Bodis-Wollner I, Brannan J R
College of Optometry, State University of New York, Brooklyn 11203, USA.
Clin Neurosci. 1997;4(5):284-91.
Visual sensitivity was evaluated in the central 16 degrees of the visual field in normal subjects, in patients with glaucomatous optic neuropathy, in glaucoma suspects, and in eyes of patients with multiple sclerosis without evidence of active optic neuritis. A novel method was used to assess sensitivity called contrast perimetry (CP). CP essentially samples every point in the central 16 degrees field, and the normal and deviant responses are relatable to spatial summation of contrast signals. In each visual field quadrant 1 cycles/degree sinusoidal grating stimuli limited in area by a gaussian circular aperture (called a Gabor stimulus) were presented. Contrast sensitivity was measured as a function of stimulus size. The normal curve is nearly S-shaped: For small Gabors contrast sensitivity increases slowly, then accelerates and then flattens again. Patients' results fell into two broad categories: a loss more or only evident for small Gabors and another type of loss for both small and large Gabor size. Glaucoma suspect and most glaucoma eyes showed predominant losses to small Gabors. There were more eyes and more VF quadrants identified by contrast perimetry as abnormal compared to the diagnostic yield of the Humphrey 30-2 (central) visual field even though a Humphrey VF defect was defined liberally. Apparently, contrast perimetry may yield diagnostically useful information of paracentral visual sensitivity. Furthermore, the results suggest that selective losses in POAG and some glaucoma suspects occur to spatially broad-band retinal mechanisms, presumably ganglion cells.
在正常受试者、青光眼性视神经病变患者、青光眼疑似患者以及无活动性视神经炎证据的多发性硬化症患者的眼睛中,对视野中央16度范围内的视觉敏感度进行了评估。采用了一种名为对比视野计(CP)的新方法来评估敏感度。CP基本上对中央16度视野中的每个点进行采样,正常和异常反应与对比信号的空间总和相关。在每个视野象限中,呈现由高斯圆形孔径限制面积的1周期/度正弦光栅刺激(称为加博尔刺激)。对比敏感度作为刺激大小的函数进行测量。正常曲线近似S形:对于小的加博尔刺激,对比敏感度缓慢增加,然后加速,然后再次趋于平稳。患者的结果分为两大类:一种损失更多或仅在小加博尔刺激时明显,另一种类型的损失在小和大加博尔刺激大小时均存在。青光眼疑似患者和大多数青光眼患者的眼睛对小加博尔刺激的损失最为明显。与Humphrey 30-2(中央)视野的诊断率相比,通过对比视野计确定为异常的眼睛和视野象限更多,尽管对Humphrey视野缺损的定义较为宽松。显然,对比视野计可能会产生关于旁中心视觉敏感度的诊断有用信息。此外,结果表明,原发性开角型青光眼和一些青光眼疑似患者的选择性损失发生在空间宽带视网膜机制,可能是神经节细胞。