• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腹腔镜胆囊切除术时代的胆石性胰腺炎

Gallstone pancreatitis in the era of laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

作者信息

Bulkin A J, Tebyani N, Dorazio R A

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Kaiser Permanente Medical Center, Los Angeles, California 90027, USA.

出版信息

Am Surg. 1997 Oct;63(10):900-3.

PMID:9322669
Abstract

This study focused on the management of all patients admitted with a diagnosis of gallstone pancreatitis (GP) since the advent of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in our institution. The inpatient and outpatient medical records of all 172 patients with GP admitted from November 1990 to June 1995 were retrospectively reviewed. The main outcome measures were the effectiveness of and complications associated with surgical and endoscopic treatment of GP, including the incidence and management of common bile duct stones. One hundred fifty-four patients underwent cholecystectomy (89 laparoscopic and 65 open), usually within 3 to 5 days after admission when the amylase had returned to normal or nearly normal. There was a progressive increase in the use of laparoscopy, with 6 per cent of cholecystectomies in 1991 performed laparoscopically and 88 per cent in the first half of 1995. Overall conversion rate was 16 per cent. A total of 33 patients (19.2%) underwent endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP): 9 preoperatively and 12 postoperatively, and in 12 patients it served as definitive treatment due to advanced age and/or serious associated medical problems. Of the 24 positive intraoperative cholangiograms, 14 had common bile duct (CBD) stones. CBD stones were found in a total of only 32 patients (18.6%). Laparoscopic CBD exploration was not performed during this time period. There were 16 (8.6%) complications and two deaths (1.2%). Six patients refused all treatment. There were no unsuccessful postoperative ERCPs, and no patient underwent reoperation. In conclusion, our approach to patients with GP is safe and effective, with a low rate of complications. Considering the relatively low incidence of CBD stones in GP (18.6% in this series), routine preoperative ERCP is not indicated, because it has some risk and the vast majority of studies would be negative. In certain highly selected patients with multiple medical problems and/or advanced age, endoscopic sphincterotomy may be considered the definitive treatment. The optimal management of GP and CBD stones, however, depends on the skills and resources available as well as patient preference.

摘要

本研究聚焦于自我院开展腹腔镜胆囊切除术以来,所有诊断为胆石性胰腺炎(GP)的住院患者的管理。回顾性分析了1990年11月至1995年6月期间收治的172例GP患者的住院和门诊病历。主要观察指标为GP手术及内镜治疗的有效性和相关并发症,包括胆总管结石的发生率及处理情况。154例患者接受了胆囊切除术(89例腹腔镜手术,65例开放手术),通常在入院后3至5天淀粉酶恢复正常或接近正常时进行。腹腔镜手术的应用呈逐渐增加趋势,1991年腹腔镜胆囊切除术占比6%,1995年上半年占比88%。总体中转率为16%。共有33例患者(19.2%)接受了内镜逆行胰胆管造影(ERCP):9例术前进行,12例术后进行,12例因高龄和/或严重合并症而作为确定性治疗。在24例术中胆管造影阳性患者中,14例有胆总管(CBD)结石。总共仅32例患者(18.6%)发现有CBD结石。在此期间未进行腹腔镜胆总管探查。发生16例(8.6%)并发症,2例死亡(1.2%)。6例患者拒绝所有治疗。术后ERCP均未失败,也没有患者接受再次手术。总之,我们对GP患者的治疗方法安全有效,并发症发生率低。鉴于GP中CBD结石的发生率相对较低(本系列为18.6%),不建议常规进行术前ERCP,因为其有一定风险且绝大多数检查结果为阴性。对于某些经过严格筛选的有多种合并症和/或高龄患者,内镜括约肌切开术可考虑作为确定性治疗。然而,GP和CBD结石的最佳管理取决于可用的技术和资源以及患者的偏好。

相似文献

1
Gallstone pancreatitis in the era of laparoscopic cholecystectomy.腹腔镜胆囊切除术时代的胆石性胰腺炎
Am Surg. 1997 Oct;63(10):900-3.
2
Single-step treatment of gall bladder and bile duct stones: a combined endoscopic-laparoscopic technique.胆囊和胆管结石的单步治疗:一种内镜-腹腔镜联合技术。
Int J Surg. 2009 Aug;7(4):338-46. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2009.05.005. Epub 2009 May 27.
3
Results of laparoscopic cholecystectomy for the treatment of gallstone pancreatitis.腹腔镜胆囊切除术治疗胆石性胰腺炎的结果
Am Surg. 1994 Jul;60(7):495-8; discussion 498-9.
4
Effect of endoscopic sphincterotomy and interval cholecystectomy on late outcome after gallstone pancreatitis.内镜括约肌切开术和间隔期胆囊切除术对胆石性胰腺炎晚期结局的影响。
Br J Surg. 1998 Mar;85(3):333-6. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2168.1998.00626.x.
5
The role of ERCP in patients after laparoscopic cholecystectomy.内镜逆行胰胆管造影术在腹腔镜胆囊切除术后患者中的作用。
Am J Gastroenterol. 1994 Sep;89(9):1523-7.
6
["Sequential" treatment: is it the best alternative in cholecysto-choledochal lithiasis?].["序贯"治疗:它是胆囊胆总管结石的最佳选择吗?]
Chir Ital. 2002 Nov-Dec;54(6):785-98.
7
Outcome of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in acute biliary pancreatitis.急性胆源性胰腺炎行腹腔镜胆囊切除术的结果
Saudi Med J. 2003 Jun;24(6):660-4.
8
[Laparoscopic cholecystectomy and lithiasis of the common bile duct: prospective study on the importance of preoperative endoscopic ultrasonography and endoscopic retrograde cholangiography].[腹腔镜胆囊切除术与胆总管结石:关于术前内镜超声检查和内镜逆行胰胆管造影重要性的前瞻性研究]
Gastroenterol Clin Biol. 1998 Oct;22(10):759-65.
9
[Selection criteria for endoscopic cholangiopancreatography before laparoscopic cholecystectomy].[腹腔镜胆囊切除术前行内镜下胰胆管造影术的选择标准]
Rev Gastroenterol Mex. 2002 Jul-Sep;67(3):166-70.
10
Prediction of common bile duct stones: its validation in laparoscopic cholecystectomy.胆总管结石的预测:其在腹腔镜胆囊切除术中的验证
Hepatogastroenterology. 1997 Nov-Dec;44(18):1574-9.

引用本文的文献

1
Mild acute biliary pancreatitis vs cholelithiasis: are there differences in the rate of choledocholithiasis?轻度急性胆源性胰腺炎与胆石症:胆总管结石发生率是否存在差异?
J Gastrointest Surg. 2007 Jul;11(7):875-9. doi: 10.1007/s11605-007-0148-5.
2
The role of intraoperative cholangiogram in the management of patients recovering from acute biliary pancreatitis.术中胆管造影在急性胆源性胰腺炎恢复患者管理中的作用。
Surg Endosc. 2007 Sep;21(9):1549-52. doi: 10.1007/s00464-006-9169-5. Epub 2007 Feb 8.
3
Effect of intraoperative cholangiography during cholecystectomy on outcome after gallstone pancreatitis.
胆囊切除术期间术中胆管造影对胆石性胰腺炎术后结局的影响。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2002 Jul-Aug;6(4):575-81. doi: 10.1016/s1091-255x(01)00017-8.
4
Laparoscopic treatment of severe acute pancreatitis.腹腔镜治疗重症急性胰腺炎。
Surg Endosc. 2001 Feb;15(2):146-8. doi: 10.1007/s004640000349.