• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

为什么区分左右比区分上下更难?

Why is telling right from left more difficult than telling above from below?

作者信息

Maki R H, Grandy C A, Hauge G

出版信息

J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1979 Feb;5(1):52-67. doi: 10.1037//0096-1523.5.1.52.

DOI:10.1037//0096-1523.5.1.52
PMID:575158
Abstract

Adults take longer to judge the locations of horizontal stimuli than to judge the locations of vertical stimuli. In order to determine the source of this difficulty with the horizontal dimension, the congruity between the locations of stimuli and verbal descriptions was judged in a reaction time (RT) task. Because bilateral symmetry of the nervous system may be related to the difficulty with horizontal stimuli, this was varied by using right-handed, left-handed, and ambidextrous subjects. However, this variable produced no significant effects in the RT task. Horizontal stimuli took longer than vertical stimuli whether the verbal description was encoded before or during the RT periods, suggesting that label encoding is not the entire source of the effect. However, when the verbal labels were eliminated entirely by having subjects learn and use stimulus-letter pairs, horizontal stimuli did not take longer than vertical stimuli. This suggests that perception of the stimulus is not the cause of the difficulty. Together, the experiments indicated that comparing horizontal labels to stimuli is the largest source of the difficulty in telling right from left. Reasons why adults have such a problem were discussed.

摘要

成年人判断水平刺激的位置比判断垂直刺激的位置所需时间更长。为了确定在水平维度上出现这种困难的根源,在一项反应时(RT)任务中,对刺激位置与言语描述之间的一致性进行了判断。由于神经系统的双侧对称性可能与水平刺激的困难有关,因此通过使用右利手、左利手和双手灵巧的受试者来改变这一因素。然而,这一变量在反应时任务中未产生显著影响。无论言语描述是在反应时期间之前还是期间进行编码,水平刺激比垂直刺激所需时间更长,这表明标签编码并非该效应的全部根源。然而,当通过让受试者学习并使用刺激 - 字母对而完全消除言语标签时,水平刺激所需时间并不比垂直刺激长。这表明对刺激的感知不是造成困难的原因。综合来看,这些实验表明,将水平标签与刺激进行比较是区分左右时困难的最大根源。文中还讨论了成年人出现此类问题的原因。

相似文献

1
Why is telling right from left more difficult than telling above from below?为什么区分左右比区分上下更难?
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1979 Feb;5(1):52-67. doi: 10.1037//0096-1523.5.1.52.
2
Processing locational and orientational information.处理位置和方向信息。
Mem Cognit. 1977 Sep;5(5):602-12. doi: 10.3758/BF03197406.
3
Left visual field superiority in a letter-naming task for both left- and right-handers.在字母命名任务中,左撇子和右撇子均存在左视野优势。
Cortex. 1982 Jul;18(2):245-55. doi: 10.1016/s0010-9452(82)80006-3.
4
Coding left and right.编码左与右。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1979 Feb;5(1):42-51. doi: 10.1037//0096-1523.5.1.42.
5
The role of verbal labels in the judgment of orientation and location.言语标签在方向和位置判断中的作用。
Perception. 1985;14(1):67-80. doi: 10.1068/p140067.
6
No prevalence of right-left over top-bottom spatial codes.
Percept Psychophys. 1996 Jan;58(1):102-10. doi: 10.3758/bf03205480.
7
Vertical versus horizontal spatial compatibility: right-left prevalence with bimanual responses.垂直与水平空间兼容性:双手反应中的左右优势
Psychol Res. 2000;64(1):25-40. doi: 10.1007/s004260000035.
8
Does right-left prevalence occur for the Simon effect?西蒙效应是否存在左右优势?
Percept Psychophys. 2003 Nov;65(8):1318-29. doi: 10.3758/bf03194855.
9
Visual spatial attention to stimuli presented on the vertical and horizontal meridian: an ERP study.对垂直和水平子午线呈现的刺激的视觉空间注意:一项事件相关电位研究。
Psychophysiology. 1994 Mar;31(2):140-53. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.1994.tb01034.x.
10
Influence of short incompatible practice on the Simon effect: transfer along the vertical dimension and across vertical and horizontal dimensions.简短不兼容练习对西蒙效应的影响:沿垂直维度以及跨垂直与水平维度的迁移
Exp Brain Res. 2015 Nov;233(11):3313-21. doi: 10.1007/s00221-015-4399-1. Epub 2015 Aug 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Unraveling the contribution of left-right language on spatial perspective taking.揭示左右语言对空间视角采择的作用。
Spat Cogn Comput. 2021;21(1):1-38. doi: 10.1080/13875868.2020.1825442. Epub 2020 Oct 5.
2
Alternative spin on phylogenetically inherited spatial reference frames.对系统发生遗传的空间参照框架的另一种解读。
Cognition. 2019 Oct;191:103983. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2019.05.020. Epub 2019 Jun 26.
3
Imagining others' handedness: visual and motor processes in the attribution of the dominant hand to an imagined agent.
想象他人的利手:将优势手归因于想象中的主体的视觉和运动过程。
Exp Brain Res. 2013 Aug;229(1):37-46. doi: 10.1007/s00221-013-3587-0. Epub 2013 Jun 7.
4
Attention to Speech-Accompanying Gestures: Eye Movements and Information Uptake.关注言语伴随手势:眼动与信息获取。
J Nonverbal Behav. 2009 Dec;33(4):251-277. doi: 10.1007/s10919-009-0073-2. Epub 2009 Jul 19.
5
Spatial coding in two dimensions.二维空间编码
Psychon Bull Rev. 2006 Apr;13(2):201-16. doi: 10.3758/bf03193832.
6
Egocentric organization of spatial activities in imagined navigation.
Mem Cognit. 2003 Mar;31(2):252-61. doi: 10.3758/bf03194384.
7
Egocentric spatial framework effects from single and multiple points of view.来自单一和多个视角的自我中心空间框架效应。
Mem Cognit. 1997 Sep;25(5):677-90. doi: 10.3758/bf03211310.
8
Right-left confusion in the adult: a verbal labeling effect.
Mem Cognit. 1981 Jul;9(4):339-50. doi: 10.3758/bf03197558.
9
On how adults identify the orientation of a shape.
Percept Psychophys. 1981 Feb;29(2):138-44. doi: 10.3758/bf03207277.
10
Identification of symmetry: effects of stimulus orientation and head position.
Percept Psychophys. 1982 Nov;32(5):443-8. doi: 10.3758/bf03202774.