Maiolo C, Melchiorri G, Iacopino L, Masala S, De Lorenzo A
Division of Human Nutrition, Faculty of Medicine and Surgery, University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Br J Sports Med. 2003;37(5):445-7. doi: 10.1136/bjsm.37.5.445.
Several studies have evaluated the accuracy of portable metabolic gas analysis systems, which measure physical activity energy expenditure. Since the Cosmed K2 telemetric system, two K4 devices (RQ and b2) have been developed.
To compare measurements using the Cosmed K4 RQ with measurements by a traditional method (mass spectrometer) for a sample of healthy subjects performing physical exercise of various intensities.
Nine healthy male footballers (mean (SD) age 18.3 (2.2) years) performed an incremental exercise running test from 8 km/h to exhaustion, with an increase of 2 km/h for each level of the test protocol. The expired air was collected simultaneously using the Cosmed K4 RQ and Airspec QP9000 mass spectrometer. Oxygen consumption (VO2) and carbon dioxide production (VCO2) were measured at rest and at each exercise intensity.
No significant differences were found between VO2 and VCO2 measured by the two instruments, at rest or during exercise.
The application of the Cosmed K4 RQ system for VO2 and VCO2 measurements at rest and during both submaximal and maximal exercise may be of interest to sport physiologists, nutritionists, and doctors.
多项研究评估了测量身体活动能量消耗的便携式代谢气体分析系统的准确性。自Cosmed K2遥测系统以来,已开发出两款K4设备(RQ和b2)。
比较Cosmed K4 RQ的测量结果与传统方法(质谱仪)对进行各种强度体育锻炼的健康受试者样本的测量结果。
九名健康男性足球运动员(平均(标准差)年龄18.3(2.2)岁)进行了从8公里/小时到力竭的递增运动跑步测试,测试方案的每个级别速度增加2公里/小时。使用Cosmed K4 RQ和Airspec QP9000质谱仪同时收集呼出气体。在休息时和每个运动强度下测量耗氧量(VO2)和二氧化碳产生量(VCO2)。
两种仪器在休息或运动期间测量的VO2和VCO2之间未发现显著差异。
Cosmed K4 RQ系统在休息时以及次最大和最大运动期间用于VO2和VCO2测量,可能会引起运动生理学家、营养学家和医生的兴趣。