Suppr超能文献

使用正弦刺激估计视野中的空间尺度。

Estimation of spatial scale across the visual field using sinusoidal stimuli.

机构信息

School of Optometry, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana, USA.

出版信息

Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2012 Feb 2;53(2):633-9. doi: 10.1167/iovs.10-6674. Print 2012 Feb.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To characterize contrast sensitivity for sinusoidal stimuli across the central visual field and help bridge the gap between perimetry and visual psychophysics by developing a contrast-sensitivity template for spatial scale (experiment 1) and testing it on a new dataset (experiment 2).

METHODS

In experiment 1, 40 subjects free of eye disease, ages 43 to 84 years, had one eye tested. Twenty-three locations along the horizontal and vertical meridians were tested with sinusoidal stimuli having peak spatial frequencies of 0.5, 1.0, and 2.0 cpd and a spatial bandwidth of 1.0 octave. Contrast sensitivity functions were fit with a low-pass template slid horizontally on a log-log plot by a spatial scale factor. In experiment 2, 29 of the original subjects had one eye tested. Twenty-six locations in grid form were tested with sinusoidal stimuli having peak spatial frequencies of 0.375, 0.53, 0.75, and 1.5 cpd. Spatial scale values were predicted using the 0.375 cpd data and template and compared to empirical values determined from the remaining data.

RESULTS

In experiment 1, the change in spatial scale alone fit the mean sensitivities well (residual sum of squares = 0.01 log unit). Spatial scale increased with eccentricity except for horizontal nasal displacements between 3° and 15°. In experiment 2, differences between empirical and predicted spatial scale values were within ±0.1 log unit (mean and SEM: 0.00 ± 0.01 log unit).

CONCLUSIONS

Spatial scale characterized the visual field tested in perimetry well and can contribute to further linkage between clinical perimetry and basic vision science.

摘要

目的

通过开发一种用于空间尺度的对比敏感度模板(实验 1)并在新数据集上进行测试(实验 2),来描述正弦刺激在中央视野中的对比敏感度,并帮助缩小视野计和视觉心理物理学之间的差距。

方法

在实验 1 中,40 名无眼部疾病的受试者(年龄 43 至 84 岁),每只眼睛进行一次测试。使用具有 0.5、1.0 和 2.0 cpd 峰值空间频率和 1.0 个倍频程空间带宽的正弦刺激,在水平和垂直子午线的 23 个位置进行测试。对比敏感度函数通过空间尺度因子在对数-对数图上水平滑动的低通模板进行拟合。在实验 2 中,对 29 名原始受试者中的一只眼睛进行了测试。在网格形式的 26 个位置上,使用具有 0.375、0.53、0.75 和 1.5 cpd 峰值空间频率的正弦刺激进行测试。使用 0.375 cpd 数据和模板预测空间尺度值,并将其与从其余数据确定的经验值进行比较。

结果

在实验 1 中,仅空间尺度的变化就能很好地拟合平均灵敏度(残差平方和= 0.01 对数单位)。空间尺度随离轴距离的增加而增加,但 3°至 15°之间的水平鼻侧位移除外。在实验 2 中,经验值和预测值之间的空间尺度差异在±0.1 对数单位内(平均值和 SEM:0.00 ± 0.01 对数单位)。

结论

空间尺度很好地描述了视野计测试中的视野,可以进一步促进临床视野计和基础视觉科学之间的联系。

相似文献

1
Estimation of spatial scale across the visual field using sinusoidal stimuli.使用正弦刺激估计视野中的空间尺度。
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2012 Feb 2;53(2):633-9. doi: 10.1167/iovs.10-6674. Print 2012 Feb.
3
Blur-resistant perimetric stimuli.抗模糊视野刺激
Optom Vis Sci. 2013 May;90(5):466-74. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0b013e31828fc91d.
5
Individual differences in the shape of the nasal visual field.鼻侧视野形状的个体差异。
Vision Res. 2017 Dec;141:23-29. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2016.04.001. Epub 2016 Jun 16.
6
8
Behavioral perimetry in monkeys.猴子的行为视野检查
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1993 Jan;34(1):31-40.

引用本文的文献

10
Individual differences in the shape of the nasal visual field.鼻侧视野形状的个体差异。
Vision Res. 2017 Dec;141:23-29. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2016.04.001. Epub 2016 Jun 16.

本文引用的文献

9
Optical and photoelectric analog of the eye.眼睛的光学和光电模拟。
J Opt Soc Am. 1956 Sep;46(9):721-39. doi: 10.1364/josa.46.000721.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验