Heim E, Valach L, Schaffner L
Department of Psychiatry, University of Berne, Switzerland.
Psychosom Med. 1997 Jul-Aug;59(4):408-18. doi: 10.1097/00006842-199707000-00011.
This study examined the relationship between coping and psychosocial adaptation in cancer patients over time and across distinct clinical events.
In a prospective longitudinal study 74 patients with breast cancer were observed for 3 to 5 years at 3- to 6-month intervals. A total of 684 interviews were conducted at different observation points. Three rating scales were used to assess coping and adjustment: first, the Bernese Coping Modes, an observer rating scale devised to elicit 26 coping modes aggregated in this paper as the five Basic Coping Strategies of support, self-control, denial, diverting, and negative-emotional; second, an observer rating scale to ascertain psychosocial adaptation; and third, a self-rating scale as a measure of either emotional distress or well-being.
a) When aggregated in illness stages, coping and distress data on the observed clinical time points showed greater variability than time measures alone (analysis of variance (ANOVA) for repeated measures p < .001). b) A significant relationship between the Basic Coping Strategies and psychosocial adaptation was demonstrated using discriminant and correlational analysis. Furthermore, in stage-dependent Pearson r correlations (p < .05 to .001), a clear-cut relationship was found for hospitalization, chemotherapy, and rehabilitation, but not for convalescence and metastasis. c) A positive relationship was demonstrated between psychosocial adaptation and strategies that can be generally categorized as good forms of coping such as support and self-control, and, to a lesser degree, diverting and denial. Conversely, poor coping exerted a negative effect on almost all illness stages and on most criteria of adjustment.
In long-term studies on psychosocial adaptation and coping, stage-related measures should be preferred to time measures alone. The implications of different strategies for the psychological treatment of cancer patients are discussed.
本研究考察了癌症患者应对方式与心理社会适应之间随时间推移以及在不同临床事件中的关系。
在一项前瞻性纵向研究中,对74名乳腺癌患者进行了为期3至5年的观察,观察间隔为3至6个月。在不同观察点共进行了684次访谈。使用了三个评定量表来评估应对方式和适应情况:第一,伯尔尼应对方式量表,这是一个观察者评定量表,旨在引出26种应对方式,本文将其归纳为支持、自我控制、否认、转移和消极情绪这五种基本应对策略;第二,一个观察者评定量表,用于确定心理社会适应情况;第三,一个自评量表,作为情绪困扰或幸福感的度量。
a)当按疾病阶段汇总时,观察到的临床时间点上的应对方式和困扰数据显示出比仅按时间测量更大的变异性(重复测量方差分析(ANOVA),p <.001)。b)使用判别分析和相关分析证明了基本应对策略与心理社会适应之间存在显著关系。此外,在依赖阶段的皮尔逊r相关性分析(p <.05至.001)中,发现住院、化疗和康复阶段存在明确的关系,但恢复期和转移期不存在。c)心理社会适应与通常可归类为良好应对形式的策略(如支持和自我控制,以及在较小程度上的转移和否认)之间存在正相关关系。相反,不良应对方式对几乎所有疾病阶段和大多数适应标准都产生了负面影响。
在关于心理社会适应和应对的长期研究中,应优先采用与阶段相关的测量方法而非仅采用时间测量方法。文中讨论了不同策略对癌症患者心理治疗的意义。