Watkins D, Gerong A
Department of Education, University of Hong Kong.
J Soc Psychol. 1997 Aug;137(4):480-8. doi: 10.1080/00224549709595464.
Responses of 157 Filipino college students to the Twenty Statements Test (TST) were analyzed for content and compared with earlier responses to the TST by U.S. and Hong Kong Chinese college students. Despite the supposedly collectivist nature of the Filipino culture, far fewer Filipino students than U.S. and Hong Kong Chinese students described themselves in terms of social roles. Contrary to theoretical claims, the Filipinos made greater use of the global identity category than did either the U.S. or Hong Kong Chinese students. Evidence also supported the cross-cultural validity of 4 of the Big Five (McCrae & Costa, 1988) personality traits. However, there are questions about the relevance of Openness to Experience to any of these three cultures. Moreover, the finding that the Filipino respondents reported a higher percentage of positive self-descriptions than did either the U.S. or Chinese respondents indicated that such differences cannot be explained in terms of the individualism-collectivism dimension.
对157名菲律宾大学生的《二十陈述测验》(TST)回答进行了内容分析,并与美国和中国香港大学生早期对TST的回答进行了比较。尽管菲律宾文化被认为具有集体主义性质,但与美国和中国香港学生相比,用社会角色来描述自己的菲律宾学生要少得多。与理论主张相反,菲律宾人比美国或中国香港学生更多地使用了整体身份类别。证据还支持了大五人格特质(麦克雷和科斯塔,1988)中4种特质的跨文化效度。然而,关于开放性体验与这三种文化中任何一种文化的相关性存在疑问。此外,菲律宾受访者报告的积极自我描述比例高于美国或中国受访者,这一发现表明,这种差异无法用个人主义—集体主义维度来解释。