Suppr超能文献

一项关于分娩中心护理与标准产妇护理的随机对照研究:对女性健康的影响。

A randomized controlled study of birth center care versus standard maternity care: effects on women's health.

作者信息

Waldenström U, Nilsson C A

机构信息

Graduate Clinical School of Midwifery and Women's Health, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

出版信息

Birth. 1997 Mar;24(1):17-26. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-536x.1997.tb00332.x.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The safety of birth center care for low-risk women is an important issue, but it has not yet been studied in randomized controlled trials. Our purpose was to evaluate the effect of birth center care on women's health during pregnancy, birth, and 2 months postpartum by comparing the outcomes with those of women experiencing standard maternity care in the greater Stockholm area.

METHODS

Of 1860 women, 928 were randomly allocated to birth center care and 932 to standard antenatal, intrapartum, and postpartum care. Information about medical procedures and health outcomes was collected from clinical records, and a questionnaire was mailed to women 2 months after the birth. Analysis was by "intention to treat;" that is, all antenatal, intrapartum, and postpartum transfers were included in the birth center group.

RESULTS

During pregnancy, birth center women made fewer visits to midwives and doctors, experienced fewer tests, and reported fewer health problems. No statistical difference occurred in hospital admissions (4.8%) compared with the control group (4.7%). During labor, birth center women used more alternative birth positions, had longer labors, and did not differ in perineal lacerations. In both groups 1.7 percent of women developed complications, requiring more than 7 days of hospital care after the birth. During the first 2 postpartum months, about 20 percent of women in both groups saw a doctor for similar types of health problems, and no statistical difference occurred in hospital readmissions, 1.4 and 0.8 percent in the birth center and control groups, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The results suggest that birth center care is effective in identifying significant maternal complications and as safe for women as standard maternity care.

摘要

背景

低风险女性在生育中心接受护理的安全性是一个重要问题,但尚未在随机对照试验中进行研究。我们的目的是通过比较斯德哥尔摩大区接受生育中心护理的女性与接受标准产科护理的女性的结局,评估生育中心护理对女性孕期、分娩期及产后2个月健康状况的影响。

方法

在1860名女性中,928名被随机分配至生育中心护理组,932名被分配至接受标准产前、产时及产后护理组。从临床记录中收集有关医疗程序和健康结局的信息,并在分娩后2个月向女性邮寄问卷。分析采用“意向性治疗”原则,即生育中心组纳入所有产前、产时及产后转诊的女性。

结果

孕期,生育中心组的女性看助产士和医生的次数更少,接受的检查更少,报告的健康问题也更少。与对照组(4.7%)相比,住院率(4.8%)无统计学差异。分娩时,生育中心组的女性采用更多替代分娩姿势,产程更长,会阴裂伤情况无差异。两组中均有1.7%的女性出现并发症,产后需要住院治疗超过7天。产后前2个月,两组中约20%的女性因类似健康问题就医,再住院率无统计学差异,生育中心组和对照组分别为1.4%和0.8%。

结论

结果表明,生育中心护理在识别严重孕产妇并发症方面有效,对女性而言与标准产科护理一样安全。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验