Papadakos P J, Vender J S
Department of Anesthesiology, University of Rochester, NY, USA.
New Horiz. 1997 Aug;5(3):287-91.
To review the literature addressing the issue of training requirements for pulmonary artery catheter (PAC) utilization in adult patients.
All pertinent English language articles dealing with training requirements for pulmonary artery catheterization were retrieved from 1984 through 1997.
Articles were chosen if issues related to training and pulmonary artery catheterization were studied or reviewed.
From the articles selected, information about PAC training was obtained.
The PAC is a commonly employed monitoring tool in the management of critically ill patients. Recent publications have strongly implied that PAC monitoring is associated with an increased morbidity and no notable clinical benefit. In response to these findings, the value of PAC monitoring has been questioned. The benefit assessment of any technology on clinical outcome presumes that the care provider possesses the skills and knowledge to optimally utilize the data obtained and simultaneously minimize the potential complications. Several recent articles have addressed physician and nurse knowledge as it pertains to PAC monitoring. The results of these studies are quite alarming. Marked deficiencies of knowledge were noted particularly in area of data interpretation and patient management. Extrapolating from their conclusions, it appears that any effort to proactively assess the value of PAC monitoring will be compromised until attempts are made to standardize and optimize the clinical skills of those involved in utilization of the technology. This article provides a proposed program for clinical education and raises the question regarding the necessity of demonstrated proficiency.
Training, credentialing, and continued quality improvement related to PAC should be improved.
回顾关于成人患者肺动脉导管(PAC)使用培训要求问题的文献。
检索1984年至1997年所有涉及肺动脉导管插入术培训要求的相关英文文章。
选择研究或综述了与培训及肺动脉导管插入术相关问题的文章。
从所选文章中获取有关PAC培训的信息。
PAC是危重症患者管理中常用的监测工具。近期出版物强烈暗示PAC监测与发病率增加相关且无显著临床益处。针对这些发现,PAC监测的价值受到质疑。任何技术对临床结局的益处评估都假定护理人员具备最佳利用所获数据并同时将潜在并发症降至最低的技能和知识。近期几篇文章探讨了医生和护士与PAC监测相关的知识。这些研究结果相当令人担忧。尤其在数据解读和患者管理方面发现了明显的知识缺陷。从他们的结论推断,在尝试对使用该技术的人员的临床技能进行标准化和优化之前,任何主动评估PAC监测价值的努力都将受到影响。本文提供了一个临床教育的提议方案,并提出了关于证明熟练程度必要性的问题。
应改进与PAC相关的培训、资质认证和持续质量改进。