Todd E C
Bureau of Microbial Hazards, Health Canada, Sir Banting Research Centre, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
World Health Stat Q. 1997;50(1-2):30-50.
Acute foodborne disease infections and intoxications are much more of a concern to governments and the food industry today than a few decades ago. Some of the factors that have led to this include the identification of new agents that have caused life-threatening conditions; the finding that traditional agents are being associated with foods that were of no concern previously: an increasing number of large outbreaks being reported; the impact of foodborne disease on children, the aging population and the immunocompromised; migrant populations demanding their traditional foods in the countries of settlement; the ease of worldwide shipment of fresh and frozen food; and the development of new food industries, including aquaculture. However, to meaningfully monitor increases or decreases in foodborne disease requires an effective surveillance system at the local, national and international levels. To date, resources have been limited for most countries and regions to do this, and our current knowledge is based, for the most part, on passive reporting mechanisms. Laboratory isolation data and reports of notifiable diseases have some value in observing timely changes in case numbers of some enteric diseases, but they usually do not indicate the reasons for these trends. Special epidemiological studies are useful for the area covered, but it is often questionable whether they can be extrapolated to other areas or countries. Outbreak investigations tell us that a certain set of circumstances led to illness and that another outbreak may occur under similar but not necessarily identical conditions. Control programmes have often been triggered by the conclusions from investigations of specific outbreaks. Unfortunately, the agent/ food combination leading to illness in many of the reported incidents were not predicted from existing databases, and no doubt foodborne agents will continue to surprise food control agencies in the foreseeable future. Nevertheless, data from around the world do show some common elements. Salmonella is still the most important agent causing acute foodborne disease, with Salmonella enteritidis and S. typhimurium being of most concern. Foods of animal origin, particularly, meat and eggs, were most often implicated. Desserts, ice cream and confectionery items were products also mentioned, but some of these would have egg as a raw or incompletely cooked ingredient. Incidents most frequently occurred in homes or restaurants, and the main factors contributing to outbreaks were poor temperature control in preparing, cooking and storing food. Clostridium botulinum, Salmonella and VTEC are more frequently documented in industrialized than in developing countries. ETEC, EPEC, Shigella, Vibrio cholerae and parasites are the main scourges in developing countries, but it is uncertain how many cases are attributed to food, to water or to person-to-person transmission. The apparent decrease of S. aureus and C. perfringens outbreaks in industrialized countries may be related to improved temperature control in the kitchen. An increasing number of illnesses are international in scope, with contamination in a commercial product occurring in one country and affecting persons in several other countries, or tourists being infected abroad and possibly transmitting the pathogen to others at home. For Salmonella, a rapid alert and response coordination is being encouraged through Salm-Net and other international programs. However, unless such a network is worldwide, tracking clusters of illnesses is going to fall on the countries where the first cases occur, and some of these have very limited resources for investigation and control. It was heartening to see funds recently being allocated to foodborne disease surveillance and control in several industrialized countries, but the same commitment is required by the World Health Organization for the international community.
与几十年前相比,急性食源性疾病感染和中毒如今更令各国政府和食品行业担忧。导致这种情况的一些因素包括:发现了可引发危及生命状况的新病原体;发现传统病原体与以前无关的食品有关联;报告的大规模疫情越来越多;食源性疾病对儿童、老年人口和免疫功能低下者的影响;移民群体在定居国要求提供其传统食品;新鲜和冷冻食品全球运输便捷;以及包括水产养殖在内的新食品行业的发展。然而,要切实监测食源性疾病的增减情况,需要在地方、国家和国际层面建立有效的监测系统。迄今为止,大多数国家和地区用于此目的的资源有限,而且我们目前的知识大多基于被动报告机制。实验室分离数据和法定报告疾病的数据对于观察某些肠道疾病病例数的及时变化有一定价值,但它们通常无法说明这些趋势的原因。专门的流行病学研究对所涉领域有用,但能否推广到其他地区或国家往往存疑。疫情调查告诉我们,特定的一系列情况导致了疾病发生,在类似但不一定完全相同的条件下可能会发生另一起疫情。控制方案往往是由特定疫情调查的结论引发的。不幸的是,许多报告事件中导致疾病的病原体/食品组合无法从现有数据库中预测到,而且在可预见的未来,食源性病原体无疑将继续让食品监管机构感到意外。尽管如此,来自世界各地的数据确实显示出一些共同因素。沙门氏菌仍然是导致急性食源性疾病的最重要病原体,肠炎沙门氏菌和鼠伤寒沙门氏菌最受关注。动物源性食品,特别是肉类和蛋类,最常被牵涉其中。甜点、冰淇淋和糖果类产品也被提及,但其中一些产品会以生鸡蛋或未完全煮熟的鸡蛋作为原料。事件最常发生在家庭或餐馆,导致疫情爆发的主要因素是食品制备、烹饪和储存过程中温度控制不当。肉毒梭菌、沙门氏菌和产志贺毒素大肠杆菌在工业化国家的记录比在发展中国家更频繁。肠毒素性大肠杆菌、肠致病性大肠杆菌、志贺氏菌、霍乱弧菌和寄生虫是发展中国家的主要祸害,但不确定有多少病例归因于食物、水或人际传播。工业化国家金黄色葡萄球菌和产气荚膜梭菌疫情明显减少可能与厨房温度控制改善有关。越来越多的疾病具有国际范围,一种商业产品在一个国家受到污染,影响其他几个国家的人,或者游客在国外感染并可能将病原体传播给国内其他人。对于沙门氏菌,正在通过沙门氏菌网络和其他国际项目鼓励快速警报和反应协调。然而,除非这样的网络覆盖全球,追踪疾病集群的工作将落在首例病例发生的国家,而其中一些国家的调查和控制资源非常有限。很高兴看到最近几个工业化国家为食源性疾病监测和控制拨款,但世界卫生组织也需要为国际社会做出同样的承诺。