Maki R H, Marek M N
North Dakota State University, Fargo, USA.
Mem Cognit. 1997 Sep;25(5):677-90. doi: 10.3758/bf03211310.
In three experiments, we tested the one-place, one-perspective rule formulated by Franklin, Tversky, and Coon (1992). This rule proposes that subjects take a neutral, external perspective when they must use multiple viewpoints to make decisions about the locations of objects in memorized scenes. We compared responding from a single viewpoint with responding from two viewpoints. In Experiments 1 and 2, we used a sentence verification procedure, and in Experiment 3, we compared a true-false verification procedure with a six-alternative forced-choice procedure. Under these various conditions, we observed egocentric spatial framework effects in that above-below judgments were faster than front-back judgments and front-back judgments were faster than right-left judgments. When responding from two points of view in a single place, our subjects took multiple intrinsic perspectives rather than one neutral external perspective as proposed by the one-place, one-perspective rule.
在三个实验中，我们测试了富兰克林、特沃斯基和库恩（1992年）制定的单位置、单视角规则。该规则提出，当受试者必须使用多个视角来对记忆场景中物体的位置做出决策时，他们会采取中立的外部视角。我们将从单一视角的反应与从两个视角的反应进行了比较。在实验1和实验2中，我们使用了句子验证程序，在实验3中，我们将对错验证程序与六选强制选择程序进行了比较。在这些不同条件下，我们观察到了自我中心空间框架效应，即上下判断比前后判断更快，前后判断比左右判断更快。当在单个位置从两个视角做出反应时，我们的受试者采取了多个内在视角，而不是单位置、单视角规则所提出的一个中立外部视角。
