Suppr超能文献

1%盐酸卡替洛尔与0.5%马来酸噻吗洛尔对眼压升高患者的疗效。青光眼血流动力学夜间研究试验组。

Efficacy of carteolol hydrochloride 1% vs timolol maleate 0.5% in patients with increased intraocular pressure. Nocturnal Investigation of Glaucoma Hemodynamics Trial Study Group.

作者信息

Stewart W C, Cohen J S, Netland P A, Weiss H, Nussbaum L L

机构信息

Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, USA.

出版信息

Am J Ophthalmol. 1997 Oct;124(4):498-505. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9394(14)70865-7.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To evaluate the ocular hypotensive effect and safety of carteolol hydrochloride 1% vs timolol maleate 0.5%.

METHODS

One hundred seventy-six patients with ocular hypertension or primary open-angle glaucoma were randomly assigned to receive either carteolol 1% twice a day or timolol maleate 0.5% solution twice a day in a randomized, double-masked, multicenter, parallel-group, active-control comparison trial during a 3-month period.

RESULTS

After 12 weeks, carteolol 1% reduced the mean +/- SE intraocular pressure from 25.0 +/- 0.3 to 19.5 +/- 0.3 mm Hg; timolol maleate 0.5% reduced the mean intraocular pressure from 25.2 +/- 0.3 to 19.6 +/- 0.3 mm Hg. The mean difference in trough intraocular pressure between carteolol and timolol maleate of -0.14 mm Hg was not significantly (P = .745) different (95% confidence limits, -0.97 to 0.70 mm Hg). Trough pulse and blood pressure also showed no consistent statistically significant differences between groups. The 2-hour postdose pulse, however, demonstrated a greater decrease in the timolol maleate than in the carteolol group (P < .001). Systemic and ocular signs and symptoms were similar between the groups except that the number of treatment-emergent reports of bradycardia was greater in the timolol maleate group (P = .039), and the carteolol group reported fewer ocular symptoms than the timolol maleate group did (P < .01).

CONCLUSIONS

Both carteolol 1% and timolol maleate 0.5% are highly effective in lowering intraocular pressure when measured at the end of the dosing interval. Carteolol 1% demonstrates an ocular hypotensive effect and safety profile similar to those of timolol maleate 0.5% solution.

摘要

目的

评估1%盐酸卡替洛尔与0.5%马来酸噻吗洛尔的降眼压效果及安全性。

方法

在一项为期3个月的随机、双盲、多中心、平行组、活性对照比较试验中,176例高眼压症或原发性开角型青光眼患者被随机分配,分别接受每日两次1%卡替洛尔或每日两次0.5%马来酸噻吗洛尔溶液治疗。

结果

12周后,1%卡替洛尔使平均±标准误眼压从25.0±0.3降至19.5±0.3 mmHg;0.5%马来酸噻吗洛尔使平均眼压从25.2±0.3降至19.6±0.3 mmHg。卡替洛尔与马来酸噻吗洛尔之间谷值眼压的平均差值为-0.14 mmHg,差异无统计学意义(P = 0.745)(95%置信区间,-0.97至0.70 mmHg)。谷值脉搏和血压在两组之间也未显示出一致的统计学显著差异。然而,给药后2小时的脉搏显示,马来酸噻吗洛尔组的下降幅度大于卡替洛尔组(P < 0.001)。两组的全身和眼部体征及症状相似,只是马来酸噻吗洛尔组出现心动过缓的治疗突发报告数量更多(P = 0.039),且卡替洛尔组报告的眼部症状少于马来酸噻吗洛尔组(P < 0.01)。

结论

在给药间隔结束时测量,1%卡替洛尔和0.5%马来酸噻吗洛尔在降低眼压方面均非常有效。1%卡替洛尔的降眼压效果和安全性与0.5%马来酸噻吗洛尔溶液相似。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验