Duchesne G M, Stenning S P, Aass N, Mead G M, Fosså S D, Oliver R T, Horwich A, Read G, Roberts I T, Rustin G, Cullen M H, Kaye S B, Harland S J, Cook P A
Department of Oncology, UCL Medical School, Middlesex Hospital, London, U.K.
Eur J Cancer. 1997 May;33(6):829-35. doi: 10.1016/s0959-8049(97)00033-6.
In a retrospective study, data from 302 patients with metastatic testicular seminoma treated with chemotherapy between 1978 and 1990 in 10 European centres were analysed to evaluate the role, if any, of postchemotherapy treatment with irradiation. The primary endpoint of this study was the progression-free survival rate after chemotherapy with or without additional radiotherapy. This was related to the type of primary chemotherapy, sites and sizes of pre- and postchemotherapy masses, the extent of surgical resection after chemotherapy and the use of radiotherapy. 174 patients had residual disease at the end of chemotherapy. The most important prognostic factors for progression were the presence of any visceral metastases or raised LDH prechemotherapy, and the presence of residual disease at visceral sites after chemotherapy. Approximately half the patients with residual masses underwent postchemotherapy radiotherapy, with selection based predominantly on institutional practice. In patients receiving platinum-based chemotherapy, no significant difference was detected in progression-free survival whether or not radiotherapy was employed. Patients receiving BEP (bleomycin, etoposide and cisplatin) had a progression-free survival rate of 88% (95% CI, 80-96%) uninfluenced by postchemotherapy radiotherapy. In patients with residual masses confined to the abdomen after platinum-based chemotherapy, the absolute benefit to radiotherapy was estimated to be 2.3%. The potential benefit of postchemotherapy radiotherapy is minimal, and so it is concluded that the use of adjuvant radiotherapy to residual masses after platinum-based chemotherapy for metastatic seminoma is unnecessary.
在一项回顾性研究中,分析了1978年至1990年间欧洲10个中心接受化疗的302例转移性睾丸精原细胞瘤患者的数据,以评估化疗后放疗的作用(若有)。本研究的主要终点是化疗后有无额外放疗的无进展生存率。这与初始化疗类型、化疗前后肿块的部位和大小、化疗后手术切除范围以及放疗的使用有关。174例患者在化疗结束时仍有残留病灶。进展的最重要预后因素是化疗前存在任何内脏转移或乳酸脱氢酶升高,以及化疗后内脏部位存在残留病灶。大约一半有残留肿块的患者接受了化疗后放疗,选择主要基于机构的做法。在接受铂类化疗的患者中,无论是否采用放疗,无进展生存率均无显著差异。接受博来霉素、依托泊苷和顺铂(BEP)方案化疗的患者无进展生存率为88%(95%可信区间,80 - 96%),不受化疗后放疗的影响。在铂类化疗后残留肿块局限于腹部的患者中,放疗的绝对获益估计为2.3%。化疗后放疗的潜在获益极小,因此得出结论,对于转移性精原细胞瘤,在铂类化疗后对残留肿块使用辅助放疗是不必要的。