McBain C J, Maccaferri G
Laboratory of Cellular and Molecular Neurophysiology, National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health (NICHD-NIH), Bethesda, MD 20892-4495, USA.
Can J Physiol Pharmacol. 1997 May;75(5):488-94.
The hypothesis that excitatory synapses onto hippocampal inhibitory interneurons undergo forms of synaptic plasticity similar to that observed in principal pyramidal neurons has received much attention in the last few years. No general consensus exists, however, concerning the presence (or absence) of long-term potentiation and depression in nonpyramidal neurons. A large source of this disagreement stems from the experimental paridigms chosen to elicit synaptic plasticity in the various studies, since most of the induction protocols used did not permit the separation of plasticity occurring on principal cells from possible direct plasticity on the interneurons themselves. In this commentary we discuss some of the issues surrounding these data and also address some of the technical considerations one must address before the presence or absence of long-term potentiation in interneurons can be answered unequivocally.
过去几年里,兴奋性突触作用于海马体抑制性中间神经元时会经历与在主要锥体神经元中观察到的类似形式的突触可塑性这一假说备受关注。然而,对于非锥体神经元中是否存在长时程增强和抑制,目前尚无普遍共识。这种分歧的一个主要来源是,在各项研究中用于引发突触可塑性的实验范式,因为大多数所使用的诱导方案不允许区分主要细胞上发生的可塑性与中间神经元自身可能存在的直接可塑性。在这篇评论中,我们讨论了围绕这些数据的一些问题,并且还阐述了在能够明确回答中间神经元中是否存在长时程增强之前必须考虑的一些技术因素。