Elder O C, Nick T G
J Allied Health. 1997 Spring;26(2):51-6.
An adaptation of the Delphi method was used in four parallel studies to survey chairs of baccalaureate programs in clinical laboratory sciences, health information management, occupational therapy, and physical therapy in schools of the allied health professions which held membership in the Association of Schools of the Allied Health Professions. The purpose was to assist the chairs in coming to consensus regarding requisite knowledge and skills of graduates beyond those required for professional accreditation and credentialing, and prerequisite or cognate courses that may be utilized to develop them. Three rounds of questionnaires were administered to each group. The final round was completed by 45 chairs in clinical laboratory sciences (83% of the population); 18 in health information management (86%); 18 in occupational therapy (56%); and 24 in physical therapy (67%). Statistical analysis of third round responses via one-sample, one-sided Z tests indicated consensus among the chairs in the four disciplines on 16 items of knowledge and skills as most important for graduates. Similar consensus was not evident, however, regarding courses to develop the knowledge and skills, with only two courses considered most important by all four groups of chairs.
在四项平行研究中采用了德尔菲法的一种变体,以调查联合健康专业院校中临床检验科学、健康信息管理、职业治疗和物理治疗专业本科项目的负责人,这些院校均为联合健康专业院校协会的成员。目的是协助负责人就毕业生所需的知识和技能达成共识,这些知识和技能超出了专业认证和资格所需的范围,以及可用于培养这些知识和技能的先修课程或相关课程。对每个组进行三轮问卷调查。临床检验科学专业的45位负责人(占总人数的83%)、健康信息管理专业的18位负责人(占86%)、职业治疗专业的18位负责人(占56%)以及物理治疗专业的24位负责人(占67%)完成了最后一轮调查。通过单样本单侧Z检验对第三轮回复进行统计分析,结果表明四个学科的负责人就16项对毕业生最重要的知识和技能达成了共识。然而,在培养这些知识和技能的课程方面,并未出现类似的共识,所有四组负责人都认为只有两门课程最为重要。