• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
A cost effective, community based heart health promotion project in England: prospective comparative study.英国一项基于社区的具有成本效益的心脏健康促进项目:前瞻性比较研究
BMJ. 1997 Sep 6;315(7108):582-5. doi: 10.1136/bmj.315.7108.582.
2
The impact of heart health promotion on coronary heart disease lifestyle risk factors in schoolchildren: lessons learnt from a community-based project.心脏健康促进对学童冠心病生活方式风险因素的影响:基于社区项目的经验教训。
Public Health. 1997 Jul;111(4):231-7.
3
Costs and cost effectiveness of cardiovascular screening and intervention: the British family heart study.心血管筛查与干预的成本及成本效益:英国家庭心脏研究
BMJ. 1996 May 18;312(7041):1269-73. doi: 10.1136/bmj.312.7041.1269.
4
Strategies for reducing coronary risk factors in primary care: which is most cost effective?基层医疗中降低冠状动脉危险因素的策略:哪种最具成本效益?
BMJ. 1995 Apr 29;310(6987):1109-12. doi: 10.1136/bmj.310.6987.1109.
5
What can be concluded from the Oxcheck and British family heart studies: commentary on cost effectiveness analyses.从Oxcheck研究和英国家庭心脏研究中可以得出什么结论:对成本效益分析的评论
BMJ. 1996 May 18;312(7041):1274-8. doi: 10.1136/bmj.312.7041.1274.
6
Predicting the impact of population level risk reduction in cardio-vascular disease and stroke on acute hospital admission rates over a 5 year period--a pilot study.预测5年内心血管疾病和中风的人群水平风险降低对急性住院率的影响——一项试点研究。
Public Health. 2006 Dec;120(12):1140-8. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2006.10.012. Epub 2006 Nov 3.
7
Effect of postal prompts to patients and general practitioners on the quality of primary care after a coronary event (POST): randomised controlled trial.向患者及全科医生发送邮政提示对冠心病事件后初级保健质量的影响(POST):随机对照试验
BMJ. 1999 Jun 5;318(7197):1522-6. doi: 10.1136/bmj.318.7197.1522.
8
Secondary prevention clinics for coronary heart disease: four year follow up of a randomised controlled trial in primary care.冠心病二级预防诊所:初级保健中一项随机对照试验的四年随访
BMJ. 2003 Jan 11;326(7380):84. doi: 10.1136/bmj.326.7380.84.
9
Community-based youth tobacco control interventions: cost effectiveness of the Full Court Press project.基于社区的青少年烟草控制干预措施:“全场紧逼”项目的成本效益
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2006;5(3):167-76. doi: 10.2165/00148365-200605030-00003.
10
Health promotion in primary care: modelling the impact of intervention on coronary heart disease and stroke.初级保健中的健康促进:模拟干预对冠心病和中风的影响。
J Public Health Med. 1995 Jun;17(2):150-6. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.pubmed.a043085.

引用本文的文献

1
Long-term effectiveness of a lifestyle intervention on the prevention of type 2 diabetes in a middle-income country.生活方式干预在中等收入国家预防 2 型糖尿病的长期效果。
Sci Rep. 2020 Aug 25;10(1):14173. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-71119-2.
2
The Economic Impact of Smoking and of Reducing Smoking Prevalence: Review of Evidence.吸烟及降低吸烟率的经济影响:证据综述
Tob Use Insights. 2015 Jul 14;8:1-35. doi: 10.4137/TUI.S15628. eCollection 2015.
3
Community wide interventions for increasing physical activity.全社区范围内增加身体活动的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Jan 5;1(1):CD008366. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008366.pub3.
4
Costs of the 'Hartslag Limburg' community heart health intervention.“哈特斯拉格林堡”社区心脏健康干预措施的成本。
BMC Public Health. 2006 Mar 2;6:51. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-6-51.
5
Cost effectiveness of a community based research project to help women quit smoking.一个基于社区的帮助女性戒烟研究项目的成本效益
Tob Control. 2005 Feb;14(1):37-42. doi: 10.1136/tc.2003.005470.
6
Community interventions for reducing smoking among adults.减少成年人吸烟的社区干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2002;2002(3):CD001745. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001745.
7
Dietary advice given by a dietitian versus other health professional or self-help resources to reduce blood cholesterol.营养师给出的与其他健康专业人士或自助资源相比的降低血液胆固醇的饮食建议。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2001;2003(1):CD001366. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001366.
8
The impact of a community-based heart disease prevention program in a low-income, inner-city neighborhood.一项针对低收入城市中心社区的社区心脏病预防项目的影响。
Am J Public Health. 1999 Dec;89(12):1819-26. doi: 10.2105/ajph.89.12.1819.
9
Guidance for commissioners on the cost effectiveness of smoking cessation interventions.戒烟干预措施成本效益专员指南。
Thorax. 1998 Dec;53 Suppl 5 Pt 2(Suppl 5):S1-38.
10
Effects of the Heartbeat Wales programme. Effects of government policies on health behaviour must be studied.威尔士心跳计划的影响。必须研究政府政策对健康行为的影响。
BMJ. 1998 Sep 26;317(7162):886.

