Langbecker Danette, Janda Monika
School of Nursing and Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology, 60 Musk Avenue, Kelvin Grove, Queensland, 4059, Australia.
J Cancer Educ. 2012 Dec;27(4):738-43. doi: 10.1007/s13187-012-0401-9.
Written information is commonly used to inform patients about their disease and treatment but must be evidence-based and understandable to be useful. This study assessed the quality of the content and the readability of information brochures for people affected by brain tumours. We randomly selected 18 publicly available brochures. Brochures were assessed by criteria to assess the quality of content using the DISCERN instrument. Readability was tested using three commonly used formulas, which yield the reading grade level required to comprehend the brochure (sixth grade level recommended). The mean overall DISCERN score was 3.17 out of a maximum of 5 (moderate quality); only one achieved a rating greater than 4 (high quality). Only one brochure met the sixth grade readability criteria. Although brochures may have accurate content, few satisfied all of the recommended criteria to evaluate their content. Existing brochures need to be critically reviewed and simplified and consumer-focused brochures, produced.
书面信息通常用于向患者告知其疾病和治疗情况,但必须基于证据且易于理解才有用。本研究评估了针对脑肿瘤患者的信息手册的内容质量和可读性。我们随机选取了18份公开可得的手册。使用DISCERN工具通过评估内容质量的标准对手册进行评估。使用三个常用公式测试可读性,这些公式得出理解手册所需的阅读年级水平(建议为六年级水平)。DISCERN总体平均得分在满分5分中为3.17分(质量中等);只有一份手册的评分高于4分(高质量)。只有一份手册符合六年级可读性标准。尽管手册内容可能准确,但很少有手册满足评估其内容的所有推荐标准。现有手册需要进行严格审查并简化,同时制作以消费者为中心的手册。