Suppr超能文献

克林霉素/过氧化苯甲酰凝胶联合治疗痤疮与克林霉素凝胶、过氧化苯甲酰凝胶及赋形剂凝胶的比较:两项双盲研究的综合结果

Treatment of acne with a combination clindamycin/benzoyl peroxide gel compared with clindamycin gel, benzoyl peroxide gel and vehicle gel: combined results of two double-blind investigations.

作者信息

Lookingbill D P, Chalker D K, Lindholm J S, Katz H I, Kempers S E, Huerter C J, Swinehart J M, Schelling D J, Klauda H C

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine, Hershey, USA.

出版信息

J Am Acad Dermatol. 1997 Oct;37(4):590-5. doi: 10.1016/s0190-9622(97)70177-4.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

It has previously been shown that a combination of erythromycin and benzoyl peroxide is superior to either ingredient when used alone in the treatment of acne. A clindamycin/benzoyl peroxide combination gel might have an advantage over erythromycin/benzoyl peroxide gel because the former does not require refrigeration after it is dispensed.

OBJECTIVE

Our purpose was to determine the efficacy and safety of a combination clindamycin/benzoyl peroxide gel when compared with benzoyl peroxide, clindamycin, or vehicle gels.

METHODS

In two double-blind, randomized, parallel, vehicle-controlled trials, patients were treated for 11 weeks with once-nightly application of one of the above preparations. Evaluations were performed at 2, 5, 8, and 11 weeks and included lesion counts and assessment of global responses and irritant effects.

RESULTS

A total of 334 patients completed the study. All three active preparations were significantly superior to the vehicle in global improvement and in reducing inflammatory lesions and noninflammatory lesions. The combination gel was significantly superior to the two individual agents in global improvement and reduction of inflammatory lesions and also to the clindamycin gel in reducing noninflammatory lesions. There was no significant difference in tolerance to the active gels versus the vehicle gel.

CONCLUSION

In the treatment of acne, topical clindamycin/benzoyl peroxide combination gel is well tolerated and superior to either individual ingredient.

摘要

背景

先前的研究表明,在治疗痤疮时,红霉素和过氧化苯甲酰联合使用比单独使用任何一种成分的效果更好。克林霉素/过氧化苯甲酰凝胶可能比红霉素/过氧化苯甲酰凝胶更具优势,因为前者在分装后无需冷藏。

目的

我们的目的是确定与过氧化苯甲酰、克林霉素或赋形剂凝胶相比,克林霉素/过氧化苯甲酰凝胶联合使用的疗效和安全性。

方法

在两项双盲、随机、平行、赋形剂对照试验中,患者每晚使用上述制剂之一进行治疗,为期11周。在第2、5、8和11周进行评估,包括皮损计数、整体反应评估和刺激性评估。

结果

共有334名患者完成了研究。所有三种活性制剂在整体改善、减少炎性皮损和非炎性皮损方面均显著优于赋形剂。联合凝胶在整体改善和减少炎性皮损方面显著优于两种单一药物,在减少非炎性皮损方面也优于克林霉素凝胶。活性凝胶与赋形剂凝胶的耐受性无显著差异。

结论

在治疗痤疮时,外用克林霉素/过氧化苯甲酰凝胶耐受性良好,且优于任何一种单一成分。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验