• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Discriminant validity of the Inventory to Diagnose Depression between patients with major depression and pure anxiety disorders.

作者信息

Uehara T, Sato T, Sakado K, Kameda K

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, Niigata University School of Medicine, Japan.

出版信息

Psychiatry Res. 1997 Jun 16;71(1):57-61. doi: 10.1016/s0165-1781(97)00040-1.

DOI:10.1016/s0165-1781(97)00040-1
PMID:9247982
Abstract

We examined the discriminant validity of the Inventory to Diagnose Depression (IDD), a self-report instrument designed to diagnose major depressive disorder as defined in DSM-III-R. Forty patients with major depression (MD), 20 patients with anxiety disorders, who had not had a lifetime history of depression (ADs), and 40 control subjects completed the IDD. The IDD results were compared in the three contrasting groups (MD vs. AD+control subjects, MD vs. AD, and MD vs. control subjects). The concordance between the IDD and clinical diagnoses, using a structured interview, was significantly high in the three groups (k = 0.81, 0.66, 0.90, respectively). The IDD total score in the MD group was the highest among the three groups and was distinguished from the AD group or control group (P < 0.001, F = 139.9, d.f. = 2,97). However, the IDD occasionally diagnosed subjects with AD as having MD.

摘要

相似文献

1
Discriminant validity of the Inventory to Diagnose Depression between patients with major depression and pure anxiety disorders.
Psychiatry Res. 1997 Jun 16;71(1):57-61. doi: 10.1016/s0165-1781(97)00040-1.
2
Discriminant validity of the inventory to diagnose depression, lifetime version.用于诊断抑郁症的量表(终生版)的区分效度。
Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1996 Apr;93(4):257-60. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1996.tb10644.x.
3
[Prevalence of depressive disorders in children and adolescents attending primary care. A survey with the Aquitaine Sentinelle Network].[初级保健机构中儿童和青少年抑郁症的患病率。阿基坦哨兵网络的一项调查]
Encephale. 2003 Sep-Oct;29(5):391-400.
4
Depressive and anxiety disorders in chronic hepatitis C patients: reliability and validity of the Patient Health Questionnaire.慢性丙型肝炎患者的抑郁和焦虑障碍:患者健康问卷的信度和效度。
J Affect Disord. 2012 May;138(3):343-51. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2012.01.018. Epub 2012 Feb 10.
5
The reliability and validity of the inventory to diagnose depression in alcohol-dependent men and women.用于诊断酒精依赖男性和女性抑郁症的量表的信度和效度。
J Subst Abuse. 2000;11(4):369-78. doi: 10.1016/s0899-3289(00)00033-x.
6
Symptom differences in major depression, dysthymia, panic disorder, and generalized anxiety disorder.重度抑郁症、恶劣心境、惊恐障碍和广泛性焦虑障碍的症状差异。
Am J Psychiatry. 1994 Feb;151(2):205-9. doi: 10.1176/ajp.151.2.205.
7
Distinguishing mixed anxiety/depression from anxiety and depressive groups using the family history method.使用家族史方法区分混合性焦虑/抑郁与焦虑组和抑郁组。
Compr Psychiatry. 1993 Sep-Oct;34(5):285-90. doi: 10.1016/0010-440x(93)90012-s.
8
Depression and anxiety among coronary heart disease patients: can affect dimensions and theory inform diagnostic disorder-based screening?冠心病患者的抑郁和焦虑:是否会影响维度,以及理论能否为基于诊断障碍的筛查提供信息?
J Clin Psychol. 2012 Apr;68(4):448-61. doi: 10.1002/jclp.21828. Epub 2012 Feb 3.
9
The Zurich Study. VI. A continuum from depression to anxiety disorders?苏黎世研究。第六章。从抑郁症到焦虑症的连续体?
Eur Arch Psychiatry Neurol Sci. 1985;235(3):179-86. doi: 10.1007/BF00380990.
10
Phenomenology and severity of major depression and comorbid lifetime anxiety disorders in primary medical care practice.基层医疗实践中重度抑郁症及共病终生焦虑症的现象学与严重程度
Anxiety. 1996;2(5):210-8. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1522-7154(1996)2:5<210::AID-ANXI2>3.0.CO;2-Q.

引用本文的文献

1
Social dominance and multiple dimensions of psychopathology: An experimental test of reactivity to leadership and subordinate roles.社会支配地位与多种心理病理学维度:对领导和从属角色反应性的实验检验。
PLoS One. 2021 Apr 28;16(4):e0250099. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0250099. eCollection 2021.
2
A path model of different forms of impulsivity with externalizing and internalizing psychopathology: Towards greater specificity.具有外化和内化精神病理学的不同形式冲动性的路径模型:迈向更高的特异性。
Br J Clin Psychol. 2017 Sep;56(3):235-252. doi: 10.1111/bjc.12135. Epub 2017 May 11.
3
The prevalence of postpartum depression: the relative significance of three social status indices.
产后抑郁症的患病率:三种社会地位指标的相对重要性。
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2007 Apr;42(4):316-21. doi: 10.1007/s00127-007-0168-1. Epub 2007 Feb 13.