• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

治疗反应的自然类别。

Natural classes of treatment response.

作者信息

Morral A R, Iguchi M Y, Belding M A, Lamb R J

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, MCP-Hahnemann School of Medicine, Allegheny University of the Health Sciences, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19102-1192, USA.

出版信息

J Consult Clin Psychol. 1997 Aug;65(4):673-85. doi: 10.1037//0022-006x.65.4.673.

DOI:10.1037//0022-006x.65.4.673
PMID:9256569
Abstract

This study examines an approach to identifying patterns of treatment response over time. Treatment response profiles are identified by cluster analyzing a repeated measure of patient performance collected at intervals during treatment. The procedure is demonstrated in Study 1 using monthly urinalysis results of 103 patients entering methadone maintenance treatment. The internal, external, and face validities of derived treatment response profiles are evaluated. A logistic regression model predicting treatment response is then constructed from intake variables found to correspond with the treatment response profiles. Study 2 replicates the procedures on an independent sample. Treatment response profiles facilitate the analysis of treatment response offering advantages over common measures of treatment outcome, such as performance at follow-up, change in performance from treatment entry to follow-up, or performance summed across treatment.

摘要

本研究探讨了一种识别随时间变化的治疗反应模式的方法。通过对治疗期间定期收集的患者表现的重复测量进行聚类分析来确定治疗反应概况。在研究1中,使用103名进入美沙酮维持治疗患者的月度尿液分析结果演示了该程序。评估了所推导的治疗反应概况的内部、外部和表面效度。然后根据发现与治疗反应概况相对应的入院变量构建预测治疗反应的逻辑回归模型。研究2在独立样本上重复了这些程序。治疗反应概况有助于对治疗反应进行分析,与常见的治疗结果测量方法相比具有优势,如随访时的表现、从治疗开始到随访时表现的变化或整个治疗期间的表现总和。

相似文献

1
Natural classes of treatment response.治疗反应的自然类别。
J Consult Clin Psychol. 1997 Aug;65(4):673-85. doi: 10.1037//0022-006x.65.4.673.
2
Effects of urine testing frequency on outcome in a methadone take-home contingency program.尿液检测频率对美沙酮带回家应急计划结果的影响。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2001 Mar 1;62(1):69-76. doi: 10.1016/s0376-8716(00)00160-5.
3
Treatment failure and methadone dose in a public methadone maintenance treatment programme in Geneva.日内瓦公共美沙酮维持治疗项目中的治疗失败与美沙酮剂量
Drug Alcohol Depend. 1998 May 1;50(3):233-9. doi: 10.1016/s0376-8716(98)00035-0.
4
[Urine testing in the treatment of opiate addiction].[尿液检测在阿片类药物成瘾治疗中的应用]
Ugeskr Laeger. 2003 Mar 24;165(13):1346-8.
5
Identifying methadone maintenance clients at risk for poor treatment response: pretreatment and early progress indicators.
Drug Alcohol Depend. 1999 Jun 1;55(1-2):25-33. doi: 10.1016/s0376-8716(98)00176-8.
6
Does methadone maintenance treatment based on the new national guidelines work in a primary care setting?基于新的国家指南的美沙酮维持治疗在初级保健环境中是否有效?
Br J Gen Pract. 2003 Jun;53(491):461-7.
7
Heavy drinking, alcohol-dependent vs. nondependent methadone-maintenance clients: a follow-up study.
Addict Behav. 1997 Jan-Feb;22(1):69-80. doi: 10.1016/s0306-4603(96)00005-6.
8
The impact of ongoing illicit drug use on methadone adherence in illicit drug users receiving treatment for HIV in a directly observed therapy program.在直接观察治疗项目中,持续使用非法药物对接受HIV治疗的非法药物使用者美沙酮依从性的影响。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2007 Jul 10;89(2-3):306-9. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2007.02.007. Epub 2007 Mar 23.
9
Preliminary evidence of good treatment response in antisocial drug abusers.
Drug Alcohol Depend. 1998 Feb 1;49(3):249-60. doi: 10.1016/s0376-8716(98)00018-0.
10
Cocaine abuse sharply reduced in an effective methadone maintenance program.在一个有效的美沙酮维持治疗项目中,可卡因滥用现象大幅减少。
J Addict Dis. 1999;18(4):63-75. doi: 10.1300/J069v18n04_06.

引用本文的文献

1
Transitions in Suicide Risk from Early Adolescence to Early Adulthood.从青春期早期到成年早期自杀风险的转变
Arch Suicide Res. 2024 Sep 27:1-17. doi: 10.1080/13811118.2024.2403491.
2
Trajectories of Treatment Response and Nonresponse in Youth at High Risk for Suicide.自杀高风险青少年的治疗反应和无反应轨迹。
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2022 Sep;61(9):1119-1130. doi: 10.1016/j.jaac.2022.01.010. Epub 2022 Feb 2.
3
Survey of Treatment Preferences for Opioid Use Disorder.阿片类物质使用障碍治疗偏好调查
Jacobs J Addict Ther. 2018;5(3). Epub 2018 Nov 27.
4
Symptom trajectories in patients with panic disorder in a primary care intervention: Results from a randomized controlled trial (PARADISE).在初级保健干预中惊恐障碍患者的症状轨迹:一项随机对照试验(PARADISE)的结果。
Sci Rep. 2019 May 9;9(1):7170. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-43487-x.
5
Contingent Vs. Non-Contingent Rewards: Time-Based Intervention Response Patterns Among Stimulant-Using Men Who Have Sex With Men.或有奖励与非或有奖励:与男性发生性关系的使用兴奋剂男性的基于时间的干预反应模式
J Subst Abuse Treat. 2017 Jan;72:19-24. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2016.09.004. Epub 2016 Sep 13.
6
Measuring Outcome in the Treatment of Cocaine Dependence.衡量可卡因依赖治疗的效果
J Alcohol Drug Depend. 2013 Mar;1(2). doi: 10.4172/2329-6488.1000108.
7
Toward empirical identification of a clinically meaningful indicator of treatment outcome: features of candidate indicators and evaluation of sensitivity to treatment effects and relationship to one year follow up cocaine use outcomes.迈向治疗结果临床意义指标的实证识别:候选指标的特征、对治疗效果的敏感性评估以及与一年随访可卡因使用结果的关系。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2014 Apr 1;137:3-19. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2014.01.012. Epub 2014 Jan 31.
8
Patterns of early change and their relationship to outcome and early treatment termination in patients with panic disorder.惊恐障碍患者的早期变化模式及其与结局和早期治疗终止的关系。
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2014 Apr;82(2):287-97. doi: 10.1037/a0035535. Epub 2014 Jan 20.
9
The first 7 days of a quit attempt predicts relapse: validation of a measure for screening medications for nicotine dependence.戒烟尝试的头 7 天可预测复吸:用于筛选尼古丁依赖治疗药物的一种测量方法的验证。
J Addict Med. 2013 Jul-Aug;7(4):249-54. doi: 10.1097/ADM.0b013e31829363e1.
10
Cluster analysis of undergraduate drinkers based on alcohol expectancy scores.基于酒精期望得分的本科生饮酒者聚类分析。
J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2012 Mar;73(2):238-49. doi: 10.15288/jsad.2012.73.238.