Beunen G, Ostyn M, Simons J, Renson R, Claessens A L, Vanden Eynde B, Lefevre J, Vanreusel B, Malina R M, van't Hof M A
Center for Physical Development Research, Faculty of Physical Education and Physiotherapy, K.U.Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Int J Sports Med. 1997 Jul;18 Suppl 3:S171-8. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-972710.
In the Leuven Growth Study of Belgian Boys the growth and physical performance of Belgian boys followed longitudinally between 12 and 19 years were studied. Subsequently, a subsample (n = 240) of Flemish-speaking males were reexamined at 30 and 35 years. A first question relates to the individual growth patterns in a variety of physical fitness characteristics. The three strength tests (static, functional, explosive) show curves that are qualitatively similar to those for height and weight. Their adolescent spurts occur after the height spurt. Flexibility and the two speed tests appear to reach maximum velocities prior to the height and weight spurts. Longitudinal principal component analysis was applied to the study of growth patterns of several somatic and motor characteristics. The results for height show three components sufficient to provide an adequate representation of the original information. The first component characterizes the general position of an individual growth curve. Components 2 and 3 reflect fluctuation in percentile level during the age period studied and can be conceived as indices of stability and are related to age at peak height velocity (APHV) and peak height velocity (PHV), respectively. Relationships between somatic characteristics, physical performance, and APHV have been studied in a sample of 173 Flemish boys, measured yearly between +/- 13 and +/- 18 years and again as adults at 30 years of age. The sample was divided into three contrasting maturity categories based on the APHV. There are consistent differences among boys of contrasting maturity status during adolescence in body weight, skeletal lengths and breadths, circumferences, and skinfolds on the trunk. There are no differences in skinfolds on the extremities. None of the differences in somatic dimensions and ratios among the three contrasting maturity groups are significant at 30 years of age except those for subscapular skinfold and the trunk/extremity skinfold ratio. During adolescence, speed of limb movement, explosive strength and static strength are negatively related to APHV; thus, early maturers performed better than late maturers. However, between late adolescence and adulthood (30 years), the late maturers not only caught up to the early maturers, but there were significant differences for explosive strength and functional strength in favor of late maturers. Finally, age-specific tracking, using inter-age correlations, of adult health- and performance-related fitness scores were investigated. In addition, the independent contribution of adolescent physical characteristics to the explanation of adult fitness scores was also studied. Tracking between age 13 and age 30 years was moderately high (46% of variance explained) for flexibility, low to moderate (between 19% and 27% of variance explained) for the other fitness parameters and low for pulse recovery and static strength (7% to 11% of variance explained). Between age 18 and age 30 years the tracking was high for flexibility, moderately high for explosive and static strength, and moderate for the other fitness parameters except for pulse recovery. The amount of variance of adult fitness levels explained increased significantly when other characteristics observed during adolescence entered the regressions or discriminant functions.
在比利时男孩的鲁汶生长研究中,对比利时男孩12至19岁期间的生长和身体表现进行了纵向研究。随后,对240名讲弗拉芒语的男性子样本在30岁和35岁时进行了重新检查。第一个问题涉及各种身体素质特征的个体生长模式。三项力量测试(静态、功能性、爆发力)显示出的曲线在质量上与身高和体重的曲线相似。它们的青春期突增发生在身高突增之后。柔韧性和两项速度测试似乎在身高和体重突增之前就达到了最大速度。纵向主成分分析被用于研究几种身体和运动特征的生长模式。身高的结果显示三个成分足以充分代表原始信息。第一个成分表征个体生长曲线的总体位置。成分2和3反映了在所研究年龄期间百分位数水平的波动,可以被视为稳定性指标,分别与身高速度峰值年龄(APHV)和身高速度峰值(PHV)相关。在173名弗拉芒男孩的样本中研究了身体特征、身体表现和APHV之间的关系,这些男孩在13岁左右至18岁左右每年进行测量,并在30岁时再次作为成年人进行测量。根据APHV将样本分为三个对比成熟类别。在青春期,成熟状态不同的男孩在体重、骨骼长度和宽度、周长以及躯干皮褶厚度方面存在一致差异。四肢皮褶厚度没有差异。在30岁时,三个对比成熟组之间的身体尺寸和比例差异均不显著,除了肩胛下皮褶厚度和躯干/四肢皮褶厚度比。在青春期,肢体运动速度、爆发力和静态力量与APHV呈负相关;因此,早熟者比晚熟者表现更好。然而,在青春期后期到成年期(30岁),晚熟者不仅赶上了早熟者,而且在爆发力和功能性力量方面存在显著差异,有利于晚熟者。最后,使用年龄间相关性对与成人健康和表现相关的体能得分进行了特定年龄追踪研究。此外,还研究了青少年身体特征对解释成人体能得分的独立贡献。13岁至30岁之间的柔韧性追踪中等偏高(解释了46%的方差),其他体能参数追踪低至中等(解释了19%至27%的方差),脉搏恢复和静态力量追踪低(解释了7%至11%的方差)。18岁至30岁之间,柔韧性追踪高,爆发力和静态力量追踪中等偏高,除脉搏恢复外的其他体能参数追踪中等。当将青春期观察到的其他特征纳入回归或判别函数时,解释的成人体能水平方差量显著增加。