英国一项基于社区的具有成本效益的心脏健康促进项目:前瞻性比较研究

A cost effective, community based heart health promotion project in England: prospective comparative study.

作者信息

Baxter T, Milner P, Wilson K, Leaf M, Nicholl J, Freeman J, Cooper N

机构信息

Rotherham Health Authorities.

出版信息

BMJ. 1997 Sep 6;315(7108):582-5. doi: 10.1136/bmj.315.7108.582.

DOI:10.1136/bmj.315.7108.582
PMID:9302957
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2127433/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether a community based coronary heart disease health promotion project, undertaken over four years, was associated with changes in the prevalence in adults of lifestyle risk factors known to affect the development of coronary heart disease, and to estimate whether such an approach was cost effective.

DESIGN

Prospective, comparative study of the effects of a health promotion intervention on coronary heart disease lifestyle risk factors, assessed by postal questionnaire sent to a randomly chosen sample, both at baseline and after four years.

SUBJECTS

Intervention and control populations of adults aged 18-64 in Rotherham, both from areas with a high incidence of coronary heart disease and similar socioeconomic composition.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Changes in prevalence of lifestyle risk factors between the control and intervention communities from 1991 to 1995. The effect of the intervention on certain lifestyle behaviours was evaluated using multiple logistic regression to model the proportion with a particular behaviour in the study communities as a function of age (18-40 or 41-64 years), sex, the year of observation (1991 or 1995), and area (intervention of control).

RESULTS

6.9% fewer people smoked and 8.7% more drank low fat milk in the intervention area, but no other statistically significant changes between the areas were detected. The estimated cost per life year gained was pounds 31.

CONCLUSIONS

It is possible to have a cost effective impact on coronary heart disease lifestyle risk factors in a population of adults over four years using only modest resources.

摘要

目的

确定一项为期四年的社区冠心病健康促进项目是否与已知会影响冠心病发展的成人生活方式风险因素患病率的变化相关,并评估这种方法是否具有成本效益。

设计

对健康促进干预对冠心病生活方式风险因素影响的前瞻性比较研究,通过在基线和四年后向随机抽取的样本邮寄问卷进行评估。

研究对象

罗瑟勒姆18 - 64岁的成年干预组和对照组人群,均来自冠心病高发地区且社会经济构成相似。

主要观察指标

1991年至1995年对照组和干预组社区生活方式风险因素患病率的变化。使用多元逻辑回归评估干预对某些生活方式行为的影响,以将研究社区中具有特定行为的比例建模为年龄(18 - 40岁或41 - 64岁)、性别、观察年份(1991年或1995年)和地区(干预组或对照组)的函数。

结果

干预地区吸烟人数减少6.9%,饮用低脂牛奶的人数增加8.7%,但未检测到其他具有统计学意义的地区间变化。每获得一个生命年的估计成本为31英镑。

结论

仅使用适度资源,有可能在四年内对成年人群体的冠心病生活方式风险因素产生具有成本效益的影响。