• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估和验证两种估计脑结构体积的方法:镶嵌法和简单像素计数法。

Evaluating and validating two methods for estimating brain structure volumes: tessellation and simple pixel counting.

作者信息

Arndt S, Swayze V, Cizadlo T, O'Leary D, Cohen G, Yuh W T, Ehrhardt J C, Andreasen N C

机构信息

Department of Preventive Medicine and Environmental Health, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City 52242, USA.

出版信息

Neuroimage. 1994 Jun;1(3):191-8. doi: 10.1006/nimg.1994.1004.

DOI:10.1006/nimg.1994.1004
PMID:9343570
Abstract

Developments in imaging technology have made three-dimensional visualization of internal brain structures possible with excellent resolution. Since improved visualization implies improved measurement, these advances hold promise to more accurately measure the volumes of internal structures. As new technologies and techniques emerge, evaluating the relative benefits of measurement methods becomes necessary. We compared and evaluated two methods of estimating volumes from images of brain structures. One method counted pixels within a region of interest, while the other method tessellated the surface between tracings on adjacent slices. Our study assessed both measurement error for true phantom volumes and method disparity for in vivo structures in a randomly selected sample of subjects (n = 100). For our comparisons, we focused on the temporal lobe, ventricular system, and hippocampus. Bias, independence of measurement errors and maximal discrimination of individual differences are properties that are relevant to validating and evaluating measurements of cerebral structure. Pixel counting proved to be the more robust of the two methods, being less sensitive to nuisance-interactions between size of object, shape, and slice thickness. Clinical and research applications of imaging techniques may have distinctive but overlapping needs when evaluating and validating new developments in imaging.

摘要

成像技术的发展已使以高分辨率对脑内部结构进行三维可视化成为可能。由于可视化的改善意味着测量的改进,这些进展有望更准确地测量内部结构的体积。随着新技术和技术的出现,评估测量方法的相对优势变得必要。我们比较并评估了两种从脑结构图像估计体积的方法。一种方法是计算感兴趣区域内的像素,而另一种方法是对相邻切片上的描边之间的表面进行三角剖分。我们的研究评估了在随机选择的受试者样本(n = 100)中,真实模型体积的测量误差和体内结构的方法差异。为了进行比较,我们重点关注颞叶、脑室系统和海马体。偏差、测量误差的独立性以及个体差异的最大区分度是与验证和评估脑结构测量相关的特性。事实证明,在这两种方法中,像素计数更为稳健,对物体大小、形状和切片厚度之间的干扰相互作用不太敏感。在评估和验证成像领域的新进展时,成像技术的临床和研究应用可能有独特但重叠的需求。

相似文献

1
Evaluating and validating two methods for estimating brain structure volumes: tessellation and simple pixel counting.评估和验证两种估计脑结构体积的方法:镶嵌法和简单像素计数法。
Neuroimage. 1994 Jun;1(3):191-8. doi: 10.1006/nimg.1994.1004.
2
Analysis of factors associated with volumetric data errors in gamma knife radiosurgery.伽玛刀放射外科中与容积数据误差相关的因素分析。
Stereotact Funct Neurosurg. 2009;87(1):1-7. doi: 10.1159/000177622. Epub 2009 Nov 27.
3
A new method for the in vivo volumetric measurement of the human hippocampus with high neuroanatomical accuracy.
Hippocampus. 2000;10(6):752-8. doi: 10.1002/1098-1063(2000)10:6<752::AID-HIPO1012>3.0.CO;2-Y.
4
Comparison of two different measurement techniques of hippocampal resection length in temporal lobe epilepsy: results of a prospective study.颞叶癫痫中海马切除长度两种不同测量技术的比较:一项前瞻性研究的结果
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2008 Aug;150(8):785-95; discussion 795. doi: 10.1007/s00701-008-1551-8. Epub 2008 Apr 21.
5
Whole-brain morphometric study of schizophrenia revealing a spatially complex set of focal abnormalities.精神分裂症的全脑形态测量学研究揭示了一组空间上复杂的局灶性异常。
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2005 Nov;62(11):1218-27. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.62.11.1218.
6
Effects of method and MRI slice thickness on entorhinal cortex volumetry.
Neuroreport. 2003 Jul 18;14(10):1291-5. doi: 10.1097/01.wnr.0000077545.91466.73.
7
Sex-specific, postpuberty changes in mouse brain structures revealed by three-dimensional magnetic resonance microscopy.三维磁共振显微镜揭示小鼠脑结构青春期后特定性别的变化。
Neuroimage. 2004 Aug;22(4):1636-45. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.03.051.
8
Semiautomatic brain region extraction: a method of parcellating brain regions from structural magnetic resonance images.半自动脑区提取:一种从结构磁共振图像中划分脑区的方法。
Neuroimage. 2004 Aug;22(4):1492-502. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.03.023.
9
Feedback-assisted three-dimensional reconstruction of the left ventricle with MRI.磁共振成像反馈辅助的左心室三维重建
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2003 May;17(5):528-37. doi: 10.1002/jmri.10290.
10
Registration of MR/MR and MR/SPECT brain images by fast stochastic optimization of robust voxel similarity measures.通过快速随机优化鲁棒体素相似性度量实现磁共振成像/磁共振成像和磁共振成像/单光子发射计算机断层扫描脑图像配准
Neuroimage. 1998 Jul;8(1):30-43. doi: 10.1006/nimg.1998.0335.

引用本文的文献

1
Stitcher: A Surface Reconstruction Tool for Highly Gyrified Brains.缝合器:用于高度回旋脑的表面重建工具。
Neuroinformatics. 2024 Oct;22(4):539-554. doi: 10.1007/s12021-024-09678-2. Epub 2024 Oct 10.
2
Application of glutamate weighted CEST in brain imaging of nicotine dependent participants in vivo at 7T.谷氨酸加权 CEST 在 7T 活体尼古丁依赖参与者脑成像中的应用。
PLoS One. 2024 Feb 16;19(2):e0297310. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0297310. eCollection 2024.
3
Validation of hippocampal volumes measured using a manual method and two automated methods (FreeSurfer and IBASPM) in chronic major depressive disorder.
在慢性重度抑郁症中使用手动方法以及两种自动方法(FreeSurfer和IBASPM)测量海马体积的验证。
Neuroradiology. 2008 Jul;50(7):569-81. doi: 10.1007/s00234-008-0383-9. Epub 2008 Apr 15.
4
Structural brain abnormalities in juvenile myoclonic epilepsy patients: volumetry and voxel-based morphometry.青少年肌阵挛癫痫患者的脑结构异常:容积测量和基于体素的形态学测量
Korean J Radiol. 2006 Jul-Sep;7(3):162-72. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2006.7.3.162.
5
No difference in hippocampus volume detected on magnetic resonance imaging in autistic individuals.
J Autism Dev Disord. 1998 Apr;28(2):105-10. doi: 10.1023/a:1026084430649.