Datta P, Dasgupta A
Chiron Diagnostics Corporation, Walpole Massachusetts, USA.
Ther Drug Monit. 1997 Aug;19(4):465-9. doi: 10.1097/00007691-199708000-00017.
Toxicity from ingestion of the oleander plant is common. Oleandrin, the oleander glycoside, has structural similarity to cardiac glycoside digoxin and is known to cross react with various digoxin immunoassays. The authors studied the cross reactivity of oleandrin and its deglycosylated congener oleandrigenin with a fluorescence polarization immunoassay for digitoxin and compared their results with a new chemiluminescent assay for digitoxin on the Automated Chemiluminescent System (ACS:180 Plus) from Chiron Diagnostics. Even though the chemiluminescent assay has been reported to be comparable with the fluorescence polarization assay among normal patient population, oleandrin and oleandrigenin showed very high cross reactivities with the fluorescence polarization immunoassay and minimal cross reactivity with the new chemiluminescent assay. When the authors supplemented a serum specimen containing no digitoxin with 50 micrograms/ml of oleandrin, the fluorescence polarization assay recorded a value of 535.7 ng/ml of digitoxin equivalent, whereas the new chemiluminescent assay recorded a value of 10.3 ng/ml of digitoxin equivalent. The cross reactivity of oleandrigenin with the fluorescence polarization immunoassay for digitoxin was significantly lower than oleandrin. The presence of oleandrin also falsely elevated total digitoxin level in a specimen supplemented with digitoxin and oleandrin. The authors also measured free digitoxin concentration by the fluorescence polarization immunoassay in the ultrafiltrate of serum supplemented with digitoxin and oleandrin. Because digitoxin and oleandrin are bound strongly to protein, monitoring free digitoxin concentration by the fluorescence polarization immunoassay instead of total digitoxin concentration does not eliminate oleandrin interference. The authors conclude that fluorescence polarization immunoassay for digitoxin has a high cross reactivity with oleandrin and can falsely elevate digitoxin concentration in the presence of oleandrin, whereas the new chemiluminescent assay for digitoxin is almost free from interferences from oleandrin.
摄入夹竹桃属植物导致中毒的情况很常见。夹竹桃苷(oleandrin)与强心苷地高辛在结构上相似,并且已知会与各种地高辛免疫测定发生交叉反应。作者使用一种针对洋地黄毒苷的荧光偏振免疫测定法,研究了夹竹桃苷及其去糖基化同系物夹竹桃次苷元(oleandrigenin)的交叉反应性,并将他们的结果与Chiron Diagnostics公司的自动化学发光系统(ACS:180 Plus)上一种新的洋地黄毒苷化学发光测定法进行了比较。尽管据报道在正常患者群体中化学发光测定法与荧光偏振测定法相当,但夹竹桃苷和夹竹桃次苷元在荧光偏振免疫测定中显示出非常高的交叉反应性,而在新的化学发光测定中交叉反应性极小。当作者向不含地高辛的血清样本中添加50微克/毫升的夹竹桃苷时,荧光偏振测定法记录的地高辛当量值为535.7纳克/毫升,而新的化学发光测定法记录的地高辛当量值为10.3纳克/毫升。夹竹桃次苷元与洋地黄毒苷荧光偏振免疫测定的交叉反应性明显低于夹竹桃苷。夹竹桃苷的存在还会错误地提高添加了地高辛和夹竹桃苷的样本中的总地高辛水平。作者还通过荧光偏振免疫测定法测量了添加了地高辛和夹竹桃苷的血清超滤液中的游离地高辛浓度。由于地高辛和夹竹桃苷与蛋白质结合紧密,通过荧光偏振免疫测定法监测游离地高辛浓度而非总地高辛浓度并不能消除夹竹桃苷的干扰。作者得出结论,洋地黄毒苷的荧光偏振免疫测定法与夹竹桃苷具有高交叉反应性,并且在存在夹竹桃苷的情况下会错误地提高地高辛浓度,而新的洋地黄毒苷化学发光测定法几乎不受夹竹桃苷的干扰。