Strender L E, Lundin M, Nell K
Department of Clinical Neuroscience and Family Medicine, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.
J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1997 Oct;20(8):516-20.
There are numerous clinical tests used in the evaluation of patients with symptoms arising from the cervical spine. It is necessary to use clinical tests with high validity and reliability. Previous studies of reliability of clinical tests used in the evaluation of the cervical spine have come to various conclusions, most of which suggest low reliability. This might be explained by differences between examiners in performance and where the limit of normality is placed.
To evaluate the interexaminer reliability of clinical tests used in everyday clinical work, where the examiners base their evaluations on a comparison between left and right sides.
A total of 50 volunteers were examined by two physiotherapists. The interexaminer reliability of clinical tests included in the physical examination of patients with symptoms from the cervical spine was evaluated.
Two physiotherapists independently examined volunteers.
An acceptable reliability was found for two of 10 clinical tests.
When it is possible to compare left and right sides, it is possible to show acceptable reliability for some clinical tests. Reliability studies most often find low reliability, perhaps because of bias; clinical tests are not standardized. In future studies, greater efforts should be taken to reduce bias.
在评估有颈椎症状的患者时,有许多临床检查方法。使用有效性和可靠性高的临床检查很有必要。先前关于用于评估颈椎的临床检查可靠性的研究得出了各种结论,其中大多数表明可靠性较低。这可能是由于检查者在操作以及正常范围界定方面存在差异所致。
评估日常临床工作中使用的临床检查的检查者间可靠性,其中检查者基于左右两侧的比较进行评估。
两名物理治疗师对总共50名志愿者进行了检查。评估了对有颈椎症状患者进行体格检查时所包含的临床检查的检查者间可靠性。
两名物理治疗师独立检查志愿者。
在10项临床检查中,有2项显示出可接受的可靠性。
当能够比较左右两侧时,某些临床检查有可能显示出可接受的可靠性。可靠性研究大多发现可靠性较低,这可能是由于偏差所致;临床检查未标准化。在未来的研究中,应加大力度减少偏差。