Suppr超能文献

肺动脉导管与围手术期结局

Pulmonary artery catheters and outcome in the perioperative period.

作者信息

Leibowitz A B, Beilin Y

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, The Mount Sinai Medical Center, New York, NY 10029-6574, USA.

出版信息

New Horiz. 1997 Aug;5(3):214-21.

PMID:9259333
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To review the literature addressing use of the pulmonary artery catheter (PAC) in the perioperative patient.

DATA SOURCE

All pertinent English language articles dealing with the use of pulmonary artery catheterization in perioperative patients were retrieved from 1977 through 1996.

STUDY SELECTION

Articles were chosen if the perioperative use of pulmonary artery catheterization was studied or reviewed.

DATA EXTRACTION

From the articles selected, information was obtained about changes in therapy and changes in outcome associated with PAC use in patients undergoing cardiac surgery, aortic surgery, peripheral vascular surgery, and neurosurgery. Information was also extracted about perioperative PAC use in geriatric patients and in patients with preeclampsia.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Low-risk patients undergoing cardiac surgery do not appear to benefit from PAC use. Studies looking at high-risk patients undergoing cardiac surgery are lacking, making accurate determination of patient benefit difficult. The PAC may be useful in the management of some patients undergoing aortic surgery, though recent studies have identified populations of patients that can be safely monitored by less invasive means. Use of the PAC may lead to fewer complications in high-risk patients undergoing peripheral vascular surgery. Until data are forthcoming, it is not possible to accurately assess the overall impact of PAC use on complications and mortality in patients undergoing neurosurgical procedures. However, use of the PAC to monitor and treat air embolism in this group of patients does not appear to be appropriate. Routine perioperative use of the PAC does not appear to be appropriate because of age alone. Available scientific data do not support use of the PAC in patients with uncomplicated preeclampsia; however, some experts feel that PAC use may be helpful in the management of selected patients with severe preeclampsia.

CONCLUSION

There are no Grade A indications for PAC use in the perioperative period. Current available literature suffers from a lack of randomized controlled clinical trials. Multicentered randomized controlled trials are needed.

摘要

目的

回顾关于围手术期患者使用肺动脉导管(PAC)的文献。

数据来源

检索了1977年至1996年所有涉及围手术期患者使用肺动脉导管插入术的相关英文文章。

研究选择

若文章对围手术期肺动脉导管插入术的使用进行了研究或综述,则予以选取。

数据提取

从所选文章中,获取了与接受心脏手术、主动脉手术、外周血管手术和神经外科手术患者使用PAC相关的治疗变化和结局变化信息。还提取了老年患者和先兆子痫患者围手术期使用PAC的信息。

数据综合

接受心脏手术的低风险患者似乎无法从使用PAC中获益。缺乏针对接受心脏手术的高风险患者的研究,使得准确确定患者获益情况变得困难。PAC可能对某些接受主动脉手术的患者的管理有用,不过近期研究已确定了一些可通过侵入性较小的手段进行安全监测的患者群体。对于接受外周血管手术的高风险患者,使用PAC可能会减少并发症。在有更多数据之前,无法准确评估使用PAC对接受神经外科手术患者的并发症和死亡率的总体影响。然而,在这类患者中使用PAC来监测和治疗空气栓塞似乎并不合适。仅因年龄因素,PAC的常规围手术期使用似乎并不合适。现有科学数据不支持在无并发症的先兆子痫患者中使用PAC;然而,一些专家认为在某些重度先兆子痫患者的管理中使用PAC可能会有帮助。

结论

围手术期使用PAC没有A级适应证。当前可用文献缺乏随机对照临床试验。需要进行多中心随机对照试验。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验