Chiou J S
Department of International Trade, National Chengchi University, Mucha, Taipei, Taiwan.
J Soc Psychol. 2001 Oct;141(5):667-78. doi: 10.1080/00224540109600580.
Among college students in the United States, Taiwan, and Argentina, the author examined the strength of 4 cultural patterns (horizontal collectivism, vertical collectivism, horizontal individualism, vertical individualism; H. C. Triandis, 1995). A 3-group confirmatory factor analysis established the measurement equivalence among the 3 samples before the comparison. The Taiwanese and the Argentine samples were more vertically collectivist than the U.S. sample. The U.S. and the Taiwanese samples were more vertically individualistic than the Argentine sample. The U.S. sample was more horizontally individualistic than the Argentine sample, which, in turn, was more horizontally individualistic than the Taiwanese sample.
在对美国、台湾地区和阿根廷的大学生进行研究时,作者考察了四种文化模式(水平集体主义、垂直集体主义、水平个人主义、垂直个人主义;H.C. 特里安德斯,1995年)的强度。在进行比较之前,通过三组验证性因素分析确定了三个样本之间的测量等效性。台湾地区和阿根廷的样本比美国样本更倾向于垂直集体主义。美国和台湾地区的样本比阿根廷样本更倾向于垂直个人主义。美国样本比阿根廷样本更倾向于水平个人主义,而阿根廷样本又比台湾地区样本更倾向于水平个人主义。