Kalich R, Bennert G, Fiedler T, Kubin M, Turzova M, Ulber H
J Hyg Epidemiol Microbiol Immunol. 1979;23(3):307-17.
In cooperation of 6 laboratories in Czechoslovakia and in the GDR, the efficiency of auramine-rhodamine B (AR) and acridine orange (AO) (short-time method) for staining of acid-fast bacilli was compared. Whereas a former comparison of AR and AO (original method) pointed out the superiority of AR, the investigation of both methods used as short-time procedures showed significantly more acid-fast rods after using AO. The number of "false positive" results was somewhat higher on AR staining. However the results depend not only on the method used but also on the procedure of staining and the optical equipment, and they are essentially influenced by the experience and proficiency of the microscopist. Taking into account the results of both studies both auramine-rhodamine B and acridine orange can be proposed for the staining of slides for microscopical detection of acid-fast rods. In case of AO, the short-time method is superior to the original long-time procedure.
捷克斯洛伐克和民主德国的6个实验室合作,比较了金胺-罗丹明B(AR)和吖啶橙(AO)(短时法)对抗酸杆菌的染色效率。虽然之前对AR和AO(原方法)的比较指出AR更具优势,但将两种方法用作短时程序的研究表明,使用AO后显示出的抗酸杆菌明显更多。AR染色的“假阳性”结果数量略高。然而,结果不仅取决于所使用的方法,还取决于染色程序和光学设备,并且它们在很大程度上受显微镜检查人员的经验和熟练程度影响。考虑到两项研究的结果,金胺-罗丹明B和吖啶橙均可用于涂片染色以显微镜检测抗酸杆菌。对于AO,短时法优于原来的长时程序。