Ghiasi H, Roopenian D C, Slanina S, Cai S, Nesburn A B, Wechsler S L
Cedars-Sinai Medical Center Los Angeles CA 90048, USA.
Immunology. 1997 Jul;91(3):430-5. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2567.1997.00261.x.
To investigate the importance of major histocompatability complex (MHC) class I- and MHC class II-dependent immune responses in herpes simplex virus-1 (HSV-1) vaccine efficacy, groups of beta 2% (MHC I-) and Ab% (MHC II-) mice were inoculated with various vaccines, and then challenged intraperitoneally with HSV-1. Following vaccination with either live avirulent HSV-1, expressed HSV-1 glycoprotein D (gD), or a mixture of seven expressed HSV-1 glycoproteins (7gPs), Ab% (MHC-II-) mice developed no enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) or neutralizing antibody titres. In contrast, significant ELISA and neutralizing antibody titres were induced in beta 2m% (MHC-I-) mice by all three vaccines. The neutralizing antibody titres were similar for all three vaccines, but were only approximately 1/4 to 1/3 of that developed in C57BL/6 (parental) mice vaccinated with the same antigens. All three vaccines protected 100% of the wild-type C57BL/6 mice against lethal challenge with 2 x 10(7) plaque-forming units (PFU) of HSV-1. The live virus vaccine and the 7gPs vaccine also protected 80% of the beta 2m% mice against the same lethal HSV-1 challenge dose. In contrast, in Abo/o mice, none of the vaccines provided significant protection against the same lethal challenge dose of HSV-1. However, at a lower challenge dose of 2 x 10(6) PFU, all three vaccines protected 70-80% of the vaccinated Ab% mice (compared to only 10% survival in mock vaccinated controls). Thus, vaccination provided some protection against lethal HSV-1 challenge in both beta 2m% and Ab% mice; however, the protection was less than that seen in the parental C57BL/6 mice. In addition, Ab% mice were less well protected by vaccination than were beta 2m% mice. Our results suggest that (1) both MHC-I and MHC-II are involved in vaccine efficacy against HSV-1 challenge; (2) both types of responses must be present for maximum vaccine efficacy: and (3) the MHC-II-dependent immune response appeared to be more important than the MHC-I-dependent immune response for vaccine efficacy against HSV-I challenge.
为了研究主要组织相容性复合体(MHC)I类和MHC II类依赖性免疫反应在单纯疱疹病毒1型(HSV-1)疫苗效力中的重要性,将β2m%(MHC I-)和Ab%(MHC II-)小鼠分组,接种各种疫苗,然后腹腔注射HSV-1进行攻毒。在用减毒活HSV-1、表达的HSV-1糖蛋白D(gD)或七种表达的HSV-1糖蛋白混合物(7gP)进行疫苗接种后,Ab%(MHC-II-)小鼠未产生酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA)或中和抗体滴度。相比之下,所有三种疫苗均在β2m%(MHC-I-)小鼠中诱导出显著的ELISA和中和抗体滴度。三种疫苗的中和抗体滴度相似,但仅约为接种相同抗原的C57BL/6(亲代)小鼠所产生滴度的1/4至1/3。所有三种疫苗均能100%保护野生型C57BL/6小鼠免受2×10⁷空斑形成单位(PFU)的HSV-1致死性攻毒。减毒活病毒疫苗和7gP疫苗也能保护80%的β2m%小鼠免受相同致死剂量的HSV-1攻毒。相比之下,在Abo/o小鼠中,没有一种疫苗能对相同致死剂量的HSV-1攻毒提供显著保护。然而,在较低的2×10⁶ PFU攻毒剂量下,所有三种疫苗均能保护70 - 80%接种疫苗的Ab%小鼠(相比之下,mock接种对照中只有10%存活)。因此,疫苗接种为β2m%和Ab%小鼠提供了一定程度的抗HSV-1致死性攻毒保护;然而,这种保护作用小于亲代C57BL/6小鼠中的情况。此外,Ab%小鼠接种疫苗后的保护效果不如β2m%小鼠。我们的结果表明:(1)MHC-I和MHC-II均参与抗HSV-1攻毒的疫苗效力;(2)两种类型的反应都必须存在才能达到最大疫苗效力;(3)对于抗HSV-1攻毒的疫苗效力而言,MHC-II依赖性免疫反应似乎比MHC-I依赖性免疫反应更重要。