Ormel J, Lindenberg S, Steverink N, Vonkorff M
Department of Health Sciences, University of Groningen, The Netherlands.
Soc Sci Med. 1997 Oct;45(7):1051-63. doi: 10.1016/s0277-9536(97)00032-4.
Quality of life (QofL) has emerged as a new outcome paradigm. It is now the endpoint in various taxonomies of patient outcomes, in which relationships are modeled amongst biological abnormalities, symptom status, functional status, disability, health perceptions and quality of life. Although current models and taxonomies point at important determinants of QofL, they do not provide a heuristic that guides the conceptualization of QofL and the systematic development of an explanatory theory of how ill health affects QofL. General mechanisms linking ill health, behavior, and QofL are lacking. In this paper we propose social production function (SPF) theory as providing such a heuristic, relating the effects of ill health, the activities that patients engage in to maintain QofL, and QofL itself. This theory basically asserts that people produce their own well-being by trying to optimize achievement of universal human goals via six instrumental goals within the environmental and functional limitations they are facing. Three important notions of SPF theory are: (1) the linkages between goals, needs, and well-being; (2) the distinction between universal needs and instrumental goals; and (3) substitution among instrumental goals, activities and endowments according to cost-benefit considerations, whereby costs refer to scarce resources such as functional capacity, time, effort and money. We will argue that SPF theory meaningfully relates the "biomedical model"-with its focus on pathological processes and biological, physiological and clinical outcomes-to the "quality of life" model, with its focus on functioning and well-being. We describe SPF theory and how SPF theory can be used to: (1) operationally define and measure QofL; (2) clarify persistent measurement problems; and (3) develop an explanatory framework of the effects of disease on QofL. In the discussion section, we address the limitations of the SPF approach of QofL and its relationship with personality.
生活质量(QofL)已成为一种新的结果范式。它现在是患者结果各种分类中的终点,在这些分类中,生物异常、症状状态、功能状态、残疾、健康认知和生活质量之间的关系被建模。尽管当前的模型和分类指出了生活质量的重要决定因素,但它们没有提供一种启发式方法来指导生活质量的概念化以及关于健康不佳如何影响生活质量的解释性理论的系统发展。缺乏将健康不佳、行为和生活质量联系起来的一般机制。在本文中,我们提出社会生产函数(SPF)理论作为提供这样一种启发式方法,将健康不佳的影响、患者为维持生活质量而参与的活动以及生活质量本身联系起来。该理论基本上断言,人们通过在他们所面临的环境和功能限制内,试图通过六个工具性目标来优化普遍人类目标的实现,从而产生自己的幸福。社会生产函数理论的三个重要概念是:(1)目标、需求和幸福之间的联系;(2)普遍需求和工具性目标之间的区别;(3)根据成本效益考虑在工具性目标、活动和禀赋之间进行替代,其中成本指的是诸如功能能力、时间、精力和金钱等稀缺资源。我们将论证,社会生产函数理论有意义地将专注于病理过程和生物、生理及临床结果的“生物医学模型”与专注于功能和幸福的“生活质量模型”联系起来。我们描述社会生产函数理论以及如何使用社会生产函数理论来:(1)操作性地定义和测量生活质量;(2)澄清持续存在的测量问题;(3)建立疾病对生活质量影响的解释框架。在讨论部分,我们阐述了生活质量的社会生产函数方法的局限性及其与个性的关系。