Lee J H, Martin N A, Alsina G, McArthur D L, Zaucha K, Hovda D A, Becker D P
Division of Neurosurgery, and Neuropsychiatric Institute, School of Medicine, University of California at Los Angeles, 90095-7039, USA.
J Neurosurg. 1997 Aug;87(2):221-33. doi: 10.3171/jns.1997.87.2.0221.
The authors prospectively investigated cerebral hemodynamic changes in 152 patients with head injuries to clarify the relationship between cerebral vasospasm and outcome. They also sought to determine the most clinically meaningful criteria for diagnosing cerebral vasospasm. Patients with varying degrees of moderate-to-severe head injury were monitored using transcranial Doppler (TCD) ultrasonography and intravenous 133Xe-cerebral blood flow (CBF) measurements. Outcome was determined at 6 months. Using TCD ultrasonography, mean flow velocities were determined for the middle cerebral artery (V(MCA), 149 patients) and basilar artery (V(BA), 126 patients). Recordings of the mean extracranial internal carotid artery velocity (V(EC-ICA)) were also performed to determine the hemispheric ratio (V(MCA)/V(EC-ICA), 147 patients). Cerebral blood flow measurements were obtained in 91 patients. Concurrent TCD and CBF data from 85 patients were used to calculate a "spasm index" (the V(MCA) or V(BA), respectively, divided by the hemispheric or global CBF). The authors investigated the clinical significance of elevated flow velocity, hemispheric ratio, and spasm index. Patients diagnosed as having MCA or BA vasospasm on the basis of TCD-derived criteria alone had a significantly worse outcome than patients without vasospasm. When CBF was considered, hemodynamically significant vasospasm, as defined by an elevated spasm index, was even more strongly associated with poor outcome. Stepwise logistic regression analysis confirmed that hemodynamically significant vasospasm was a significant predictor of poor outcome, independent of the effects of admission Glasgow Coma Scale score and age. On the basis of the results of this study, the authors suggest that the important factor impacting on outcome is not vasospasm per se, but hemodynamically significant vasospasm with low CBF. These findings show that vasospasm is a pathophysiologically important posttraumatic secondary insult, which is best diagnosed by the combined use of TCD and CBF measurements.
作者对152例头部受伤患者的脑血流动力学变化进行了前瞻性研究,以阐明脑血管痉挛与预后之间的关系。他们还试图确定诊断脑血管痉挛最具临床意义的标准。使用经颅多普勒(TCD)超声和静脉注射133Xe脑血流量(CBF)测量对不同程度的中重度头部受伤患者进行监测。在6个月时确定预后。使用TCD超声,测定大脑中动脉(V(MCA),149例患者)和基底动脉(V(BA),126例患者)的平均流速。还记录了平均颅外颈内动脉流速(V(EC-ICA))以确定半球比率(V(MCA)/V(EC-ICA),147例患者)。对91例患者进行了脑血流量测量。来自85例患者的同步TCD和CBF数据用于计算“痉挛指数”(分别为V(MCA)或V(BA)除以半球或全脑CBF)。作者研究了流速升高、半球比率和痉挛指数的临床意义。仅根据TCD得出的标准被诊断为患有MCA或BA血管痉挛的患者的预后明显比没有血管痉挛的患者差。当考虑CBF时,由升高的痉挛指数定义的血流动力学显著血管痉挛与不良预后的相关性更强。逐步逻辑回归分析证实,血流动力学显著血管痉挛是不良预后的重要预测因素,独立于入院时格拉斯哥昏迷量表评分和年龄的影响。基于这项研究的结果,作者认为影响预后的重要因素不是血管痉挛本身,而是伴有低CBF的血流动力学显著血管痉挛。这些发现表明,血管痉挛是一种病理生理上重要的创伤后继发性损伤,最好通过联合使用TCD和CBF测量来诊断。