Sparrow M J, Fauck R, Gupta R K
Cytology Laboratory, Wellington Hospital, Capital Coast Health Ltd.
N Z Med J. 1997 Sep 26;110(1052):356-8.
To compare the adequacy of cervical smear taking, using the Aylesbury spatula plus cytology brush with the Cervex broom.
Two cervical smears were taken at the same visit, the women acting as their own controls. In Group 1 comprising 81 women, the first smear was taken using the Cervex broom. In Group 2 comprising 97 women, the first smear was taken using the Aylesbury spatula followed by the cytology brush. The tips of the samplers were sent to the laboratory in a cytology container with 30% ethyl alcohol in saline, for analysis of residual cells.
It took experienced staff two or three smears before they were adept at taking an adequate Cervex broom sample as defined by the presence of endocervical cells. Both techniques were equally good at detecting significant abnormalities. When the Cervex broom was used first there were more smears with no blood present but when bleeding occurred there was no significant difference between the two groups. Both techniques were well accepted by the women.
Although it is more expensive than the Aylesbury spatula and the cytology brush the Cervex broom has the advantage of allowing a simple one step procedure, thereby reducing the potential for air drying.
比较使用艾尔斯伯里刮匙加细胞学刷与宫颈扫帚采样器采集宫颈涂片的充分性。
在同一次就诊时采集两份宫颈涂片,女性作为自身对照。在由81名女性组成的第1组中,第一次涂片使用宫颈扫帚采样器采集。在由97名女性组成的第2组中,第一次涂片使用艾尔斯伯里刮匙,随后使用细胞学刷。采样器的尖端被放入装有30%乙醇生理盐水的细胞学容器中送往实验室,用于分析残留细胞。
经验丰富的工作人员在熟练采集到符合宫颈管细胞存在定义的足够的宫颈扫帚采样器样本之前,需要进行两到三次涂片。两种技术在检测重大异常方面同样出色。当首先使用宫颈扫帚采样器时,无血涂片更多,但当出现出血情况时,两组之间没有显著差异。两种技术都很受女性接受。
尽管宫颈扫帚采样器比艾尔斯伯里刮匙和细胞学刷更昂贵,但它具有允许简单一步操作的优点,从而减少了空气干燥的可能性。