Suppr超能文献

在高负担艾滋病毒环境中,与延长型刮片相比,使用Cervex-Brush(扫帚刷)采集传统宫颈细胞学样本的成本效益:基于模型的分析

Cost-effectiveness of using the Cervex-Brush (broom) compared to the elongated spatula for collection of conventional cervical cytology samples within a high-burden HIV setting: a model-based analysis.

作者信息

Schnippel Kathryn, Michelow Pamela, Chibwesha Carla J, Makura Caroline, Lince-Deroche Naomi, Goeieman Bridgette, Mulongo Masangu, Jordaan Suzette, Firnhaber Cynthia

机构信息

Right to Care, Johannesburg, South Africa.

Clinical HIV Research Unit, Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.

出版信息

BMC Health Serv Res. 2015 Nov 6;15:499. doi: 10.1186/s12913-015-1163-y.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

From 2010 to 2014, approximately 2 million Pap smears from HIV-infected women were submitted to the South African National Health Laboratory Services (NHLS) through the national cervical cancer screening programme. The objective of this analysis was to determine whether using the plastic Cervex brush ("broom") would be a cost-effective approach to improve cytology specimen quality as compared to the wooden spatula used currently.

METHODS

A decision analysis model was built using the expected adequacy rates for samples collected with the spatula (<$0.02) and broom ($0.23) and the probability of detecting cervical dysplasia. NHLS data was used for testing volumes and rates of HIV-positivity, suitability of specimens, and presence of endocervical cells. Expected positivity of Pap smears in HIV-infected women (73 %), odds ratios of the effectiveness of the broom (OR: 1.57), and improved sensitivity when endocervical cells present (OR: 1.89) are from literature. NHLS costs were used for the collection devices and conventional cytology ($4.89). Cost of clinic visit is from WHO CHOICE ($8.36).

RESULTS

In 2010, 80 % of specimens submitted to NHLS were adequate for evaluation; in 2014, only 54 % met the same criteria. For HIV-infected women, according to the guidelines model, using the wooden spatula costs $6.25 million per year, $16.79 per woman tested. Under intended practice, for each additional HSIL case detected among HIV-infected women, the South African cervical cancer screening programme could save $13.64 (95 % CI: $13.52 to $13.76) by using the broom as its standard of care collection device through increased collection of endocervical cells and consequent reduction in repeat Pap smears.

CONCLUSION

Under a wide range of parameters tested using a simulation model, the more expensive plastic broom could save the South African cervical cancer screening programme money and increase detection of high-grade cervical dysplasia in HIV-infected women compared to the current wooden spatula.

摘要

背景

2010年至2014年期间,通过国家宫颈癌筛查计划,约200万份来自感染艾滋病毒女性的巴氏涂片被提交至南非国家卫生实验室服务中心(NHLS)。本分析的目的是确定与目前使用的木质刮板相比,使用塑料宫颈刷(“扫帚刷”)是否为提高细胞学标本质量的一种具有成本效益的方法。

方法

利用刮板(<0.02美元)和扫帚刷(0.23美元)采集样本的预期充足率以及检测宫颈发育异常的概率,建立了一个决策分析模型。NHLS的数据用于检测量、艾滋病毒阳性率、标本适用性以及宫颈管细胞的存在情况。感染艾滋病毒女性巴氏涂片的预期阳性率(73%)、扫帚刷有效性的优势比(OR:1.57)以及存在宫颈管细胞时提高的敏感性(OR:1.89)均来自文献。NHLS成本用于采集设备和传统细胞学检查(4.89美元)。门诊费用来自世界卫生组织的CHOICE(8.36美元)。

结果

2010年,提交至NHLS的标本中有80%足以进行评估;2014年,只有54%的标本符合相同标准。对于感染艾滋病毒的女性,根据指南模型,使用木质刮板每年花费625万美元,每位接受检测的女性花费16.79美元。在实际操作中,对于在感染艾滋病毒的女性中每多检测出一例高级别鳞状上皮内病变(HSIL)病例,南非宫颈癌筛查计划通过使用扫帚刷作为其标准护理采集设备,增加宫颈管细胞的采集并因此减少重复巴氏涂片,可为每例病例节省13.64美元(95%可信区间:13.52美元至13.76美元)。

结论

在使用模拟模型测试的广泛参数范围内,与目前的木质刮板相比,更昂贵的塑料扫帚刷可为南非宫颈癌筛查计划节省资金,并增加对感染艾滋病毒女性高级别宫颈发育异常的检测。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验