Suppr超能文献

针对青霉素酰基决定簇的IgE抗体的测定:三种放射变应原吸附试验方法的敏感性和特异性比较。

Determination of IgE antibodies to the benzylpenicilloyl determinant: a comparison of the sensitivity and specificity of three radio allergo sorbent test methods.

作者信息

Garcia J J, Blanca M, Moreno F, Vega J M, Mayorga C, Fernandez J, Juarez C, Romano A, de Ramon E

机构信息

Allergy Unit, Carlos Haya Hospital, Malaga, Spain.

出版信息

J Clin Lab Anal. 1997;11(5):251-7. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1098-2825(1997)11:5<251::aid-jcla3>3.0.co;2-a.

Abstract

The quantitation of in vitro IgE antibodies to the benzylpenicilloyl determinant (BPO) is a useful tool for evaluating suspected penicillin allergic subjects. Although many different methods have been employed, few studies have compared their diagnostic specificity and sensitivity. In this study, the sensitivity and specificity of three different radio allergo sorbent test (RAST) methods for quantitating specific IgE antibodies to the BPO determinant were compared. Thirty positive control sera (serum samples from penicillin allergic subjects with a positive clinical history and a positive penicillin skin test) and 30 negative control sera (sera from subjects with no history of penicillin allergy and negative skin tests) were tested for BPO-specific IgE antibodies by RAST using three different conjugates coupled to the solid phase: benzylpenicillin conjugated to polylysine (BPO-PLL), benzylpenicillin conjugated to human serum albumin (BPO-HSA), and benzylpenicillin conjugated to an aminospacer (BPO-SP). Receiver operator control curves (ROC analysis) were carried out by determining different cut-off points between positive and negative values. Contingence tables were constructed and sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive values (PV-), and positive predictive values (PV+) were calculated. Pearson correlation coefficients (r) and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) were determined and the differences between methods were compared by chi 2 analysis. Analysis of the areas defined by the ROC curves showed statistical differences among the three methods. When cut-off points for optimal sensitivity and specificity were chosen, the BPO-HSA assay was less sensitive and less specific and had a lower PV- and PV+ than the BPO-PLL and BPO-SP assays. Assessment of r and ICC indicated that the correlation was very high, but the concordance between the PLL and SP methods was higher than between the PLL and HSA or SP and HSA methods. We conclude that for quantitating IgE antibodies by RAST to the BPO determinant, BPO-SP or BPO-PLL conjugates offer advantages in sensitivity and specificity compared with BPO-HSA. These results support and extend previous in vitro studies by our group and highlight the importance of the carrier for RAST assays.

摘要

体外定量检测针对苄基青霉噻唑决定簇(BPO)的IgE抗体是评估疑似青霉素过敏受试者的一项有用工具。尽管已采用了许多不同方法,但很少有研究比较它们的诊断特异性和敏感性。在本研究中,比较了三种不同的放射变应原吸附试验(RAST)方法定量检测针对BPO决定簇的特异性IgE抗体的敏感性和特异性。使用与固相偶联的三种不同结合物,通过RAST检测30份阳性对照血清(来自有青霉素过敏临床病史且青霉素皮肤试验阳性的受试者的血清样本)和30份阴性对照血清(来自无青霉素过敏史且皮肤试验阴性的受试者的血清)中的BPO特异性IgE抗体:与聚赖氨酸偶联的苄青霉素(BPO-PLL)、与人类血清白蛋白偶联的苄青霉素(BPO-HSA)以及与氨基间隔臂偶联的苄青霉素(BPO-SP)。通过确定阳性和阴性值之间的不同截断点进行受试者操作特征曲线(ROC分析)。构建列联表并计算敏感性、特异性、阴性预测值(PV-)和阳性预测值(PV+)。确定Pearson相关系数(r)和组内相关系数(ICC),并通过卡方分析比较方法之间的差异。对ROC曲线所界定区域的分析显示三种方法之间存在统计学差异。当选择最佳敏感性和特异性的截断点时,BPO-HSA检测法的敏感性和特异性较低,且PV-和PV+均低于BPO-PLL和BPO-SP检测法。对r和ICC的评估表明相关性非常高,但PLL和SP方法之间的一致性高于PLL和HSA方法之间或SP和HSA方法之间的一致性。我们得出结论,对于通过RAST定量检测针对BPO决定簇的IgE抗体,与BPO-HSA相比,BPO-SP或BPO-PLL结合物在敏感性和特异性方面具有优势。这些结果支持并扩展了我们小组先前的体外研究,并突出了载体对RAST检测的重要性。

相似文献

8
Hypersensitivity reactions to penicillins: studies in a group of patients with negative benzylpenicillin G skin test.
J Clin Pharm Ther. 2009 Jun;34(3):249-54. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2710.2008.01013.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Antibiotic Allergy De-Labeling: A Pathway against Antibiotic Resistance.
Antibiotics (Basel). 2022 Aug 3;11(8):1055. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics11081055.
2
Accurate interval estimation for the risk difference in an incomplete correlated 2 × 2 table: Calf immunity analysis.
PLoS One. 2022 Jul 22;17(7):e0272007. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0272007. eCollection 2022.
3
Focus on the agents most frequently responsible for perioperative anaphylaxis.
Clin Mol Allergy. 2018 Jul 9;16:16. doi: 10.1186/s12948-018-0094-7. eCollection 2018.
4
Stamping a Case of Cutaneous Adverse Drug Reaction: Proving Beyond Causality Assessment.
Indian J Dermatol. 2018 Mar-Apr;63(2):99-106. doi: 10.4103/ijd.IJD_580_17.
5
The Value of In Vitro Tests to DiminishDrug Challenges.
Int J Mol Sci. 2017 Jun 7;18(6):1222. doi: 10.3390/ijms18061222.
6
In Vitro Diagnostic Testing for Antibiotic Allergy.
Allergy Asthma Immunol Res. 2017 Jul;9(4):288-298. doi: 10.4168/aair.2017.9.4.288.
7
Study of protein haptenation by amoxicillin through the use of a biotinylated antibiotic.
PLoS One. 2014 Mar 3;9(3):e90891. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0090891. eCollection 2014.
8
Immunologic evaluation of drug allergy.
Allergy Asthma Immunol Res. 2012 Sep;4(5):251-63. doi: 10.4168/aair.2012.4.5.251. Epub 2012 May 30.
9
Update on the management of antibiotic allergy.
Allergy Asthma Immunol Res. 2010 Apr;2(2):77-86. doi: 10.4168/aair.2010.2.2.77. Epub 2010 Mar 24.

本文引用的文献

1
Hypersensitivity to penicillenic acid derivatives in human beings with penicillin allergy.
J Exp Med. 1962 Apr 1;115(4):821-38. doi: 10.1084/jem.115.4.821.
2
RECENT CLINICAL AND IMMUNOLOGICAL ASPECTS OF PENICILLIN ALLERGY.
Int Arch Allergy Appl Immunol. 1965;27:221-56. doi: 10.1159/000229614.
5
Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for detection of antibodies to the unmodified beta-lactam ring.
Allergy. 1993 Apr;48(3):151-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1398-9995.1993.tb00705.x.
8
Epitope mapping of beta-lactam antibiotics with the use of monoclonal antibodies.
Toxicology. 1995 Mar 31;97(1-3):225-34. doi: 10.1016/0300-483x(94)02983-2.
10
Diagnosis of penicillin allergy by means of Phadebas RAST penicilloyl G and V and skin tests.
Clin Allergy. 1981 Mar;11(2):155-60. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2222.1981.tb01579.x.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验