Gan T J, Ginsberg B, Glass P S, Fortney J, Jhaveri R, Perno R
Department of Anesthesiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina 27710, USA.
Anesthesiology. 1997 Nov;87(5):1075-81. doi: 10.1097/00000542-199711000-00011.
A naloxone infusion is effective in reducing epidural and intrathecal opioid-related side effects. The use of naloxone infusion concomitant with intravenous morphine patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) has not been evaluated, probably because of an expected direct antagonism of the systemic opioid effect. The authors compared the incidence of morphine-related side effects and the quality of analgesia from two small doses of naloxone infusion.
Sixty patients classified as American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status 1, 2, or 3 who were scheduled for total abdominal hysterectomies were enrolled in the study. Patients received a standardized general anesthetic. In the postanesthetic care unit, patients received morphine as a PCA. They were randomized to receive either 0.25 microg x kg(-1) x h(-1) naloxone (low dose), 1 microg x kg(-1) x h(-1) (high dose), or saline (placebo) as a continuous infusion. Verbal rating scores for pain, nausea, vomiting, and pruritus; sedation scores; requests for antiemetic; and morphine use were recorded for 24 h. Blood pressure, respiratory rate, and oxyhemoglobin saturation were also monitored.
Sixty patients completed the study. Both naloxone doses were equally effective in reducing the incidence of nausea, vomiting, and pruritus compared with placebo (P < 0.05 by the chi-squared test). There was no difference in the verbal rating scores for pain between the groups. The cumulative morphine use was the lowest in the low-dose group (42.3 +/- 24.1 mg; means +/- SD) compared with the placebo (59.1 +/- 27.4 mg) and high-dose groups (64.7 +/- 33.0 mg) at 24 h (P < 0.05 by analysis of variance). There was no incidence of respiratory depression (<8 breaths/min) and no difference in sedation scores, antiemetic use, respiratory rate, and hemodynamic parameters among the groups.
Naloxone is effective in preventing PCA opioid-related side effects. Naloxone infusion at 0.25 microg x kg(-1) x h(-1) not only attenuates these side effects but appears to reduce postoperative (beyond 4-8 h) opioid requirements. This dosing regimen can be prepared with 400 microg naloxone in 1,000 ml crystalloid given in 24 h to a patient weighing 70 kg.
输注纳洛酮可有效减少硬膜外和鞘内注射阿片类药物相关的副作用。纳洛酮输注与静脉注射吗啡患者自控镇痛(PCA)同时使用的情况尚未得到评估,可能是因为预计会对全身性阿片类药物效应产生直接拮抗作用。作者比较了两种小剂量纳洛酮输注时吗啡相关副作用的发生率和镇痛质量。
本研究纳入了60例美国麻醉医师协会身体状况分级为1、2或3级且计划行全腹子宫切除术的患者。患者接受标准化全身麻醉。在麻醉后护理单元,患者接受吗啡PCA。他们被随机分为接受0.25μg·kg⁻¹·h⁻¹纳洛酮(低剂量)、1μg·kg⁻¹·h⁻¹(高剂量)或生理盐水(安慰剂)持续输注。记录24小时内的疼痛、恶心、呕吐和瘙痒的视觉模拟评分;镇静评分;使用止吐药的情况;以及吗啡用量。同时监测血压、呼吸频率和氧合血红蛋白饱和度。
60例患者完成了研究。与安慰剂相比,两种纳洛酮剂量在降低恶心、呕吐和瘙痒发生率方面同样有效(卡方检验,P<0.05)。各组间疼痛的视觉模拟评分无差异。24小时时,低剂量组的吗啡累积用量最低(42.3±24.1mg;均值±标准差),与安慰剂组(59.1±27.4mg)和高剂量组(64.7±33.0mg)相比(方差分析,P<0.05)。各组间均未发生呼吸抑制(<8次/分钟),镇静评分、止吐药使用、呼吸频率和血流动力学参数也无差异。
纳洛酮可有效预防PCA阿片类药物相关的副作用。0.25μg·kg⁻¹·h⁻¹的纳洛酮输注不仅可减轻这些副作用,而且似乎可降低术后(超过4 - 8小时)的阿片类药物需求量。对于一名体重70kg的患者,这种给药方案可在24小时内将400μg纳洛酮加入1000ml晶体液中输注。