Kaul S, Senior R, Dittrich H, Raval U, Khattar R, Lahiri A
Cardiovascular Division, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville 22908, USA.
Circulation. 1997 Aug 5;96(3):785-92.
The purpose of this study was to determine whether myocardial contrast echocardiography (MCE) can be used to detect coronary artery disease (CAD) during rest and pharmacological stress in humans through the use of venous injections of contrast.
Thirty patients with known or suspected CAD underwent MCE and 99mTc-sestamibi single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) at baseline and after dipyridamole (0.56 mg x kg(-1)) infusion. Ten myocardial segments (5 each in the apical two- and four-chamber views) from the two sets of images using both methods were scored for myocardial perfusion as follows: 1=normal, 0.5=mildly reduced, and 0=severely reduced. The information from baseline and postdipyridamole images was then used to determine whether an abnormal segment was irreversible (similar abnormal perfusion at baseline and after dipyridamole) or reversible (perfusion better at baseline compared with after dipyridamole). Concordance between segmental scores was 92% (kappa=.99) for both methods. Concordance between normal perfusion and reversible or irreversible segmental defects was 90% (kappa=.80). Agreem between the two methods for each of the three vascular territories in each patient was 90% (kappa=.77), while agreement for the presence or absence of CAD in each patient was 86% (kappa=.86). In the 4 patients with disagreement, the perfusion scores were 0.5 for SPECT and 1.0 for MCE.
This study shows that MCE, with venous injection of contrast, can define the presence of CAD during rest and pharmacological stress. The location of perfusion abnormalities and their physiologic relevance (reversible or irreversible) by MCE is similar to that provided by SPECT. MCE, therefore, holds promise for the noninvasive assessment of myocardial perfusion in humans.
本研究的目的是确定心肌对比超声心动图(MCE)是否可用于通过静脉注射造影剂来检测人类静息和药物负荷状态下的冠状动脉疾病(CAD)。
30例已知或疑似CAD的患者在基线时以及静脉输注双嘧达莫(0.56 mg·kg⁻¹)后接受了MCE和99mTc- sestamibi单光子发射计算机断层扫描(SPECT)。使用这两种方法从两组图像中选取10个心肌节段(心尖两腔和四腔视图各5个),并对心肌灌注进行评分如下:1 =正常,0.5 =轻度减低,0 =重度减低。然后利用基线和双嘧达莫注射后图像的信息来确定异常节段是不可逆的(基线和双嘧达莫注射后灌注异常相似)还是可逆的(与双嘧达莫注射后相比,基线时灌注更好)。两种方法的节段评分一致性为92%(kappa = 0.99)。正常灌注与可逆或不可逆节段性缺损之间的一致性为90%(kappa = 0.80)。每位患者三个血管区域中两种方法的一致性为90%(kappa = 0.77),而每位患者CAD存在与否的一致性为86%(kappa = 0.86)。在4例存在分歧的患者中,SPECT的灌注评分为0.5,MCE的灌注评分为1.0。
本研究表明,静脉注射造影剂的MCE能够在静息和药物负荷状态下明确CAD的存在。MCE所显示的灌注异常的位置及其生理相关性(可逆或不可逆)与SPECT相似。因此,MCE在人类心肌灌注的无创评估方面具有前景。