the clinician-scientist.

作者信息

Schrier R W

机构信息

Department of Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Denver 80262, USA.

出版信息

Acad Med. 1997 Jul;72(7):589-94. doi: 10.1097/00001888-199707000-00010.

Abstract

Many forces threaten the survival of the clinician-scientist as an academic species, among them: (1) the changing health environment; (2) the complexity of and rapid advances in biomedical science, which necessitate that MD-PhD graduates "retool" after completing their clinical training; (3) the length and rigor of the research training required to train clinician-scientists adequately; (4) the scarcity of funding for subspecialty training positions; (5) the perception that the successful clinician-scientists in academic medicine are those who focus on basic, rather than clinical, research; (6) the indebtedness of young physicians when they complete medical schools; (7) the fierce competition for research funding; and (8) pessimism among senior faculty about the clinician-scientist's potential for survival. There are solutions to these issues that must be vigorously pursued to ensure the survival of the clinician-scientist: (1) Rigorous six- to seven-year programs (e.g., two in internal medicine, four to five in a subspecialty) for physicians must be established. They should include a minimum of three years of research and should lead to board certification in internal medicine, pediatrics, psychiatry, etc., board certification in a subspecialty, and a PhD in clinical science. (2) These programs must have a choice of three tracks, (a) disease-oriented basic research, (b) clinical investigation in patients, and (c) health services research. Such a program--the PhD in Clinical Science program--has recently been approved and begun at the University of Colorado. (3) Funding organizations such as the National Institutes of Health should designate their training resources primarily for programs with a minimum of three years of formal and rigorous research training. (4) These rigorous research training programs must be integrated with young-faculty awards for clinician-scientists to ensure continuity in their investigative careers. (5) Loan-repayment programs must be developed to repay student loans of clinician-scientists during their first five years as faculty members. (6) Against the background of these changes, senior faculty as mentors must articulate to emerging clinician-scientists the excitement of being involved in future discoveries in biomedical science.

摘要

诸多因素威胁着临床科研人员作为一个学术群体的生存,其中包括:(1)不断变化的健康环境;(2)生物医学科学的复杂性和快速发展,这使得医学博士-哲学博士毕业生在完成临床培训后需要“重新装备”;(3)充分培养临床科研人员所需的研究培训的时长和严格程度;(4)亚专业培训岗位的资金稀缺;(5)认为学术医学领域成功的临床科研人员是专注于基础研究而非临床研究的人的看法;(6)年轻医生在完成医学院学业时身负债务;(7)对研究资金的激烈竞争;以及(8)资深教员对临床科研人员生存潜力的悲观态度。针对这些问题有一些解决方案,必须大力推行以确保临床科研人员的生存:(1)必须为医生建立严格的六到七年项目(例如,两年内科培训,四到五年亚专业培训)。这些项目应包括至少三年的研究,并应获得内科、儿科、精神病学等的委员会认证、亚专业的委员会认证以及临床科学博士学位。(2)这些项目必须有三条路径可供选择,(a)以疾病为导向的基础研究,(b)针对患者的临床研究,以及(c)卫生服务研究。这样一个项目——临床科学博士项目——最近已在科罗拉多大学获批并启动。(3)像美国国立卫生研究院这样的资助机构应将其培训资源主要指定用于具有至少三年正规且严格研究培训的项目。(4)这些严格的研究培训项目必须与针对临床科研人员的青年教员奖励相结合,以确保他们研究职业生涯的连续性。(5)必须制定贷款偿还计划,以偿还临床科研人员在担任教员的头五年的学生贷款。(6)在这些变化的背景下,作为导师的资深教员必须向新兴的临床科研人员阐明参与生物医学科学未来发现的兴奋之情。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验