Hausswirth C, Bigard A X, Le Chevalier J M
Laboratoire de Biomécanique et de Physiologie, Institut National du Sport et de l'Education Physique, Paris, France.
Int J Sports Med. 1997 Aug;18(6):449-53. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-972662.
The purpose of this study was to test the accuracy of oxygen uptake (VO2) measurements using the Cosmed K4 portable telemetry system. This system of higher technology than the original Cosmed K2 device, contains a CO2 electrode allowing measurements alternatively by either the Cosmed K4 system (K4) or the CPX Medical Graphics (CPX) during a maximum oxygen uptake (VO2max) ergocycle test, at rest and during several submaximal exercises (25, 50 and 75% of maximal work rate) in seven subjects. Heart rate values were comparable for exercise at the same work stage during gas collection using the two systems, indicating that the physiological stresses were similar. The VO2 values did not significantly differ at rest (4.40+/-0.83 vs 4.16+/-0.58ml x min(-1) x kg[-1]), at 25% Wmax (20.97+/-1.31 vs 21.32+/-2.54 ml x min(-1) x kg[-1]), at 50% Wmax (33.32+/-3.92 vs 33.50+/-3.51 ml x min(-1) x kg[-1]), at 75% Wmax (47.01+/-7.51 vs 47.49+/-7.11 ml x min(-1) kg[-1]) and at maximal intensities (62.07+/-8.48 vs 62.84+/-11.31 ml x min(-1) kg[-1]) using K4 and CPX devices, respectively. The results of this study indicated that the K4 system was accurate for all oxygen uptake measurements from rest to maximum exercise levels.
本研究的目的是测试使用科美康K4便携式遥测系统测量摄氧量(VO2)的准确性。该系统技术比原始的科美康K2设备更先进,包含一个二氧化碳电极,在七名受试者进行最大摄氧量(VO2max)踏车测试、静息状态以及几次亚极量运动(最大工作率的25%、50%和75%)期间,可通过科美康K4系统(K4)或CPX医学图形系统(CPX)交替进行测量。在使用这两种系统进行气体收集时,相同工作阶段运动时的心率值具有可比性,表明生理应激相似。使用K4和CPX设备时,静息状态下的VO2值(4.40±0.83对4.16±0.58ml·min⁻¹·kg⁻¹)、25%Wmax时(20.97±1.31对21.32±2.54ml·min⁻¹·kg⁻¹)、50%Wmax时(33.32±3.92对33.50±3.51ml·min⁻¹·kg⁻¹)、75%Wmax时(47.01±7.51对47.49±7.11ml·min⁻¹·kg⁻¹)以及最大强度时(62.07±8.48对62.84±11.31ml·min⁻¹·kg⁻¹)均无显著差异。本研究结果表明,K4系统在从静息到最大运动水平的所有摄氧量测量中都是准确的。