• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

我们能从希伯来语的形态学中学到什么?一项关于形态表征的掩蔽启动研究。

What can we learn from the morphology of Hebrew? A masked-priming investigation of morphological representation.

作者信息

Frost R, Forster K I, Deutsch A

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Hebrew University, Jerusalem, Israel.

出版信息

J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1997 Jul;23(4):829-56. doi: 10.1037//0278-7393.23.4.829.

DOI:10.1037//0278-7393.23.4.829
PMID:9265076
Abstract

All Hebrew words are composed of 2 interwoven morphemes: a triconsonantal root and a phonological word pattern. the lexical representations of these morphemic units were examined using masked priming. When primes and targets shared an identical word pattern, neither lexical decision nor naming of targets was facilitated. In contrast root primes facilitated both lexical decisions and naming of target words that were derived from these roots. This priming effect proved to be independent of meaning similarity because no priming effects were found when primes and targets were semantically but not morphologically related. These results suggest that Hebrew roots are lexical units whereas word patterns are not. A working model of lexical organization in Hebrew is offered on the basis of these results.

摘要

所有希伯来语单词都由两个相互交织的语素组成

一个三辅音词根和一个音系词模式。使用掩蔽启动来研究这些语素单位的词汇表征。当启动词和目标词共享相同的词模式时,目标词的词汇判断和命名都没有得到促进。相比之下,词根启动促进了源自这些词根的目标词的词汇判断和命名。这种启动效应被证明与意义相似性无关,因为当启动词和目标词在语义上相关但在形态上不相关时,没有发现启动效应。这些结果表明,希伯来语词根是词汇单位,而词模式不是。基于这些结果,提出了一个希伯来语词汇组织的工作模型。

相似文献

1
What can we learn from the morphology of Hebrew? A masked-priming investigation of morphological representation.我们能从希伯来语的形态学中学到什么?一项关于形态表征的掩蔽启动研究。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1997 Jul;23(4):829-56. doi: 10.1037//0278-7393.23.4.829.
2
Do visible semantic primes preactivate lexical representations?可见语义启动词是否预先激活词汇表征?
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2020 Aug;46(8):1533-1569. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000825. Epub 2020 Mar 5.
3
Masked repetition and phonological priming within and across modalities.模态内和模态间的隐蔽重复与语音启动
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2003 Nov;29(6):1256-69. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.29.6.1256.
4
Early morphological effects in reading: evidence from parafoveal preview benefit in Hebrew.阅读中的早期形态学效应:来自希伯来语副中央凹预视效益的证据。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2003 Jun;10(2):415-22. doi: 10.3758/bf03196500.
5
Orthographic structure versus morphological structure: principles of lexical organization in a given language.正字法结构与形态结构:特定语言中词汇组织的原则
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2005 Nov;31(6):1293-326. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.31.6.1293.
6
Verbs and nouns are organized and accessed differently in the mental lexicon: evidence from Hebrew.动词和名词在心理词库中的组织和获取方式不同:来自希伯来语的证据。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1998 Sep;24(5):1238-55. doi: 10.1037//0278-7393.24.5.1238.
7
Morphological priming: dissociation of phonological, semantic, and morphological factors.形态启动:语音、语义和形态因素的分离
Mem Cognit. 2000 Dec;28(8):1277-88. doi: 10.3758/bf03211828.
8
The impact of semantic transparency of morphologically complex words on picture naming.形态复杂单词的语义透明度对图片命名的影响。
Brain Lang. 2004 Jul-Sep;90(1-3):203-12. doi: 10.1016/S0093-934X(03)00433-4.
9
Masked priming by misspellings: Word frequency moderates the effects of SOA and prime-target similarity.拼写错误引发的掩蔽启动效应:词频调节刺激呈现间隔(SOA)和启动项-目标项相似性的影响。
Mem Cognit. 2016 Feb;44(2):262-77. doi: 10.3758/s13421-015-0551-1.
10
Semantic interpretability does not influence masked priming effects.语义可解释性并不影响掩蔽启动效应。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2020 Jun;73(6):856-867. doi: 10.1177/1747021819896766. Epub 2020 Jan 11.

引用本文的文献

1
Gulf Arabic Noun and Verb Retrieval: What Matters?海湾阿拉伯语名词和动词检索:关键何在?
J Psycholinguist Res. 2025 May 26;54(3):40. doi: 10.1007/s10936-025-10148-2.
2
Open-bigrams as orthographic processing units in Arabic: Evidence from the flanking-letters lexical-decision task.阿拉伯语中作为正字法处理单元的开放双字母组:来自侧翼字母词汇判断任务的证据。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2025 May;87(4):1307-1318. doi: 10.3758/s13414-025-03061-2. Epub 2025 Apr 4.
3
SUBTLEX-AR: Arabic word distributional characteristics based on movie subtitles.
SUBTLEX-AR:基于电影字幕的阿拉伯语词汇分布特征
Behav Res Methods. 2025 Feb 26;57(4):104. doi: 10.3758/s13428-024-02560-8.
4
Are the early stages of orthographic processing universal? Insights from masked priming with Semitic words.正字法加工的早期阶段具有普遍性吗?来自闪米特语单词掩蔽启动效应的见解。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2025 Apr;32(2):770-778. doi: 10.3758/s13423-024-02563-8. Epub 2024 Sep 20.
5
Neural Mechanisms of Learning and Consolidation of Morphologically Derived Words in a Novel Language: Evidence From Hebrew Speakers.新语言中形态衍生词学习与巩固的神经机制:来自希伯来语使用者的证据
Neurobiol Lang (Camb). 2024 Sep 11;5(4):864-900. doi: 10.1162/nol_a_00150. eCollection 2024.
6
HeLP: The Hebrew Lexicon project.希伯来语词典项目(HeLP)。
Behav Res Methods. 2024 Dec;56(8):8761-8783. doi: 10.3758/s13428-024-02502-4. Epub 2024 Sep 9.
7
Constraining current neuroanatomical models of reading: the view from Arabic.限制当前阅读的神经解剖模型:来自阿拉伯语的视角。
Brain Struct Funct. 2024 Dec;229(9):2167-2185. doi: 10.1007/s00429-024-02827-y. Epub 2024 Jul 6.
8
Reduced benefit from long-term item frequency contributes to short-term memory deficits in dyslexia.阅读障碍患者长期项目频率减少导致短期记忆缺陷。
Mem Cognit. 2024 Nov;52(8):1928-1940. doi: 10.3758/s13421-024-01601-z. Epub 2024 Jul 2.
9
The Role of Morphological Decomposition in Reading Complex Words in Arabic in Elementary School Years.形态分解在小学阶段阿拉伯语阅读复杂单词中的作用。
J Psycholinguist Res. 2023 Dec;52(6):2863-2876. doi: 10.1007/s10936-023-10024-x. Epub 2023 Nov 3.
10
The role of category ambiguity in normal and impaired lexical processing: can you without the ?类别歧义在正常和受损词汇加工中的作用:没有“?”你能……吗? (此句英文表述似乎不完整,翻译可能会受影响,这是尽力按字面意思翻译的结果)
Front Hum Neurosci. 2023 May 4;17:1028378. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2023.1028378. eCollection 2023.